ORtg
120.2
96th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Arianna Robinson
USA · b. 2010
//measurables
178 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileTwo-way event impact
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalEvent Impact96.9 HESI performance · 97th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalOffensive Impact120.2 ORtg · 96th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalTwo-Way Impact+54.6 Net Rating · 94th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Efficiency55% TS on 10.1 PPG · 89th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
55.1% TSScoring efficiency · 89th event percentile
10.1 PPGScoring load · 83rd event percentile
- 96.9
- HESI v2.1
- #5
- of 192
- 66%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #5 of 192 · Established
HESI
96.9
Event performance
97th event percentile
PI
93.2
Prospect index
98th event percentile
ORtg
120.2
Points / 100 poss.
96th event percentile
DRtg
65.5
Lower is better
92nd event percentile
NRtg
+54.6
Two-way margin
98th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 120.2 · 96th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 65.5 · Stop% 70.8% · Team DRtg 66.5
Sample context
7 games · 115 minutes · 66% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Two-way event impactevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
55.1% TS89th event percentile
Scoring load
10.1 PPG83rd event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
96.9
97th event percentile
Prospect index
93.2
98th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
120.2
96th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
65.5
92nd event percentile
Two-way margin
+54.6
98th event percentile
Stop percentage
70.8%
85th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
10.1 PPG
83rd event percentile
Creation
1.4 APG
58th event percentile
Rebounding
2.7 RPG
47th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.3 stocks
66th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
55.1% TS
89th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P97
Event Impact
96.9 HESI performance · 97th event percentile
- P96
Offensive Impact
120.2 ORtg · 96th event percentile
- P94
Two-Way Impact
+54.6 Net Rating · 94th event percentile
- P89
Event Efficiency
55% TS on 10.1 PPG · 89th event percentile
- P89
Defensive Impact
65.5 DRtg · 71% Stop% · 89th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 97th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 120.2 ORtg and 65.5 DRtg, producing a +54.6 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are two-way margin, offensive efficiency, and defensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 98th event percentile
Two-way margin
+54.6 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
- 96th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
120.2 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
- 92nd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
65.5 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Relative weaknesses
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
10.1 PPG
83rd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
55.1%
89th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
48.1%
82nd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
47.2%
90th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
11.1%
context1.3 attempts per game
Free throws
76.9%
80th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
58.6%
97th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.4 APG
58th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
65.5
92nd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
66.5
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+1.0
73rd event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
70.8%
85th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.3 STL+BLK
66th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
32.8
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+54.6
98th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+36.0
97th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
96.9
97th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
93.2
98th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
8.0%
86th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
2.7 RPG
47th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
115.0
context16.4 minutes per game.
Sample weight
65.7%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#5
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
564.0
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
10.1
PPG
2.7
RPG
1.4
APG
#5
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#5/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
10.1
PPG
2.7
RPG
1.4
APG
1.3
TOV/G
0.1
3PM/G
55%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
10.1
P83
Playmaking
1.4
P58
Rebounding
2.7
P47
True shooting
55%
P89
Two-way impact
+54.6
P98
Stops
71%
P85
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
47%
25 made / 53 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
11%
1 made / 9 attempts
FT
Free throws
77%
20 made / 26 attempts
Shot selection
17% of attempts from three
●2PA 44●3PA 9
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
71
PTS
10.1 / game
25–53
FGM–FGA
1–9
3PM–3PA
20–26
FTM–FTA
creation
10
AST
1.4 / game
9
TOV
1.3 / game
1.11×
AST:TOV
17
FD
rebounding
19
REB
2.7 / game
10
OREB
9
DREB
2.7
REB/G
defense
15
STL
2.1 / game
1
BLK
0.1 / game
10
PF
16
STL+BLK
2.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
96.9
HESI
93.2
PI
120.2
ORtg
65.5
DRtg
+54.6
NRtg
+36.0
Stable NRtg
71%
Stop%
59%
Floor%
48%
eFG%
8%
PIE
66.5
Team DRtg
+1.0
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
rank_above · #4Eve LongUnited Statesrank_below · #6Isabel HernandezSpain
//current_rank
#5
of 192 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#1
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#3
United States
12.9 PPG 6.0 RPG 1.7 APG
//event_signalDisruptor3.4 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalTop 3#3 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#4
#6
Spain
17.0 PPG 2.3 RPG 4.7 APG
//event_signalDisruptor3.9 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
10.1
PPG
2.7
RPG
1.4
APG
2.1
SPG
0.1
BPG
11%
3P%
55%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #5
//quick_read
The line at a glance
10.1
PPG
2.7
RPG
1.4
APG
1.3
TOV/G
0.1
3PM/G
55%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
10.1
P83
Playmaking
1.4
P58
Rebounding
2.7
P47
True shooting
55%
P89
Two-way impact
+54.6
P98
Stops
71%
P85
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
47%
25 made / 53 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
11%
1 made / 9 attempts
FT
Free throws
77%
20 made / 26 attempts
Shot selection
17% of attempts from three
●2PA 44●3PA 9
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
71
PTS
10.1 / game
25–53
FGM–FGA
1–9
3PM–3PA
20–26
FTM–FTA
creation
10
AST
1.4 / game
9
TOV
1.3 / game
1.11×
AST:TOV
17
FD
rebounding
19
REB
2.7 / game
10
OREB
9
DREB
2.7
REB/G
defense
15
STL
2.1 / game
1
BLK
0.1 / game
10
PF
16
STL+BLK
2.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
96.9
HESI
93.2
PI
120.2
ORtg
65.5
DRtg
+54.6
NRtg
+36.0
Stable NRtg
71%
Stop%
59%
Floor%
48%
eFG%
8%
PIE
66.5
Team DRtg
+1.0
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.