ORtg
85.6
42nd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
Cooper Te Ratana
Forward · NZL · b. 2008
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 Asia Cup
//measurables
196 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring efficiency-led profile
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
50.9% TSScoring efficiency · 64th event percentile
2.6 PPGScoring load · 26th event percentile
- 53.5
- HESI v2.1
- #88
- of 188
- 44%
- sample weight
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #88 of 188 · Limited sample
HESI
53.5
Event performance
53rd event percentile
PI
54.3
Prospect index
53rd event percentile
ORtg
85.6
Points / 100 poss.
42nd event percentile
DRtg
90.8
Lower is better
80th event percentile
NRtg
-5.2
Two-way margin
54th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 85.6 · 42nd event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 90.8 · Stop% 46.7% · Team DRtg 84.8
Sample context
5 games · 47 minutes · 44% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
50.9% TS64th event percentile
Scoring load
2.6 PPG26th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 03
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
53.5
53rd event percentile
Prospect index
54.3
53rd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
85.6
42nd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
90.8
80th event percentile
Two-way margin
-5.2
54th event percentile
Stop percentage
46.7%
39th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
2.6 PPG
26th event percentile
Creation
0.2 APG
15th event percentile
Rebounding
0.8 RPG
14th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.2 stocks
22nd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
50.9% TS
64th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 53rd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 85.6 ORtg and 90.8 DRtg, producing a -5.2 Net Rating. The clearest relative strength is defensive efficiency. The lowest relative areas are rebounding, creation, and defensive activity.
Relative strengths
- 80th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
90.8 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Relative weaknesses
- 14th event percentile
Rebounding
0.8 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
- 15th event percentile
Creation
0.2 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
- 22nd event percentile
Defensive activity
0.2 steals + blocks/G
Recorded steals and blocks are a lower relative area; this does not measure positioning, containment, or communication.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
2.6 PPG
26th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
50.9%
64th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
45.5%
58th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
36.4%
42nd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
28.6%
context1.4 attempts per game
Free throws
75.0%
66th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
36.6%
38th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.2 APG
15th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
90.8
80th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
84.8
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-6.0
22nd event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
46.7%
39th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.2 STL+BLK
22nd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
8.5
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-5.2
54th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-6.8
53rd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
53.5
53rd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
54.3
53rd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
-0.1%
14th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
0.8 RPG
14th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
47.0
context9.4 minutes per game.
Sample weight
43.9%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Limited sample
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#88
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
466.8
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
film_room
Tape & footage
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
Featured clip
ClipStarts muted. Turn sound on in the player.
Clip
vs Vs Japan · 2026-09-23 · scout: Ahmed Tareq
YouTube · approved scout evidence
Open source03
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Ahmed Tareq
Report date: 2026-09-23
verified_human_evaluation
Basketball verdict
Independent scout evaluation · role and translation first
// projected_role
combo_guard · expanded on-ball creator · expanded secondary creator / connector · expanded spacing / shooting option
combo_guard · expanded on-ball creator · expanded secondary creator / connector · expanded spacing / shooting option. Best current separators: Screen navigation, Gap help. Primary pressure points: Ball-screen creation, Advantage extension.
Now · Combo GuardNow · Lead GuardProjects · Combo Guard
Translatable strengths
- · Screen navigation
- · Gap help
Exploitable weaknesses
- · Ball-screen creation
- · Advantage extension
Offensive translation
Can take on more on-ball creator responsibility at the target level. Can take on more secondary creator / connector responsibility at the target level. Can take on more spacing / shooting option responsibility at the target level.
Defensive assignments
situational point-of-attack / screen navigator (grade 3.5; assignment confirmed; workload can expand). situational gap / nail helper (grade 4; assignment confirmed; workload can expand).
Best offensive fit
Offensive scheme fit remains unresolved.
Best defensive fit
Possible fit: Can take point-of-attack assignments in a coverage with clearly defined screen rules. Assignment-confirmed film is still required.
Limiting environments
A scheme that leaves her to absorb repeated screens without back-line support. A low-communication scheme with unclear help and recovery responsibilities.
Development priorities
Ball-screen creation · Advantage extension
evidence_and_projection
Why the verdict holds
evidence_strength
strong
Limited representative evidence attached
pathway_hypothesis
NCAA D2
NCAA Division II hypothesis · experimental uncalibrated
Experimental · not outcome-calibrated
hesi_reconciliation
Scout view × current production
Agreement and conflict stay visible; they are not averaged into one score.
Current event production
inconclusive53.5 performance rating · rank 88 · 5 games
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Estimated offensive efficiency
inconclusiveORtg 85.6 · descriptive event context, not a role projection
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Floor percentage context
inconclusive36.6% · possession outcome context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Stop percentage context
inconclusive46.7% · box-score estimate with team and role context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
next_evaluation_assignment
Limited representative evidence attached
04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
5
GP
2.6
PPG
0.8
RPG
0.2
APG
#88
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
#88/188Event board →
5
GP
2.6
PPG
0.8
RPG
0.2
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 · 188 ranked players
rank_above · #87Alexandre ChahoudPF · LBNrank_below · #89Charbel El HereraPG · LBN
//current_rank
#88
of 188 ranked
#1
Center · AUS
15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG
//event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.- #86
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
5
GP
2.6
PPG
0.8
RPG
0.2
APG
0.2
SPG
0.0
BPG
29%
3P%
51%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
5 GP · event rank #88
//quick_read
The line at a glance
2.6
PPG
0.8
RPG
0.2
APG
0.8
TOV/G
0.4
3PM/G
51%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
2.6
P26
Playmaking
0.2
P15
Rebounding
0.8
P14
True shooting
51%
P64
Two-way impact
-5.2
P54
Stops
47%
P39
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
36%
4 made / 11 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
29%
2 made / 7 attempts
FT
Free throws
75%
3 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
64% of attempts from three
●2PA 4●3PA 7
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
13
PTS
2.6 / game
4–11
FGM–FGA
2–7
3PM–3PA
3–4
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.2 / game
4
TOV
0.8 / game
0.25×
AST:TOV
2
FD
rebounding
4
REB
0.8 / game
0
OREB
4
DREB
0.8
REB/G
defense
1
STL
0.2 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
8
PF
1
STL+BLK
0.2 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
53.5
HESI
54.3
PI
85.6
ORtg
90.8
DRtg
-5.2
NRtg
-6.8
Stable NRtg
47%
Stop%
37%
Floor%
46%
eFG%
-0%
PIE
84.8
Team DRtg
-6.0
Def. lift
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.