ORtg
121.9
86th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026
Hoani Ifopo-Togia
Forward · NZL · b. 2008
//measurables
195 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileTwo-way event impact
Scoring efficiency and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalEvent Efficiency64% TS on 8.6 PPG · 89th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalOffensive Impact121.9 ORtg · 86th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
63.9% TSScoring efficiency · 89th event percentile
2.6 APGCreation · 83rd event percentile
- 82.3
- HESI v2.1
- #34
- of 188
- 59%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #34 of 188 · Provisional
HESI
82.3
Event performance
82nd event percentile
PI
77.4
Prospect index
82nd event percentile
ORtg
121.9
Points / 100 poss.
86th event percentile
DRtg
90.2
Lower is better
80th event percentile
NRtg
+31.7
Two-way margin
86th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 121.9 · 86th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 90.2 · Stop% 48.1% · Team DRtg 84.8
Sample context
5 games · 85 minutes · 59% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Two-way event impactevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
63.9% TS89th event percentile
Creation
2.6 APG83rd event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
- 03
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
82.3
82nd event percentile
Prospect index
77.4
82nd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
121.9
86th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
90.2
80th event percentile
Two-way margin
+31.7
86th event percentile
Stop percentage
48.1%
43rd event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
8.6 PPG
70th event percentile
Creation
2.6 APG
83rd event percentile
Rebounding
3.0 RPG
55th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.4 stocks
30th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
63.9% TS
89th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P89
Event Efficiency
64% TS on 8.6 PPG · 89th event percentile
- P86
Offensive Impact
121.9 ORtg · 86th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 82nd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 121.9 ORtg and 90.2 DRtg, producing a +31.7 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring efficiency, offensive efficiency, and two-way margin. The lowest relative area is defensive activity.
Relative strengths
- 89th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
63.9% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
- 86th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
121.9 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
- 86th event percentile
Two-way margin
+31.7 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Relative weaknesses
- 30th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.4 steals + blocks/G
Recorded steals and blocks are a lower relative area; this does not measure positioning, containment, or communication.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
8.6 PPG
70th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
63.9%
89th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
67.7%
94th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
64.5%
95th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
40.0%
context1.0 attempts per game
Free throws
16.7%
6th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
58.2%
90th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.6 APG
83rd event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
90.2
80th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
84.8
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-5.4
25th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
48.1%
43rd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.4 STL+BLK
30th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
16.0
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+31.7
86th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+15.3
82nd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
82.3
82nd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
77.4
82nd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
5.8%
72nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
3.0 RPG
55th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
85.3
context17.1 minutes per game.
Sample weight
58.7%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#34
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
466.8
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
5
GP
8.6
PPG
3.0
RPG
2.6
APG
#34
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
#34/188view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
8.6
PPG
3.0
RPG
2.6
APG
1.2
TOV/G
0.4
3PM/G
64%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
8.6
P70
Playmaking
2.6
P83
Rebounding
3.0
P55
True shooting
64%
P89
Two-way impact
+31.7
P86
Stops
48%
P43
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
65%
20 made / 31 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
40%
2 made / 5 attempts
FT
Free throws
17%
1 made / 6 attempts
Shot selection
16% of attempts from three
●2PA 26●3PA 5
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
43
PTS
8.6 / game
20–31
FGM–FGA
2–5
3PM–3PA
1–6
FTM–FTA
creation
13
AST
2.6 / game
6
TOV
1.2 / game
2.17×
AST:TOV
7
FD
rebounding
15
REB
3.0 / game
6
OREB
9
DREB
3.0
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.4 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
7
PF
2
STL+BLK
0.4 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
82.3
HESI
77.4
PI
121.9
ORtg
90.2
DRtg
+31.7
NRtg
+15.3
Stable NRtg
48%
Stop%
58%
Floor%
68%
eFG%
6%
PIE
84.8
Team DRtg
-5.4
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
rank_above · #33Kingston Kailahi-AsoF · NZLrank_below · #35Alex McMillianPF · JPN
//current_rank
#34
of 188 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
#1
Center · AUS
15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG
//event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#32
Point Guard · PHI
13.4 PPG 3.7 RPG 1.1 APG
//event_signalDisruptor3.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Efficiency62% TS on 13.4 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#33
#35
Power Forward · JPN
8.1 PPG 7.9 RPG 1.9 APG
//event_signalDisruptor3.4 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalActivity7.9 RPG + 3.4 defensive plays/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
5
GP
8.6
PPG
3.0
RPG
2.6
APG
0.4
SPG
0.0
BPG
40%
3P%
64%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
5 GP · event rank #34
//quick_read
The line at a glance
8.6
PPG
3.0
RPG
2.6
APG
1.2
TOV/G
0.4
3PM/G
64%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
8.6
P70
Playmaking
2.6
P83
Rebounding
3.0
P55
True shooting
64%
P89
Two-way impact
+31.7
P86
Stops
48%
P43
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
65%
20 made / 31 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
40%
2 made / 5 attempts
FT
Free throws
17%
1 made / 6 attempts
Shot selection
16% of attempts from three
●2PA 26●3PA 5
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
43
PTS
8.6 / game
20–31
FGM–FGA
2–5
3PM–3PA
1–6
FTM–FTA
creation
13
AST
2.6 / game
6
TOV
1.2 / game
2.17×
AST:TOV
7
FD
rebounding
15
REB
3.0 / game
6
OREB
9
DREB
3.0
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.4 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
7
PF
2
STL+BLK
0.4 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
82.3
HESI
77.4
PI
121.9
ORtg
90.2
DRtg
+31.7
NRtg
+15.3
Stable NRtg
48%
Stop%
58%
Floor%
68%
eFG%
6%
PIE
84.8
Team DRtg
-5.4
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.