back_to_rankings
Eve Long portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Eve Long

USA · b. 2009

//measurables

190 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Two-way event impact

Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

//event_signalEvent Impact99.0 HESI performance · 99th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalOffensive Impact131.0 ORtg · 99th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection1.3 BPG · 95th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Efficiency57% TS on 12.0 PPG · 92nd event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

56.6% TSScoring efficiency · 92nd event percentile

12.0 PPGScoring load · 90th event percentile

99.0
HESI v2.1
#4
of 192
71%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

Rank #4 of 192 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

99.0

Event performance

99th event percentile

PI

93.7

Prospect index

98th event percentile

ORtg

131.0

Points / 100 poss.

99th event percentile

DRtg

72.3

Lower is better

83rd event percentile

NRtg

+58.7

Two-way margin

99th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 131.0 · 99th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 72.3 · Stop% 54.8% · Team DRtg 66.5

Sample context

7 games · 147 minutes · 71% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Two-way event impactevent-relative description

Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring efficiency

56.6% TS92nd event percentile

Scoring load

12.0 PPG90th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?

  2. 02

    Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

99.0

99th event percentile

Prospect index

93.7

98th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

131.0

99th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

72.3

83rd event percentile

Two-way margin

+58.7

99th event percentile

Stop percentage

54.8%

44th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

12.0 PPG

90th event percentile

Creation

1.4 APG

58th event percentile

Rebounding

4.4 RPG

74th event percentile

Defensive activity

2.0 stocks

73rd event percentile

Scoring efficiency

56.6% TS

92nd event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P99

    Event Impact

    99.0 HESI performance · 99th event percentile

  • P99

    Offensive Impact

    131.0 ORtg · 99th event percentile

  • P95

    Rim Protection

    1.3 BPG · 95th event percentile

  • P92

    Event Efficiency

    57% TS on 12.0 PPG · 92nd event percentile

  • P90

    Scorer

    12.0 PPG · 90th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 99th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 131.0 ORtg and 72.3 DRtg, producing a +58.7 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are offensive efficiency, two-way margin, and scoring efficiency.

Relative strengths

  1. Offensive efficiency

    131.0 ORtg

    99th event percentile

    The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.

  2. Two-way margin

    +58.7 NRtg

    99th event percentile

    The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.

  3. Scoring efficiency

    56.6% TS

    92nd event percentile

    True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.

Relative weaknesses

No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

131.0

99th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

12.0 PPG

90th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

56.6%

92nd event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

48.4%

83rd event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

47.5%

91st event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

16.7%

context

0.9 attempts per game

Free throws

83.3%

87th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

63.1%

98th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.4 APG

58th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

72.3

83rd event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

66.5

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-5.8

21st event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

54.8%

44th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

2.0 STL+BLK

73rd event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

32.3

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+58.7

99th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+41.7

99th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

99.0

99th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

93.7

98th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

9.0%

91st event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

4.4 RPG

74th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

7

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

146.5

context

20.9 minutes per game.

Sample weight

70.9%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#4

context

Among 192 published players.

Team possessions

564.0

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

7

GP

12.0

PPG

4.4

RPG

1.4

APG

#4

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#4/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

12.0

PPG

4.4

RPG

1.4

APG

1.0

TOV/G

0.1

3PM/G

57%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

12.0

P90

Playmaking

1.4

P58

Rebounding

4.4

P74

True shooting

57%

P92

Two-way impact

+58.7

P99

Stops

55%

P44

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

48%

29 made / 61 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

17%

1 made / 6 attempts

FT

Free throws

83%

25 made / 30 attempts

Shot selection

10% of attempts from three

2PA 553PA 6

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

84

PTS

12.0 / game

29–61

FGM–FGA

1–6

3PM–3PA

25–30

FTM–FTA

creation

10

AST

1.4 / game

7

TOV

1.0 / game

1.43×

AST:TOV

21

FD

rebounding

31

REB

4.4 / game

16

OREB

15

DREB

4.4

REB/G

defense

5

STL

0.7 / game

9

BLK

1.3 / game

18

PF

14

STL+BLK

2.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

99.0

HESI

93.7

PI

131.0

ORtg

72.3

DRtg

+58.7

NRtg

+41.7

Stable NRtg

55%

Stop%

63%

Floor%

48%

eFG%

9%

PIE

66.5

Team DRtg

-5.8

Def. lift

sample_context

7 games147 minutes20.9 min/game71% sample weightrank #4 of 192
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.

  • Micah Ojo portrait#1

    Micah Ojo

    United States

    11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG

    //event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Amelia Alonso portrait#2

    Amelia Alonso

    Spain

    12.4 PPG 7.0 RPG 1.9 APG

    //event_signalTop 3#2 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Ivanna Wilson Manyacka portrait#3

    Ivanna Wilson Manyacka

    United States

    12.9 PPG 6.0 RPG 1.7 APG

    //event_signalDisruptor3.4 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalTop 3#3 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Arianna Robinson portrait#5

    Arianna Robinson

    United States

    10.1 PPG 2.7 RPG 1.4 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

7

GP

12.0

PPG

4.4

RPG

1.4

APG

0.7

SPG

1.3

BPG

17%

3P%

57%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

7 GP · event rank #4

//quick_read

The line at a glance

12.0

PPG

4.4

RPG

1.4

APG

1.0

TOV/G

0.1

3PM/G

57%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

12.0

P90

Playmaking

1.4

P58

Rebounding

4.4

P74

True shooting

57%

P92

Two-way impact

+58.7

P99

Stops

55%

P44

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

48%

29 made / 61 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

17%

1 made / 6 attempts

FT

Free throws

83%

25 made / 30 attempts

Shot selection

10% of attempts from three

2PA 553PA 6

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

84

PTS

12.0 / game

29–61

FGM–FGA

1–6

3PM–3PA

25–30

FTM–FTA

creation

10

AST

1.4 / game

7

TOV

1.0 / game

1.43×

AST:TOV

21

FD

rebounding

31

REB

4.4 / game

16

OREB

15

DREB

4.4

REB/G

defense

5

STL

0.7 / game

9

BLK

1.3 / game

18

PF

14

STL+BLK

2.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

99.0

HESI

93.7

PI

131.0

ORtg

72.3

DRtg

+58.7

NRtg

+41.7

Stable NRtg

55%

Stop%

63%

Floor%

48%

eFG%

9%

PIE

66.5

Team DRtg

-5.8

Def. lift

sample_context

7 games147 minutes20.9 min/game71% sample weightrank #4 of 192

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.