Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026

Kianmehr204 Kouchaki Hasankiadeh

Power Forward

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Scoring efficiency-led profile

Scoring efficiency and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

51.8% TSScoring efficiency · 66th event percentile

4.0 RPGRebounding · 66th event percentile

58.8
HESI v2.1: #78
of 188: 68%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

Rank #78 of 188 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

58.8

Event performance

59th event percentile

58.6

Prospect index

59th event percentile

ORtg

99.2

Points / 100 poss.

60th event percentile

DRtg

101.9

Lower is better

50th event percentile

NRtg

-2.8

Two-way margin

58th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 99.2 · 60th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 101.9 · Stop% 39.5% · Team DRtg 94.0

Sample context

7 games · 129 minutes · 68% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description

Scoring efficiency and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring efficiency

51.8% TS66th event percentile

Rebounding

4.0 RPG66th event percentile

Questions for film

01
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

58.8

59th event percentile

Prospect index

58.6

59th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

99.2

60th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

101.9

50th event percentile

Two-way margin

-2.8

58th event percentile

Stop percentage

39.5%

22nd event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

6.3 PPG

54th event percentile

Creation

0.4 APG

26th event percentile

Rebounding

4.0 RPG

66th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.6 stocks

44th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

51.8% TS

66th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 59th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 99.2 ORtg and 101.9 DRtg, producing a -2.8 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring efficiency and rebounding. The lowest relative areas are defensive stops and creation.

Relative strengths

Scoring efficiency
51.8% TS
66th event percentile
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Rebounding
4.0 RPG
66th event percentile
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.

Relative weaknesses

Defensive stops
39.5% Stop%
22nd event percentile
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
Creation
0.4 APG
26th event percentile
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

99.2

60th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

6.3 PPG

54th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

51.8%

66th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

57.1%

82nd event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

57.1%

90th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Free throws

23.5%

8th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

50.2%

74th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.4 APG

26th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

101.9

50th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

94.0

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-7.9

11th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

39.5%

22nd event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.6 STL+BLK

44th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

20.8

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-2.8

58th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-4.4

59th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

58.8

59th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

58.6

59th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

2.7%

58th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

4.0 RPG

66th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

129.3

context

18.5 minutes per game.

Sample weight

68.3%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#78

context

Among 188 published players.

Team possessions

569.0

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

6.3

PPG

4.0

RPG

0.4

APG

#78

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

#78/188view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

6.3

PPG

4.0

RPG

0.4

APG

1.1

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

52%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

6.3

P54

Playmaking

0.4

P26

Rebounding

4.0

P66

True shooting

52%

P66

Two-way impact

-2.8

P58

Stops

40%

P22

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

57%

20 made / 35 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

—

0 made / 0 attempts

Free throws

24%

4 made / 17 attempts

Shot selection

0% of attempts from three

●2PA 35●3PA 0

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

6.3 / game

20–35

FGM–FGA

0–0

3PM–3PA

4–17

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

0.4 / game

TOV

1.1 / game

0.38×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

4.0 / game

OREB

DREB

4.0

REB/G

defense

STL

0.3 / game

BLK

0.3 / game

STL+BLK

0.6 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

58.8

HESI

58.6

99.2

ORtg

101.9

DRtg

-2.8

NRtg

-4.4

Stable NRtg

40%

Stop%

50%

Floor%

57%

eFG%

PIE

94.0

Team DRtg

-7.9

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.

rank_above · #77Shao-En HuangF · TPE

//current_rank

#78

of 188 ranked

rank_below · #79Roi HondaSG · JPN

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

6.3

PPG

4.0

RPG

0.4

APG

0.3

SPG

0.3

BPG

—

3P%

52%

TS%

event_stats