ORtg
93.4
52nd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Power Forward · BRN, NGR · b. 2010
//measurables
187 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileRebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
16.5 RPGRebounding · 99th event percentile
19.5 PPGScoring load · 98th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #71 of 188 · Provisional
HESI
62.6
Event performance
63rd event percentile
PI
61.6
Prospect index
63rd event percentile
ORtg
93.4
Points / 100 poss.
52nd event percentile
DRtg
93.3
Lower is better
74th event percentile
NRtg
+0.1
Two-way margin
61st event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 93.4 · 52nd event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 93.3 · Stop% 67.9% · Team DRtg 98.4
Sample context
4 games · 151 minutes · 72% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
Scoring load
Questions for film
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
62.6
63rd event percentile
Prospect index
61.6
63rd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
93.4
52nd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
93.3
74th event percentile
Two-way margin
+0.1
61st event percentile
Stop percentage
67.9%
89th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
19.5 PPG
98th event percentile
Creation
2.0 APG
76th event percentile
Rebounding
16.5 RPG
99th event percentile
Defensive activity
4.3 stocks
78th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
45.4% TS
45th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Rebounder
16.5 RPG · 100th event percentile
Rim Protection
3.5 BPG · 99th event percentile
Scorer
19.5 PPG · 98th event percentile
Activity
16.5 RPG + 4.3 defensive plays/G · 85th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 63rd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 93.4 ORtg and 93.3 DRtg, producing a +0.1 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are rebounding, scoring load, and defensive stops.
Rebounding
16.5 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Scoring load
19.5 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Defensive stops
67.9% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
93.4
52nd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
19.5 PPG
98th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
45.4%
45th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
44.3%
53rd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
42.9%
63rd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
14.3%
context3.5 attempts per game
Free throws
44.4%
20th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
47.5%
66th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.0 APG
76th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
93.3
74th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
98.4
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+5.1
89th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
67.9%
89th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
4.3 STL+BLK
78th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
43.1
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+0.1
61st event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-2.2
63rd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
62.6
63rd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
61.6
63rd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
13.7%
86th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
16.5 RPG
99th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
4
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
151.2
context37.8 minutes per game.
Sample weight
71.6%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#71
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
336.4
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
4
GP
19.5
PPG
16.5
RPG
2.0
APG
#71
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
19.5
PPG
16.5
RPG
2.0
APG
3.5
TOV/G
0.5
3PM/G
45%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
19.5
P98
Playmaking
2.0
P76
Rebounding
16.5
P100
True shooting
45%
P45
Two-way impact
+0.1
P61
Stops
68%
P89
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
43%
30 made / 70 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
14%
2 made / 14 attempts
FT
Free throws
44%
16 made / 36 attempts
Shot selection
20% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
78
PTS
19.5 / game
30–70
FGM–FGA
2–14
3PM–3PA
16–36
FTM–FTA
creation
8
AST
2.0 / game
14
TOV
3.5 / game
0.57×
AST:TOV
24
FD
rebounding
66
REB
16.5 / game
23
OREB
43
DREB
16.5
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.8 / game
14
BLK
3.5 / game
10
PF
17
STL+BLK
4.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
62.6
HESI
61.6
PI
93.4
ORtg
93.3
DRtg
+0.1
NRtg
-2.2
Stable NRtg
68%
Stop%
47%
Floor%
44%
eFG%
14%
PIE
98.4
Team DRtg
+5.1
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
//current_rank
#71
of 188 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
19.5
PPG
16.5
RPG
2.0
APG
0.8
SPG
3.5
BPG
14%
3P%
45%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
4 GP · event rank #71
//quick_read
19.5
PPG
16.5
RPG
2.0
APG
3.5
TOV/G
0.5
3PM/G
45%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
19.5
P98
Playmaking
2.0
P76
Rebounding
16.5
P100
True shooting
45%
P45
Two-way impact
+0.1
P61
Stops
68%
P89
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
43%
30 made / 70 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
14%
2 made / 14 attempts
FT
Free throws
44%
16 made / 36 attempts
Shot selection
20% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
78
PTS
19.5 / game
30–70
FGM–FGA
2–14
3PM–3PA
16–36
FTM–FTA
creation
8
AST
2.0 / game
14
TOV
3.5 / game
0.57×
AST:TOV
24
FD
rebounding
66
REB
16.5 / game
23
OREB
43
DREB
16.5
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.8 / game
14
BLK
3.5 / game
10
PF
17
STL+BLK
4.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
62.6
HESI
61.6
PI
93.4
ORtg
93.3
DRtg
+0.1
NRtg
-2.2
Stable NRtg
68%
Stop%
47%
Floor%
44%
eFG%
14%
PIE
98.4
Team DRtg
+5.1
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.