ORtg
93.5
68th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Isabel Smith
AUS · b. 2009
//measurables
179 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileEfficient scoring profile
Scoring load and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalScorer11.9 PPG · 90th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
11.9 PPGScoring load · 90th event percentile
2.0 stocksDefensive activity · 77th event percentile
- 69.1
- HESI v2.1
- #62
- of 192
- 76%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #62 of 192 · Established
HESI
69.1
Event performance
69th event percentile
PI
69.8
Prospect index
68th event percentile
ORtg
93.5
Points / 100 poss.
68th event percentile
DRtg
83.2
Lower is better
51st event percentile
NRtg
+10.3
Two-way margin
66th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 93.5 · 68th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 83.2 · Stop% 52.2% · Team DRtg 77.7
Sample context
7 games · 186 minutes · 76% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Efficient scoring profileevent-relative description
Scoring load and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring load
11.9 PPG90th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.0 stocks77th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
69.1
69th event percentile
Prospect index
69.8
68th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
93.5
68th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
83.2
51st event percentile
Two-way margin
+10.3
66th event percentile
Stop percentage
52.2%
35th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
11.9 PPG
90th event percentile
Creation
1.4 APG
58th event percentile
Rebounding
2.6 RPG
43rd event percentile
Defensive activity
2.0 stocks
77th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
46.4% TS
69th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P90
Scorer
11.9 PPG · 90th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 69th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 93.5 ORtg and 83.2 DRtg, producing a +10.3 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring load, defensive activity, and scoring efficiency. The lowest relative area is defensive stops.
Relative strengths
- 90th event percentile
Scoring load
11.9 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
- 77th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.0 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
- 69th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
46.4% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Relative weaknesses
- 35th event percentile
Defensive stops
52.2% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
11.9 PPG
90th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
46.4%
69th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
37.2%
47th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
32.4%
43rd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
30.4%
context3.3 attempts per game
Free throws
80.0%
84th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
42.3%
66th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.4 APG
58th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
83.2
51st event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
77.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-5.6
22nd event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
52.2%
35th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.0 STL+BLK
77th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
35.7
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+10.3
66th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+7.8
69th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
69.1
69th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
69.8
68th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
5.3%
77th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
2.6 RPG
43rd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
185.8
context26.5 minutes per game.
Sample weight
75.6%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#62
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
515.1
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
11.9
PPG
2.6
RPG
1.4
APG
#62
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#62/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
11.9
PPG
2.6
RPG
1.4
APG
2.1
TOV/G
1.0
3PM/G
46%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
11.9
P90
Playmaking
1.4
P58
Rebounding
2.6
P43
True shooting
46%
P69
Two-way impact
+10.3
P66
Stops
52%
P35
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
32%
24 made / 74 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
30%
7 made / 23 attempts
FT
Free throws
80%
28 made / 35 attempts
Shot selection
31% of attempts from three
●2PA 51●3PA 23
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
83
PTS
11.9 / game
24–74
FGM–FGA
7–23
3PM–3PA
28–35
FTM–FTA
creation
10
AST
1.4 / game
15
TOV
2.1 / game
0.67×
AST:TOV
26
FD
rebounding
18
REB
2.6 / game
5
OREB
13
DREB
2.6
REB/G
defense
10
STL
1.4 / game
4
BLK
0.6 / game
13
PF
14
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
69.1
HESI
69.8
PI
93.5
ORtg
83.2
DRtg
+10.3
NRtg
+7.8
Stable NRtg
52%
Stop%
42%
Floor%
37%
eFG%
5%
PIE
77.7
Team DRtg
-5.6
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#1
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#60
#61
NZL
4.1 PPG 1.0 RPG 0.6 APG
//event_signalShooter37% 3PT on 2.7 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#63
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
11.9
PPG
2.6
RPG
1.4
APG
1.4
SPG
0.6
BPG
30%
3P%
46%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #62
//quick_read
The line at a glance
11.9
PPG
2.6
RPG
1.4
APG
2.1
TOV/G
1.0
3PM/G
46%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
11.9
P90
Playmaking
1.4
P58
Rebounding
2.6
P43
True shooting
46%
P69
Two-way impact
+10.3
P66
Stops
52%
P35
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
32%
24 made / 74 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
30%
7 made / 23 attempts
FT
Free throws
80%
28 made / 35 attempts
Shot selection
31% of attempts from three
●2PA 51●3PA 23
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
83
PTS
11.9 / game
24–74
FGM–FGA
7–23
3PM–3PA
28–35
FTM–FTA
creation
10
AST
1.4 / game
15
TOV
2.1 / game
0.67×
AST:TOV
26
FD
rebounding
18
REB
2.6 / game
5
OREB
13
DREB
2.6
REB/G
defense
10
STL
1.4 / game
4
BLK
0.6 / game
13
PF
14
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
69.1
HESI
69.8
PI
93.5
ORtg
83.2
DRtg
+10.3
NRtg
+7.8
Stable NRtg
52%
Stop%
42%
Floor%
37%
eFG%
5%
PIE
77.7
Team DRtg
-5.6
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.