Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026

Roi Honda

Shooting Guard · JPN · b. 2008

//measurables

189 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Defensive activity-led profile

Defensive activity and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

1.0 stocksDefensive activity · 59th event percentile

6.3 PPGScoring load · 54th event percentile

58.3
HESI v2.1: #79
of 188: 66%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

Rank #79 of 188 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

58.3

Event performance

58th event percentile

58.1

Prospect index

58th event percentile

ORtg

92.1

Points / 100 poss.

49th event percentile

DRtg

94.9

Lower is better

71st event percentile

NRtg

-2.8

Two-way margin

57th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 92.1 · 49th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 94.9 · Stop% 52.5% · Team DRtg 93.1

Sample context

7 games · 114 minutes · 66% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Defensive activity-led profileevent-relative description

Defensive activity and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Defensive activity

1.0 stocks59th event percentile

Scoring load

6.3 PPG54th event percentile

Questions for film

01
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

58.3

58th event percentile

Prospect index

58.1

58th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

92.1

49th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

94.9

71st event percentile

Two-way margin

-2.8

57th event percentile

Stop percentage

52.5%

57th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

6.3 PPG

54th event percentile

Creation

1.1 APG

50th event percentile

Rebounding

2.7 RPG

51st event percentile

Defensive activity

1.0 stocks

59th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

41.9% TS

37th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 58th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 92.1 ORtg and 94.9 DRtg, producing a -2.8 Net Rating. The clearest relative strength is defensive efficiency. The lowest relative area is scoring efficiency.

Relative strengths

Defensive efficiency
94.9 DRtg
71st event percentile
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.

Relative weaknesses

Scoring efficiency
41.9% TS
37th event percentile
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

92.1

49th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

6.3 PPG

54th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

41.9%

37th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

31.1%

25th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

26.7%

23rd event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

26.7%

context

2.1 attempts per game

Free throws

94.1%

88th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

39.3%

46th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.1 APG

50th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

94.9

71st event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

93.1

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-1.8

52nd event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

52.5%

57th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.0 STL+BLK

59th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

22.7

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-2.8

57th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-4.6

58th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

58.3

58th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

58.1

58th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

3.1%

58th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

2.7 RPG

51st event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

114.0

context

16.3 minutes per game.

Sample weight

65.5%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#79

context

Among 188 published players.

Team possessions

531.5

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

6.3

PPG

2.7

RPG

1.1

APG

#79

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

#79/188view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

6.3

PPG

2.7

RPG

1.1

APG

1.3

TOV/G

0.6

3PM/G

42%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

6.3

P54

Playmaking

1.1

P50

Rebounding

2.7

P51

True shooting

42%

P37

Two-way impact

-2.8

P57

Stops

53%

P57

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

27%

12 made / 45 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

27%

4 made / 15 attempts

Free throws

94%

16 made / 17 attempts

Shot selection

33% of attempts from three

●2PA 30●3PA 15

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

6.3 / game

12–45

FGM–FGA

4–15

3PM–3PA

16–17

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

1.1 / game

TOV

1.3 / game

0.89×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

2.7 / game

OREB

DREB

2.7

REB/G

defense

STL

0.6 / game

BLK

0.4 / game

STL+BLK

1.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

58.3

HESI

58.1

92.1

ORtg

94.9

DRtg

-2.8

NRtg

-4.6

Stable NRtg

53%

Stop%

39%

Floor%

31%

eFG%

PIE

93.1

Team DRtg

-1.8

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.

rank_above · #78Kianmehr204 Kouchaki HasankiadehPF

//current_rank

#79

of 188 ranked

rank_below · #80ELIAS TROY GISHSG · PHI, USA

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

6.3

PPG

2.7

RPG

1.1

APG

0.6

SPG

0.4

BPG

27%

3P%

42%

TS%

event_stats