ORtg
105.2
69th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Combo Guard · NGR, QAT · b. 2009
//measurables
187 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileDefensive activity and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
2.8 stocksDefensive activity · 89th event percentile
59.1% TSScoring efficiency · 82nd event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #70 of 188 · Provisional
HESI
63.1
Event performance
63rd event percentile
PI
62.0
Prospect index
63rd event percentile
ORtg
105.2
Points / 100 poss.
69th event percentile
DRtg
103.7
Lower is better
43rd event percentile
NRtg
+1.5
Two-way margin
61st event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 105.2 · 69th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 103.7 · Stop% 55.8% · Team DRtg 105.6
Sample context
4 games · 96 minutes · 61% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Defensive activity and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Defensive activity
Scoring efficiency
Questions for film
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
63.1
63rd event percentile
Prospect index
62.0
63rd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
105.2
69th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
103.7
43rd event percentile
Two-way margin
+1.5
61st event percentile
Stop percentage
55.8%
66th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
8.5 PPG
69th event percentile
Creation
0.5 APG
29th event percentile
Rebounding
4.8 RPG
74th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.8 stocks
89th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
59.1% TS
82nd event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Disruptor
2.8 steals + blocks per game · 89th event percentile
Rim Protection
1.0 BPG · 88th event percentile
Activity
4.8 RPG + 2.8 defensive plays/G · 84th event percentile
Event Efficiency
59% TS on 8.5 PPG · 82nd event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 63rd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 105.2 ORtg and 103.7 DRtg, producing a +1.5 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive activity, scoring efficiency, and rebounding. The lowest relative area is creation.
Defensive activity
2.8 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
Scoring efficiency
59.1% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Rebounding
4.8 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Creation
0.5 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
105.2
69th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
8.5 PPG
69th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
59.1%
82nd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
59.3%
84th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
59.3%
92nd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
0.0%
context0.3 attempts per game
Free throws
50.0%
29th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
52.5%
78th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.5 APG
29th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
103.7
43rd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
105.6
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+1.9
74th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
55.8%
66th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.8 STL+BLK
89th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
21.2
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+1.5
61st event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-2.2
63rd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
63.1
63rd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
62.0
63rd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
5.7%
63rd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
4.8 RPG
74th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
4
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
95.8
context23.9 minutes per game.
Sample weight
61.5%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#70
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
317.1
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
4
GP
8.5
PPG
4.8
RPG
0.5
APG
#70
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
8.5
PPG
4.8
RPG
0.5
APG
1.5
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
59%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
8.5
P69
Playmaking
0.5
P29
Rebounding
4.8
P74
True shooting
59%
P82
Two-way impact
+1.5
P61
Stops
56%
P66
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
59%
16 made / 27 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 1 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
2 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
4% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
34
PTS
8.5 / game
16–27
FGM–FGA
0–1
3PM–3PA
2–4
FTM–FTA
creation
2
AST
0.5 / game
6
TOV
1.5 / game
0.33×
AST:TOV
2
FD
rebounding
19
REB
4.8 / game
9
OREB
10
DREB
4.8
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.8 / game
4
BLK
1.0 / game
9
PF
11
STL+BLK
2.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
63.1
HESI
62.0
PI
105.2
ORtg
103.7
DRtg
+1.5
NRtg
-2.2
Stable NRtg
56%
Stop%
53%
Floor%
59%
eFG%
6%
PIE
105.6
Team DRtg
+1.9
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
//current_rank
#70
of 188 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
8.5
PPG
4.8
RPG
0.5
APG
1.8
SPG
1.0
BPG
0%
3P%
59%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
4 GP · event rank #70
//quick_read
8.5
PPG
4.8
RPG
0.5
APG
1.5
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
59%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
8.5
P69
Playmaking
0.5
P29
Rebounding
4.8
P74
True shooting
59%
P82
Two-way impact
+1.5
P61
Stops
56%
P66
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
59%
16 made / 27 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 1 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
2 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
4% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
34
PTS
8.5 / game
16–27
FGM–FGA
0–1
3PM–3PA
2–4
FTM–FTA
creation
2
AST
0.5 / game
6
TOV
1.5 / game
0.33×
AST:TOV
2
FD
rebounding
19
REB
4.8 / game
9
OREB
10
DREB
4.8
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.8 / game
4
BLK
1.0 / game
9
PF
11
STL+BLK
2.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
63.1
HESI
62.0
PI
105.2
ORtg
103.7
DRtg
+1.5
NRtg
-2.2
Stable NRtg
56%
Stop%
53%
Floor%
59%
eFG%
6%
PIE
105.6
Team DRtg
+1.9
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.