ORtg
118.1
95th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Amelia Alonso
ESP · b. 2010
//measurables
188 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileTwo-way event impact
Scoring load and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalEvent Impact98.4 HESI performance · 98th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalOffensive Impact118.1 ORtg · 95th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalScorer12.4 PPG · 93rd event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalTwo-Way Impact+54.2 Net Rating · 93rd event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
12.4 PPGScoring load · 93rd event percentile
7.0 RPGRebounding · 92nd event percentile
- 98.4
- HESI v2.1
- #2
- of 192
- 70%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #2 of 192 · Established
HESI
98.4
Event performance
98th event percentile
PI
94.4
Prospect index
99th event percentile
ORtg
118.1
Points / 100 poss.
95th event percentile
DRtg
63.9
Lower is better
93rd event percentile
NRtg
+54.2
Two-way margin
98th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 118.1 · 95th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 63.9 · Stop% 68.9% · Team DRtg 63.6
Sample context
7 games · 139 minutes · 70% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Two-way event impactevent-relative description
Scoring load and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring load
12.4 PPG93rd event percentile
Rebounding
7.0 RPG92nd event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
- 02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
98.4
98th event percentile
Prospect index
94.4
99th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
118.1
95th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
63.9
93rd event percentile
Two-way margin
+54.2
98th event percentile
Stop percentage
68.9%
79th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
12.4 PPG
93rd event percentile
Creation
1.9 APG
70th event percentile
Rebounding
7.0 RPG
92nd event percentile
Defensive activity
1.6 stocks
69th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
44.8% TS
61st event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P98
Event Impact
98.4 HESI performance · 98th event percentile
- P95
Offensive Impact
118.1 ORtg · 95th event percentile
- P93
Scorer
12.4 PPG · 93rd event percentile
- P93
Two-Way Impact
+54.2 Net Rating · 93rd event percentile
- P92
Rebounder
7.0 RPG · 92nd event percentile
- P86
Defensive Impact
63.9 DRtg · 69% Stop% · 86th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 98th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 118.1 ORtg and 63.9 DRtg, producing a +54.2 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are two-way margin, offensive efficiency, and defensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 98th event percentile
Two-way margin
+54.2 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
- 95th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
118.1 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
- 93rd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
63.9 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Relative weaknesses
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
12.4 PPG
93rd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
44.8%
61st event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
38.6%
53rd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
36.1%
59th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
13.8%
context4.1 attempts per game
Free throws
71.9%
72nd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
56.4%
96th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.9 APG
70th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
63.9
93rd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
63.6
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-0.3
65th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
68.9%
79th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.6 STL+BLK
69th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
36.2
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+54.2
98th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+37.9
98th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
98.4
98th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
94.4
99th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
12.0%
89th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
7.0 RPG
92nd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
139.0
context19.9 minutes per game.
Sample weight
69.8%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#2
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
530.0
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
12.4
PPG
7.0
RPG
1.9
APG
#2
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#2/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
12.4
PPG
7.0
RPG
1.9
APG
0.6
TOV/G
0.6
3PM/G
45%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
12.4
P93
Playmaking
1.9
P70
Rebounding
7.0
P92
True shooting
45%
P61
Two-way impact
+54.2
P98
Stops
69%
P79
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
36%
30 made / 83 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
14%
4 made / 29 attempts
FT
Free throws
72%
23 made / 32 attempts
Shot selection
35% of attempts from three
●2PA 54●3PA 29
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
87
PTS
12.4 / game
30–83
FGM–FGA
4–29
3PM–3PA
23–32
FTM–FTA
creation
13
AST
1.9 / game
4
TOV
0.6 / game
3.25×
AST:TOV
20
FD
rebounding
49
REB
7.0 / game
25
OREB
24
DREB
7.0
REB/G
defense
8
STL
1.1 / game
3
BLK
0.4 / game
21
PF
11
STL+BLK
1.6 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
98.4
HESI
94.4
PI
118.1
ORtg
63.9
DRtg
+54.2
NRtg
+37.9
Stable NRtg
69%
Stop%
56%
Floor%
39%
eFG%
12%
PIE
63.6
Team DRtg
-0.3
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
rank_above · #1Micah OjoUnited Statesrank_below · #3Ivanna Wilson ManyackaUnited States
//current_rank
#2
of 192 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#1
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#3
United States
12.9 PPG 6.0 RPG 1.7 APG
//event_signalDisruptor3.4 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalTop 3#3 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#4
#5
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
12.4
PPG
7.0
RPG
1.9
APG
1.1
SPG
0.4
BPG
14%
3P%
45%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #2
//quick_read
The line at a glance
12.4
PPG
7.0
RPG
1.9
APG
0.6
TOV/G
0.6
3PM/G
45%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
12.4
P93
Playmaking
1.9
P70
Rebounding
7.0
P92
True shooting
45%
P61
Two-way impact
+54.2
P98
Stops
69%
P79
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
36%
30 made / 83 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
14%
4 made / 29 attempts
FT
Free throws
72%
23 made / 32 attempts
Shot selection
35% of attempts from three
●2PA 54●3PA 29
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
87
PTS
12.4 / game
30–83
FGM–FGA
4–29
3PM–3PA
23–32
FTM–FTA
creation
13
AST
1.9 / game
4
TOV
0.6 / game
3.25×
AST:TOV
20
FD
rebounding
49
REB
7.0 / game
25
OREB
24
DREB
7.0
REB/G
defense
8
STL
1.1 / game
3
BLK
0.4 / game
21
PF
11
STL+BLK
1.6 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
98.4
HESI
94.4
PI
118.1
ORtg
63.9
DRtg
+54.2
NRtg
+37.9
Stable NRtg
69%
Stop%
56%
Floor%
39%
eFG%
12%
PIE
63.6
Team DRtg
-0.3
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.