Hesi Sports Consulting
back_to_rankings
Matin ESMAEILI portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026

Matin ESMAEILI

Forward · IRI · b. 2008

//measurables

198 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Defensive impact profile

Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

//event_signalDefensive Impact84.6 DRtg · 79% Stop% · 94th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection1.0 BPG · 88th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

2.3 stocksDefensive activity · 84th event percentile

3.7 RPGRebounding · 62nd event percentile

63.6
HESI v2.1
#69
of 188
56%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

Rank #69 of 188 · Provisional

HESI v2.1

HESI

63.6

Event performance

64th event percentile

PI

62.4

Prospect index

64th event percentile

ORtg

87.9

Points / 100 poss.

44th event percentile

DRtg

84.6

Lower is better

90th event percentile

NRtg

+3.3

Two-way margin

65th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 87.9 · 44th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 84.6 · Stop% 78.8% · Team DRtg 94.0

Sample context

6 games · 78 minutes · 56% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Defensive impact profileevent-relative description

Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Defensive activity

2.3 stocks84th event percentile

Rebounding

3.7 RPG62nd event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?

  2. 02

    Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?

  3. 03

    Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

63.6

64th event percentile

Prospect index

62.4

64th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

87.9

44th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

84.6

90th event percentile

Two-way margin

+3.3

65th event percentile

Stop percentage

78.8%

98th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

4.3 PPG

40th event percentile

Creation

0.3 APG

21st event percentile

Rebounding

3.7 RPG

62nd event percentile

Defensive activity

2.3 stocks

84th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

39.4% TS

31st event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P94

    Defensive Impact

    84.6 DRtg · 79% Stop% · 94th event percentile

  • P88

    Rim Protection

    1.0 BPG · 88th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 64th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 87.9 ORtg and 84.6 DRtg, producing a +3.3 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive stops, defensive efficiency, and defensive activity. The lowest relative areas are creation, scoring efficiency, and scoring load.

Relative strengths

  1. Defensive stops

    78.8% Stop%

    98th event percentile

    The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.

  2. Defensive efficiency

    84.6 DRtg

    90th event percentile

    The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.

  3. Defensive activity

    2.3 steals + blocks/G

    84th event percentile

    Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Creation

    0.3 APG

    21st event percentile

    Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.

  2. Scoring efficiency

    39.4% TS

    31st event percentile

    True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.

  3. Scoring load

    4.3 PPG

    40th event percentile

    Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

87.9

44th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

4.3 PPG

40th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

39.4%

31st event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

37.9%

36th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

34.5%

38th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

25.0%

context

1.3 attempts per game

Free throws

44.4%

20th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

42.0%

51st event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.3 APG

21st event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

84.6

90th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

94.0

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+9.4

97th event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

78.8%

98th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

2.3 STL+BLK

84th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

24.9

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+3.3

65th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-1.6

64th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

63.6

64th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

62.4

64th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

1.8%

53rd event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

3.7 RPG

62nd event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

6

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

77.9

context

13.0 minutes per game.

Sample weight

56.5%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Provisional

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#69

context

Among 188 published players.

Team possessions

569.0

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

6

GP

4.3

PPG

3.7

RPG

0.3

APG

#69

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

#69/188view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

4.3

PPG

3.7

RPG

0.3

APG

0.7

TOV/G

0.3

3PM/G

39%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

4.3

P40

Playmaking

0.3

P21

Rebounding

3.7

P62

True shooting

39%

P31

Two-way impact

+3.3

P65

Stops

79%

P98

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

35%

10 made / 29 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

25%

2 made / 8 attempts

FT

Free throws

44%

4 made / 9 attempts

Shot selection

28% of attempts from three

●2PA 21●3PA 8

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

26

PTS

4.3 / game

10–29

FGM–FGA

2–8

3PM–3PA

4–9

FTM–FTA

creation

2

AST

0.3 / game

4

TOV

0.7 / game

0.50×

AST:TOV

9

FD

rebounding

22

REB

3.7 / game

7

OREB

15

DREB

3.7

REB/G

defense

8

STL

1.3 / game

6

BLK

1.0 / game

10

PF

14

STL+BLK

2.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

63.6

HESI

62.4

PI

87.9

ORtg

84.6

DRtg

+3.3

NRtg

-1.6

Stable NRtg

79%

Stop%

42%

Floor%

38%

eFG%

2%

PIE

94.0

Team DRtg

+9.4

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games78 minutes13.0 min/game56% sample weightrank #69 of 188
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.

rank_above · #68Tameem Ashraf A M AbuissaF · QAT

//current_rank

#69

of 188 ranked

rank_below · #70Ameer Ibrahim Musa HausawiG · NGR, QAT
more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.

  • Yahya Basaran portrait#1

    Yahya Basaran

    Center · AUS

    15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG

    //event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Jongwon BAEK portrait#67

    Jongwon BAEK

    Forward · KOR

    3.6 PPG 1.6 RPG 0.6 APG

  • Tameem Ashraf A M Abuissa portrait#68

    Tameem Ashraf A M Abuissa

    Forward · QAT

    6.8 PPG 7.5 RPG 1.3 APG

    //event_signalActivity7.5 RPG + 2.8 defensive plays/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Ameer Ibrahim Musa Hausawi portrait#70

    Ameer Ibrahim Musa Hausawi

    Guard · NGR, QAT

    8.5 PPG 4.8 RPG 0.5 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

6

GP

4.3

PPG

3.7

RPG

0.3

APG

1.3

SPG

1.0

BPG

25%

3P%

39%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

6 GP · event rank #69

//quick_read

The line at a glance

4.3

PPG

3.7

RPG

0.3

APG

0.7

TOV/G

0.3

3PM/G

39%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

4.3

P40

Playmaking

0.3

P21

Rebounding

3.7

P62

True shooting

39%

P31

Two-way impact

+3.3

P65

Stops

79%

P98

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

35%

10 made / 29 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

25%

2 made / 8 attempts

FT

Free throws

44%

4 made / 9 attempts

Shot selection

28% of attempts from three

●2PA 21●3PA 8

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

26

PTS

4.3 / game

10–29

FGM–FGA

2–8

3PM–3PA

4–9

FTM–FTA

creation

2

AST

0.3 / game

4

TOV

0.7 / game

0.50×

AST:TOV

9

FD

rebounding

22

REB

3.7 / game

7

OREB

15

DREB

3.7

REB/G

defense

8

STL

1.3 / game

6

BLK

1.0 / game

10

PF

14

STL+BLK

2.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

63.6

HESI

62.4

PI

87.9

ORtg

84.6

DRtg

+3.3

NRtg

-1.6

Stable NRtg

79%

Stop%

42%

Floor%

38%

eFG%

2%

PIE

94.0

Team DRtg

+9.4

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games78 minutes13.0 min/game56% sample weightrank #69 of 188

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

CLAIM_THIS_PROFILE

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.