back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026

Arman -

Forward

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Scoring load-led profile

Scoring load and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

//event_signalScorer12.5 PPG · 88th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalActivity4.5 RPG + 2.3 defensive plays/G · 79th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

12.5 PPGScoring load · 88th event percentile

2.3 stocksDefensive activity · 83rd event percentile

54.5
HESI v2.1
#86
of 188
62%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

Rank #86 of 188 · Provisional

HESI v2.1

HESI

54.5

Event performance

55th event percentile

PI

55.1

Prospect index

55th event percentile

ORtg

95.2

Points / 100 poss.

55th event percentile

DRtg

99.8

Lower is better

58th event percentile

NRtg

-4.6

Two-way margin

55th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 95.2 · 55th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 99.8 · Stop% 62.9% · Team DRtg 103.0

Sample context

4 games · 99 minutes · 62% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Scoring load-led profileevent-relative description

Scoring load and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring load

12.5 PPG88th event percentile

Defensive activity

2.3 stocks83rd event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?

  2. 02

    Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?

  3. 03

    Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

54.5

55th event percentile

Prospect index

55.1

55th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

95.2

55th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

99.8

58th event percentile

Two-way margin

-4.6

55th event percentile

Stop percentage

62.9%

83rd event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

12.5 PPG

88th event percentile

Creation

0.5 APG

29th event percentile

Rebounding

4.5 RPG

71st event percentile

Defensive activity

2.3 stocks

83rd event percentile

Scoring efficiency

48.6% TS

57th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P88

    Scorer

    12.5 PPG · 88th event percentile

  • P79

    Activity

    4.5 RPG + 2.3 defensive plays/G · 79th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 55th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 95.2 ORtg and 99.8 DRtg, producing a -4.6 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring load, defensive activity, and defensive stops. The lowest relative area is creation.

Relative strengths

  1. Scoring load

    12.5 PPG

    88th event percentile

    Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.

  2. Defensive activity

    2.3 steals + blocks/G

    83rd event percentile

    Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.

  3. Defensive stops

    62.9% Stop%

    83rd event percentile

    The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Creation

    0.5 APG

    29th event percentile

    Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

95.2

55th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

12.5 PPG

88th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

48.6%

57th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

44.7%

55th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

34.0%

37th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

34.5%

context

7.3 attempts per game

Free throws

80.0%

75th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

38.2%

44th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.5 APG

29th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

99.8

58th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

103.0

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+3.1

82nd event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

62.9%

83rd event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

2.3 STL+BLK

83rd event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

24.6

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-4.6

55th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-5.9

55th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

54.5

55th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

55.1

55th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

6.0%

63rd event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

4.5 RPG

71st event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

4

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

99.3

context

24.8 minutes per game.

Sample weight

62.3%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Provisional

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#86

context

Among 188 published players.

Team possessions

315.6

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

4

GP

12.5

PPG

4.5

RPG

0.5

APG

#86

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

#86/188view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

12.5

PPG

4.5

RPG

0.5

APG

1.8

TOV/G

2.5

3PM/G

49%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

12.5

P88

Playmaking

0.5

P29

Rebounding

4.5

P71

True shooting

49%

P57

Two-way impact

-4.6

P55

Stops

63%

P83

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

34%

16 made / 47 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

35%

10 made / 29 attempts

FT

Free throws

80%

8 made / 10 attempts

Shot selection

62% of attempts from three

2PA 183PA 29

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

50

PTS

12.5 / game

16–47

FGM–FGA

10–29

3PM–3PA

8–10

FTM–FTA

creation

2

AST

0.5 / game

7

TOV

1.8 / game

0.29×

AST:TOV

8

FD

rebounding

18

REB

4.5 / game

2

OREB

16

DREB

4.5

REB/G

defense

7

STL

1.8 / game

2

BLK

0.5 / game

5

PF

9

STL+BLK

2.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

54.5

HESI

55.1

PI

95.2

ORtg

99.8

DRtg

-4.6

NRtg

-5.9

Stable NRtg

63%

Stop%

38%

Floor%

45%

eFG%

6%

PIE

103.0

Team DRtg

+3.1

Def. lift

sample_context

4 games99 minutes24.8 min/game62% sample weightrank #86 of 188
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.

more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.

  • Yahya Basaran portrait#1

    Yahya Basaran

    Center · AUS

    15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG

    //event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • MARCUS JAYDEN CHEN portrait#84

    MARCUS JAYDEN CHEN

    Shooting Guard · TPE, USA

    6.0 PPG 4.6 RPG 1.4 APG

  • Antwan Antwan portrait#85

    Antwan Antwan

    Point Guard · SYR

    5.8 PPG 2.8 RPG 1.3 APG

    //event_signalShooter39% 3PT on 3.3 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Alexandre Chahoud portrait#87

    Alexandre Chahoud

    Power Forward · LBN

    3.3 PPG 1.7 RPG 1.0 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

4

GP

12.5

PPG

4.5

RPG

0.5

APG

1.8

SPG

0.5

BPG

35%

3P%

49%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

4 GP · event rank #86

//quick_read

The line at a glance

12.5

PPG

4.5

RPG

0.5

APG

1.8

TOV/G

2.5

3PM/G

49%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

12.5

P88

Playmaking

0.5

P29

Rebounding

4.5

P71

True shooting

49%

P57

Two-way impact

-4.6

P55

Stops

63%

P83

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

34%

16 made / 47 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

35%

10 made / 29 attempts

FT

Free throws

80%

8 made / 10 attempts

Shot selection

62% of attempts from three

2PA 183PA 29

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

50

PTS

12.5 / game

16–47

FGM–FGA

10–29

3PM–3PA

8–10

FTM–FTA

creation

2

AST

0.5 / game

7

TOV

1.8 / game

0.29×

AST:TOV

8

FD

rebounding

18

REB

4.5 / game

2

OREB

16

DREB

4.5

REB/G

defense

7

STL

1.8 / game

2

BLK

0.5 / game

5

PF

9

STL+BLK

2.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

54.5

HESI

55.1

PI

95.2

ORtg

99.8

DRtg

-4.6

NRtg

-5.9

Stable NRtg

63%

Stop%

38%

Floor%

45%

eFG%

6%

PIE

103.0

Team DRtg

+3.1

Def. lift

sample_context

4 games99 minutes24.8 min/game62% sample weightrank #86 of 188

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.