ORtg
131.0
99th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
USA · b. 2009
//measurables
190 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
56.6% TSScoring efficiency · 92nd event percentile
12.0 PPGScoring load · 90th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #4 of 192 · Established
HESI
99.0
Event performance
99th event percentile
PI
93.7
Prospect index
98th event percentile
ORtg
131.0
Points / 100 poss.
99th event percentile
DRtg
72.3
Lower is better
83rd event percentile
NRtg
+58.7
Two-way margin
99th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 131.0 · 99th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 72.3 · Stop% 54.8% · Team DRtg 66.5
Sample context
7 games · 147 minutes · 71% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
Scoring load
Questions for film
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
99.0
99th event percentile
Prospect index
93.7
98th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
131.0
99th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
72.3
83rd event percentile
Two-way margin
+58.7
99th event percentile
Stop percentage
54.8%
44th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
12.0 PPG
90th event percentile
Creation
1.4 APG
58th event percentile
Rebounding
4.4 RPG
74th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.0 stocks
73rd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
56.6% TS
92nd event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Event Impact
99.0 HESI performance · 99th event percentile
Offensive Impact
131.0 ORtg · 99th event percentile
Rim Protection
1.3 BPG · 95th event percentile
Event Efficiency
57% TS on 12.0 PPG · 92nd event percentile
Scorer
12.0 PPG · 90th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 99th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 131.0 ORtg and 72.3 DRtg, producing a +58.7 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are offensive efficiency, two-way margin, and scoring efficiency.
Offensive efficiency
131.0 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
Two-way margin
+58.7 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Scoring efficiency
56.6% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
131.0
99th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
12.0 PPG
90th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
56.6%
92nd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
48.4%
83rd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
47.5%
91st event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
16.7%
context0.9 attempts per game
Free throws
83.3%
87th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
63.1%
98th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.4 APG
58th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
72.3
83rd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
66.5
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-5.8
21st event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
54.8%
44th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.0 STL+BLK
73rd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
32.3
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+58.7
99th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+41.7
99th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
99.0
99th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
93.7
98th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
9.0%
91st event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
4.4 RPG
74th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
146.5
context20.9 minutes per game.
Sample weight
70.9%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#4
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
564.0
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
12.0
PPG
4.4
RPG
1.4
APG
#4
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
//quick_read
12.0
PPG
4.4
RPG
1.4
APG
1.0
TOV/G
0.1
3PM/G
57%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
12.0
P90
Playmaking
1.4
P58
Rebounding
4.4
P74
True shooting
57%
P92
Two-way impact
+58.7
P99
Stops
55%
P44
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
48%
29 made / 61 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
17%
1 made / 6 attempts
FT
Free throws
83%
25 made / 30 attempts
Shot selection
10% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
84
PTS
12.0 / game
29–61
FGM–FGA
1–6
3PM–3PA
25–30
FTM–FTA
creation
10
AST
1.4 / game
7
TOV
1.0 / game
1.43×
AST:TOV
21
FD
rebounding
31
REB
4.4 / game
16
OREB
15
DREB
4.4
REB/G
defense
5
STL
0.7 / game
9
BLK
1.3 / game
18
PF
14
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
99.0
HESI
93.7
PI
131.0
ORtg
72.3
DRtg
+58.7
NRtg
+41.7
Stable NRtg
55%
Stop%
63%
Floor%
48%
eFG%
9%
PIE
66.5
Team DRtg
-5.8
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
//current_rank
#4
of 192 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
12.0
PPG
4.4
RPG
1.4
APG
0.7
SPG
1.3
BPG
17%
3P%
57%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #4
//quick_read
12.0
PPG
4.4
RPG
1.4
APG
1.0
TOV/G
0.1
3PM/G
57%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
12.0
P90
Playmaking
1.4
P58
Rebounding
4.4
P74
True shooting
57%
P92
Two-way impact
+58.7
P99
Stops
55%
P44
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
48%
29 made / 61 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
17%
1 made / 6 attempts
FT
Free throws
83%
25 made / 30 attempts
Shot selection
10% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
84
PTS
12.0 / game
29–61
FGM–FGA
1–6
3PM–3PA
25–30
FTM–FTA
creation
10
AST
1.4 / game
7
TOV
1.0 / game
1.43×
AST:TOV
21
FD
rebounding
31
REB
4.4 / game
16
OREB
15
DREB
4.4
REB/G
defense
5
STL
0.7 / game
9
BLK
1.3 / game
18
PF
14
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
99.0
HESI
93.7
PI
131.0
ORtg
72.3
DRtg
+58.7
NRtg
+41.7
Stable NRtg
55%
Stop%
63%
Floor%
48%
eFG%
9%
PIE
66.5
Team DRtg
-5.8
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.