Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026

Ali Husain Mohamed

Point Guard · BRN · b. 2009

//measurables

173 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Scoring efficiency-led profile

Scoring efficiency and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

64.7% TSScoring efficiency · 90th event percentile

1.5 APGCreation · 61st event percentile

61.5
HESI v2.1: #73
of 188: 54%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

Rank #73 of 188 · Provisional

HESI v2.1

HESI

61.5

Event performance

61st event percentile

60.7

Prospect index

61st event percentile

ORtg

112.3

Points / 100 poss.

75th event percentile

DRtg

110.6

Lower is better

26th event percentile

NRtg

+1.6

Two-way margin

62nd event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 112.3 · 75th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 110.6 · Stop% 29.7% · Team DRtg 98.4

Sample context

4 games · 71 minutes · 54% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description

Scoring efficiency and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring efficiency

64.7% TS90th event percentile

Creation

1.5 APG61st event percentile

Questions for film

01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
03
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

61.5

61st event percentile

Prospect index

60.7

61st event percentile

Offensive efficiency

112.3

75th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

110.6

26th event percentile

Two-way margin

+1.6

62nd event percentile

Stop percentage

29.7%

7th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

5.5 PPG

46th event percentile

Creation

1.5 APG

61st event percentile

Rebounding

0.8 RPG

13th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.0 stocks

16th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

64.7% TS

90th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

Shooter
50% 3PT on 2.0 3PA/G

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 61st event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 112.3 ORtg and 110.6 DRtg, producing a +1.6 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring efficiency and offensive efficiency. The lowest relative areas are defensive stops, rebounding, and defensive activity.

Relative strengths

Scoring efficiency
64.7% TS
90th event percentile
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Offensive efficiency
112.3 ORtg
75th event percentile
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.

Relative weaknesses

Defensive stops
29.7% Stop%
7th event percentile
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
Rebounding
0.8 RPG
13th event percentile
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
Defensive activity
0.0 steals + blocks/G
16th event percentile
Recorded steals and blocks are a lower relative area; this does not measure positioning, containment, or communication.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

112.3

75th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

5.5 PPG

46th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

64.7%

90th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

64.7%

91st event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

52.9%

86th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

50.0%

context

2.0 attempts per game

Floor%

46.7%

65th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.5 APG

61st event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

110.6

26th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

98.4

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-12.2

2nd event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

29.7%

7th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.0 STL+BLK

16th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

8.8

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+1.6

62nd event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-2.8

61st event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

61.5

61st event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

60.7

61st event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

3.7%

47th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

0.8 RPG

13th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

70.5

context

17.6 minutes per game.

Sample weight

54.0%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Provisional

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#73

context

Among 188 published players.

Team possessions

336.4

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

5.5

PPG

0.8

RPG

1.5

APG

#73

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

#73/188view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

5.5

PPG

0.8

RPG

1.5

APG

1.0

TOV/G

1.0

3PM/G

65%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

5.5

P46

Playmaking

1.5

P61

Rebounding

0.8

P13

True shooting

65%

P90

Two-way impact

+1.6

P62

Stops

30%

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

53%

9 made / 17 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

50%

4 made / 8 attempts

Free throws

—

0 made / 0 attempts

Shot selection

47% of attempts from three

●2PA 9●3PA 8

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

5.5 / game

9–17

FGM–FGA

4–8

3PM–3PA

0–0

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

1.5 / game

TOV

1.0 / game

1.50×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

0.8 / game

OREB

DREB

0.8

REB/G

defense

STL

0.0 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

0.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

61.5

HESI

60.7

112.3

ORtg

110.6

DRtg

+1.6

NRtg

-2.8

Stable NRtg

30%

Stop%

47%

Floor%

65%

eFG%

PIE

98.4

Team DRtg

-12.2

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.

rank_above · #72Alireza RashidiSG · IRI

//current_rank

#73

of 188 ranked

rank_below · #74MohammadSafa BehniaC · IRI

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

5.5

PPG

0.8

RPG

1.5

APG

0.0

SPG

0.0

BPG

50%

3P%

65%

TS%

event_stats