ORtg
104.5
66th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026
Ansh Tomer
Center · IND · b. 2011
//measurables
205 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileRebounding-led profile
Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalRebounder8.5 RPG · 95th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection1.0 BPG · 88th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalActivity8.5 RPG + 1.8 defensive plays/G · 80th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
8.5 RPGRebounding · 95th event percentile
11.3 PPGScoring load · 85th event percentile
- 60.4
- HESI v2.1
- #75
- of 188
- 69%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #75 of 188 · Provisional
HESI
60.4
Event performance
60th event percentile
PI
59.8
Prospect index
60th event percentile
ORtg
104.5
Points / 100 poss.
66th event percentile
DRtg
105.5
Lower is better
37th event percentile
NRtg
-1.1
Two-way margin
60th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 104.5 · 66th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 105.5 · Stop% 50.8% · Team DRtg 103.0
Sample context
4 games · 131 minutes · 69% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding-led profileevent-relative description
Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
8.5 RPG95th event percentile
Scoring load
11.3 PPG85th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 03
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
60.4
60th event percentile
Prospect index
59.8
60th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
104.5
66th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
105.5
37th event percentile
Two-way margin
-1.1
60th event percentile
Stop percentage
50.8%
52nd event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
11.3 PPG
85th event percentile
Creation
1.3 APG
53rd event percentile
Rebounding
8.5 RPG
95th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.8 stocks
72nd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
47.6% TS
53rd event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P95
Rebounder
8.5 RPG · 95th event percentile
- P88
Rim Protection
1.0 BPG · 88th event percentile
- P80
Activity
8.5 RPG + 1.8 defensive plays/G · 80th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 60th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 104.5 ORtg and 105.5 DRtg, producing a -1.1 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are rebounding, scoring load, and defensive activity. The lowest relative area is defensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 95th event percentile
Rebounding
8.5 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
- 85th event percentile
Scoring load
11.3 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
- 72nd event percentile
Defensive activity
1.8 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
Relative weaknesses
- 37th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
105.5 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
11.3 PPG
85th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
47.6%
53rd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
42.9%
46th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
40.5%
54th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
28.6%
context1.8 attempts per game
Free throws
75.0%
66th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
49.6%
72nd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.3 APG
53rd event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
105.5
37th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
103.0
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-2.6
48th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
50.8%
52nd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.8 STL+BLK
72nd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
26.2
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-1.1
60th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-3.2
60th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
60.4
60th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
59.8
60th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
8.6%
77th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
8.5 RPG
95th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
4
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
130.6
context32.6 minutes per game.
Sample weight
68.5%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#75
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
315.6
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
4
GP
11.3
PPG
8.5
RPG
1.3
APG
#75
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
#75/188view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
11.3
PPG
8.5
RPG
1.3
APG
1.3
TOV/G
0.5
3PM/G
48%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
11.3
P85
Playmaking
1.3
P53
Rebounding
8.5
P95
True shooting
48%
P53
Two-way impact
-1.1
P60
Stops
51%
P52
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
41%
17 made / 42 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
29%
2 made / 7 attempts
FT
Free throws
75%
9 made / 12 attempts
Shot selection
17% of attempts from three
●2PA 35●3PA 7
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
45
PTS
11.3 / game
17–42
FGM–FGA
2–7
3PM–3PA
9–12
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
1.3 / game
5
TOV
1.3 / game
1.00×
AST:TOV
10
FD
rebounding
34
REB
8.5 / game
14
OREB
20
DREB
8.5
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.8 / game
4
BLK
1.0 / game
3
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
60.4
HESI
59.8
PI
104.5
ORtg
105.5
DRtg
-1.1
NRtg
-3.2
Stable NRtg
51%
Stop%
50%
Floor%
43%
eFG%
9%
PIE
103.0
Team DRtg
-2.6
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
rank_above · #74MohammadSafa BehniaC · IRIrank_below · #76AmirReza AzariPF · IRI
//current_rank
#75
of 188 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
#1
Center · AUS
15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG
//event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#73
Point Guard · BRN
5.5 PPG 0.8 RPG 1.5 APG
//event_signalShooter50% 3PT on 2.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#74
Center · IRI
8.0 PPG 1.1 RPG 3.4 APG
//event_signalShooter36% 3PT on 4.7 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#76
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
11.3
PPG
8.5
RPG
1.3
APG
0.8
SPG
1.0
BPG
29%
3P%
48%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
4 GP · event rank #75
//quick_read
The line at a glance
11.3
PPG
8.5
RPG
1.3
APG
1.3
TOV/G
0.5
3PM/G
48%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
11.3
P85
Playmaking
1.3
P53
Rebounding
8.5
P95
True shooting
48%
P53
Two-way impact
-1.1
P60
Stops
51%
P52
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
41%
17 made / 42 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
29%
2 made / 7 attempts
FT
Free throws
75%
9 made / 12 attempts
Shot selection
17% of attempts from three
●2PA 35●3PA 7
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
45
PTS
11.3 / game
17–42
FGM–FGA
2–7
3PM–3PA
9–12
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
1.3 / game
5
TOV
1.3 / game
1.00×
AST:TOV
10
FD
rebounding
34
REB
8.5 / game
14
OREB
20
DREB
8.5
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.8 / game
4
BLK
1.0 / game
3
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
60.4
HESI
59.8
PI
104.5
ORtg
105.5
DRtg
-1.1
NRtg
-3.2
Stable NRtg
51%
Stop%
50%
Floor%
43%
eFG%
9%
PIE
103.0
Team DRtg
-2.6
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.