ORtg
140.5
99th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Micah Ojo
USA · b. 2009
//measurables
183 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileTwo-way event impact
Defensive activity and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalEvent Impact100.0 HESI performance · 100th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalOffensive Impact140.5 ORtg · 99th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection1.4 BPG · 97th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalTwo-Way Impact+76.4 Net Rating · 97th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
3.6 stocksDefensive activity · 94th event percentile
58.3% TSScoring efficiency · 94th event percentile
- 100.0
- HESI v2.1
- #1
- of 192
- 71%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #1 of 192 · Established
HESI
100.0
Event performance
99th event percentile
PI
94.5
Prospect index
99th event percentile
ORtg
140.5
Points / 100 poss.
99th event percentile
DRtg
64.1
Lower is better
93rd event percentile
NRtg
+76.4
Two-way margin
99th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 140.5 · 99th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 64.1 · Stop% 74.2% · Team DRtg 66.5
Sample context
7 games · 147 minutes · 71% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Two-way event impactevent-relative description
Defensive activity and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Defensive activity
3.6 stocks94th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
58.3% TS94th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
100.0
99th event percentile
Prospect index
94.5
99th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
140.5
99th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
64.1
93rd event percentile
Two-way margin
+76.4
99th event percentile
Stop percentage
74.2%
89th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
11.0 PPG
87th event percentile
Creation
2.3 APG
77th event percentile
Rebounding
5.9 RPG
85th event percentile
Defensive activity
3.6 stocks
94th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
58.3% TS
94th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P100
Event Impact
100.0 HESI performance · 100th event percentile
- P99
Offensive Impact
140.5 ORtg · 99th event percentile
- P97
Rim Protection
1.4 BPG · 97th event percentile
- P97
Two-Way Impact
+76.4 Net Rating · 97th event percentile
- P94
Disruptor
3.6 steals + blocks per game · 94th event percentile
- P94
Event Efficiency
58% TS on 11.0 PPG · 94th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 99th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 140.5 ORtg and 64.1 DRtg, producing a +76.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are two-way margin, offensive efficiency, and defensive activity.
Relative strengths
- 99th event percentile
Two-way margin
+76.4 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
- 99th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
140.5 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
- 94th event percentile
Defensive activity
3.6 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
Relative weaknesses
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
11.0 PPG
87th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
58.3%
94th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
55.1%
94th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
47.5%
91st event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
42.9%
context3.0 attempts per game
Free throws
75.0%
76th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
63.3%
99th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.3 APG
77th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
64.1
93rd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
66.5
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+2.4
79th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
74.2%
89th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
3.6 STL+BLK
94th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
44.0
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+76.4
99th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+54.3
99th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
100.0
99th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
94.5
99th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
13.2%
98th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
5.9 RPG
85th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
147.2
context21.0 minutes per game.
Sample weight
71.0%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#1
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
564.0
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
11.0
PPG
5.9
RPG
2.3
APG
#1
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#1/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
11.0
PPG
5.9
RPG
2.3
APG
0.7
TOV/G
1.3
3PM/G
58%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
11.0
P87
Playmaking
2.3
P77
Rebounding
5.9
P85
True shooting
58%
P94
Two-way impact
+76.4
P100
Stops
74%
P89
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
48%
28 made / 59 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
43%
9 made / 21 attempts
FT
Free throws
75%
12 made / 16 attempts
Shot selection
36% of attempts from three
●2PA 38●3PA 21
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
77
PTS
11.0 / game
28–59
FGM–FGA
9–21
3PM–3PA
12–16
FTM–FTA
creation
16
AST
2.3 / game
5
TOV
0.7 / game
3.20×
AST:TOV
10
FD
rebounding
41
REB
5.9 / game
22
OREB
19
DREB
5.9
REB/G
defense
15
STL
2.1 / game
10
BLK
1.4 / game
8
PF
25
STL+BLK
3.6 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
100.0
HESI
94.5
PI
140.5
ORtg
64.1
DRtg
+76.4
NRtg
+54.3
Stable NRtg
74%
Stop%
63%
Floor%
55%
eFG%
13%
PIE
66.5
Team DRtg
+2.4
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
//top_of_the_board
No one ranks above this player in the event.
//current_rank
#1
of 192 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#2
Spain
12.4 PPG 7.0 RPG 1.9 APG
//event_signalTop 3#2 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#3
United States
12.9 PPG 6.0 RPG 1.7 APG
//event_signalDisruptor3.4 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalTop 3#3 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#4
#5
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
11.0
PPG
5.9
RPG
2.3
APG
2.1
SPG
1.4
BPG
43%
3P%
58%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #1
//quick_read
The line at a glance
11.0
PPG
5.9
RPG
2.3
APG
0.7
TOV/G
1.3
3PM/G
58%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
11.0
P87
Playmaking
2.3
P77
Rebounding
5.9
P85
True shooting
58%
P94
Two-way impact
+76.4
P100
Stops
74%
P89
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
48%
28 made / 59 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
43%
9 made / 21 attempts
FT
Free throws
75%
12 made / 16 attempts
Shot selection
36% of attempts from three
●2PA 38●3PA 21
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
77
PTS
11.0 / game
28–59
FGM–FGA
9–21
3PM–3PA
12–16
FTM–FTA
creation
16
AST
2.3 / game
5
TOV
0.7 / game
3.20×
AST:TOV
10
FD
rebounding
41
REB
5.9 / game
22
OREB
19
DREB
5.9
REB/G
defense
15
STL
2.1 / game
10
BLK
1.4 / game
8
PF
25
STL+BLK
3.6 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
100.0
HESI
94.5
PI
140.5
ORtg
64.1
DRtg
+76.4
NRtg
+54.3
Stable NRtg
74%
Stop%
63%
Floor%
55%
eFG%
13%
PIE
66.5
Team DRtg
+2.4
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.