ORtg
83.1
48th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Mariana Nako Moni
ITA · b. 2009
//measurables
191 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileRebounding-led profile
Rebounding and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalRebounder6.0 RPG · 87th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
6.0 RPGRebounding · 87th event percentile
51.2% TSScoring efficiency · 83rd event percentile
- 41.4
- HESI v2.1
- #113
- of 192
- 73%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #113 of 192 · Established
HESI
41.4
Event performance
41st event percentile
PI
47.6
Prospect index
41st event percentile
ORtg
83.1
Points / 100 poss.
48th event percentile
DRtg
88.3
Lower is better
29th event percentile
NRtg
-5.2
Two-way margin
42nd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 83.1 · 48th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 88.3 · Stop% 54.4% · Team DRtg 86.3
Sample context
7 games · 164 minutes · 73% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding-led profileevent-relative description
Rebounding and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
6.0 RPG87th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
51.2% TS83rd event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 02
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
41.4
41st event percentile
Prospect index
47.6
41st event percentile
Offensive efficiency
83.1
48th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
88.3
29th event percentile
Two-way margin
-5.2
42nd event percentile
Stop percentage
54.4%
42nd event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
5.3 PPG
57th event percentile
Creation
0.6 APG
24th event percentile
Rebounding
6.0 RPG
87th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.3 stocks
63rd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
51.2% TS
83rd event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P87
Rebounder
6.0 RPG · 87th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 41st event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 83.1 ORtg and 88.3 DRtg, producing a -5.2 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are rebounding and scoring efficiency. The lowest relative areas are creation and defensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 87th event percentile
Rebounding
6.0 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
- 83rd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
51.2% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Relative weaknesses
- 24th event percentile
Creation
0.6 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
- 29th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
88.3 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
5.3 PPG
57th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
51.2%
83rd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
42.3%
64th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
42.3%
83rd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Free throws
65.2%
60th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
41.9%
64th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.6 APG
24th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
88.3
29th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
86.3
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-2.0
53rd event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
54.4%
42nd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.3 STL+BLK
63rd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
33.5
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-5.2
42nd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-3.8
41st event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
41.4
41st event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
47.6
41st event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
3.3%
53rd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
6.0 RPG
87th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
164.4
context23.5 minutes per game.
Sample weight
73.3%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#113
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
525.1
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
5.3
PPG
6.0
RPG
0.6
APG
#113
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#113/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
5.3
PPG
6.0
RPG
0.6
APG
2.4
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
51%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
5.3
P57
Playmaking
0.6
P24
Rebounding
6.0
P87
True shooting
51%
P83
Two-way impact
-5.2
P42
Stops
54%
P42
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
42%
11 made / 26 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
65%
15 made / 23 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 26●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
37
PTS
5.3 / game
11–26
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
15–23
FTM–FTA
creation
4
AST
0.6 / game
17
TOV
2.4 / game
0.24×
AST:TOV
14
FD
rebounding
42
REB
6.0 / game
24
OREB
18
DREB
6.0
REB/G
defense
6
STL
0.9 / game
3
BLK
0.4 / game
20
PF
9
STL+BLK
1.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
41.4
HESI
47.6
PI
83.1
ORtg
88.3
DRtg
-5.2
NRtg
-3.8
Stable NRtg
54%
Stop%
42%
Floor%
42%
eFG%
3%
PIE
86.3
Team DRtg
-2.0
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#1
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#111
#112
#114
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
5.3
PPG
6.0
RPG
0.6
APG
0.9
SPG
0.4
BPG
—
3P%
51%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #113
//quick_read
The line at a glance
5.3
PPG
6.0
RPG
0.6
APG
2.4
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
51%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
5.3
P57
Playmaking
0.6
P24
Rebounding
6.0
P87
True shooting
51%
P83
Two-way impact
-5.2
P42
Stops
54%
P42
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
42%
11 made / 26 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
65%
15 made / 23 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 26●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
37
PTS
5.3 / game
11–26
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
15–23
FTM–FTA
creation
4
AST
0.6 / game
17
TOV
2.4 / game
0.24×
AST:TOV
14
FD
rebounding
42
REB
6.0 / game
24
OREB
18
DREB
6.0
REB/G
defense
6
STL
0.9 / game
3
BLK
0.4 / game
20
PF
9
STL+BLK
1.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
41.4
HESI
47.6
PI
83.1
ORtg
88.3
DRtg
-5.2
NRtg
-3.8
Stable NRtg
54%
Stop%
42%
Floor%
42%
eFG%
3%
PIE
86.3
Team DRtg
-2.0
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.