Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026

AmirReza Azari

Power Forward · IRI · b. 2009

//measurables

197 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Rebounding-led profile

Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

7.3 RPGRebounding · 91st event percentile

10.4 PPGScoring load · 79th event percentile

59.9
HESI v2.1: #76
of 188: 73%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

Rank #76 of 188 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

59.9

Event performance

60th event percentile

59.4

Prospect index

60th event percentile

ORtg

96.0

Points / 100 poss.

56th event percentile

DRtg

98.1

Lower is better

62nd event percentile

NRtg

-2.1

Two-way margin

59th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 96.0 · 56th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 98.1 · Stop% 48.2% · Team DRtg 94.0

Sample context

7 games · 164 minutes · 73% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Rebounding-led profileevent-relative description

Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Rebounding

7.3 RPG91st event percentile

Scoring load

10.4 PPG79th event percentile

Questions for film

01
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

59.9

60th event percentile

Prospect index

59.4

60th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

96.0

56th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

98.1

62nd event percentile

Two-way margin

-2.1

59th event percentile

Stop percentage

48.2%

44th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

10.4 PPG

79th event percentile

Creation

1.6 APG

64th event percentile

Rebounding

7.3 RPG

91st event percentile

Defensive activity

0.4 stocks

31st event percentile

Scoring efficiency

47.1% TS

52nd event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

P91
Rebounder
7.3 RPG · 91st event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 60th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 96.0 ORtg and 98.1 DRtg, producing a -2.1 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are rebounding and scoring load. The lowest relative area is defensive activity.

Relative strengths

Rebounding
7.3 RPG
91st event percentile
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Scoring load
10.4 PPG
79th event percentile
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.

Relative weaknesses

Defensive activity
0.4 steals + blocks/G
31st event percentile
Recorded steals and blocks are a lower relative area; this does not measure positioning, containment, or communication.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

96.0

56th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

10.4 PPG

79th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

47.1%

52nd event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

44.3%

53rd event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

44.3%

69th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

0.0%

context

1.7 attempts per game

Free throws

64.7%

45th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

47.4%

65th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.6 APG

64th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

98.1

62nd event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

94.0

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-4.1

35th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

48.2%

44th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.4 STL+BLK

31st event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

32.0

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-2.1

59th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-3.7

60th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

59.9

60th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

59.4

60th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

5.5%

82nd event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

7.3 RPG

91st event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

163.6

context

23.4 minutes per game.

Sample weight

73.2%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#76

context

Among 188 published players.

Team possessions

569.0

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

10.4

PPG

7.3

RPG

1.6

APG

#76

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

#76/188view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

10.4

PPG

7.3

RPG

1.6

APG

2.3

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

47%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

10.4

P79

Playmaking

1.6

P64

Rebounding

7.3

P91

True shooting

47%

P52

Two-way impact

-2.1

P59

Stops

48%

P44

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

44%

31 made / 70 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0 made / 12 attempts

Free throws

65%

11 made / 17 attempts

Shot selection

17% of attempts from three

●2PA 58●3PA 12

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

10.4 / game

31–70

FGM–FGA

0–12

3PM–3PA

11–17

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

1.6 / game

TOV

2.3 / game

0.69×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

7.3 / game

OREB

DREB

7.3

REB/G

defense

STL

0.4 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

0.4 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

59.9

HESI

59.4

96.0

ORtg

98.1

DRtg

-2.1

NRtg

-3.7

Stable NRtg

48%

Stop%

47%

Floor%

44%

eFG%

PIE

94.0

Team DRtg

-4.1

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.

rank_above · #75Ansh TomerC · IND

//current_rank

#76

of 188 ranked

rank_below · #77Shao-En HuangF · TPE

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

10.4

PPG

7.3

RPG

1.6

APG

0.4

SPG

0.0

BPG

3P%

47%

TS%

event_stats