ORtg
95.2
55th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Forward
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring load and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
12.5 PPGScoring load · 88th event percentile
2.3 stocksDefensive activity · 83rd event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #86 of 188 · Provisional
HESI
54.5
Event performance
55th event percentile
PI
55.1
Prospect index
55th event percentile
ORtg
95.2
Points / 100 poss.
55th event percentile
DRtg
99.8
Lower is better
58th event percentile
NRtg
-4.6
Two-way margin
55th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 95.2 · 55th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 99.8 · Stop% 62.9% · Team DRtg 103.0
Sample context
4 games · 99 minutes · 62% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring load and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring load
Defensive activity
Questions for film
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
54.5
55th event percentile
Prospect index
55.1
55th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
95.2
55th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
99.8
58th event percentile
Two-way margin
-4.6
55th event percentile
Stop percentage
62.9%
83rd event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
12.5 PPG
88th event percentile
Creation
0.5 APG
29th event percentile
Rebounding
4.5 RPG
71st event percentile
Defensive activity
2.3 stocks
83rd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
48.6% TS
57th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Scorer
12.5 PPG · 88th event percentile
Activity
4.5 RPG + 2.3 defensive plays/G · 79th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 55th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 95.2 ORtg and 99.8 DRtg, producing a -4.6 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring load, defensive activity, and defensive stops. The lowest relative area is creation.
Scoring load
12.5 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Defensive activity
2.3 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
Defensive stops
62.9% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Creation
0.5 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
95.2
55th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
12.5 PPG
88th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
48.6%
57th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
44.7%
55th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
34.0%
37th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
34.5%
context7.3 attempts per game
Free throws
80.0%
75th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
38.2%
44th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.5 APG
29th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
99.8
58th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
103.0
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+3.1
82nd event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
62.9%
83rd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.3 STL+BLK
83rd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
24.6
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-4.6
55th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-5.9
55th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
54.5
55th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
55.1
55th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
6.0%
63rd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
4.5 RPG
71st event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
4
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
99.3
context24.8 minutes per game.
Sample weight
62.3%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#86
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
315.6
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
4
GP
12.5
PPG
4.5
RPG
0.5
APG
#86
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
12.5
PPG
4.5
RPG
0.5
APG
1.8
TOV/G
2.5
3PM/G
49%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
12.5
P88
Playmaking
0.5
P29
Rebounding
4.5
P71
True shooting
49%
P57
Two-way impact
-4.6
P55
Stops
63%
P83
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
34%
16 made / 47 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
35%
10 made / 29 attempts
FT
Free throws
80%
8 made / 10 attempts
Shot selection
62% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
50
PTS
12.5 / game
16–47
FGM–FGA
10–29
3PM–3PA
8–10
FTM–FTA
creation
2
AST
0.5 / game
7
TOV
1.8 / game
0.29×
AST:TOV
8
FD
rebounding
18
REB
4.5 / game
2
OREB
16
DREB
4.5
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.8 / game
2
BLK
0.5 / game
5
PF
9
STL+BLK
2.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
54.5
HESI
55.1
PI
95.2
ORtg
99.8
DRtg
-4.6
NRtg
-5.9
Stable NRtg
63%
Stop%
38%
Floor%
45%
eFG%
6%
PIE
103.0
Team DRtg
+3.1
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
//current_rank
#86
of 188 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
12.5
PPG
4.5
RPG
0.5
APG
1.8
SPG
0.5
BPG
35%
3P%
49%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
4 GP · event rank #86
//quick_read
12.5
PPG
4.5
RPG
0.5
APG
1.8
TOV/G
2.5
3PM/G
49%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
12.5
P88
Playmaking
0.5
P29
Rebounding
4.5
P71
True shooting
49%
P57
Two-way impact
-4.6
P55
Stops
63%
P83
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
34%
16 made / 47 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
35%
10 made / 29 attempts
FT
Free throws
80%
8 made / 10 attempts
Shot selection
62% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
50
PTS
12.5 / game
16–47
FGM–FGA
10–29
3PM–3PA
8–10
FTM–FTA
creation
2
AST
0.5 / game
7
TOV
1.8 / game
0.29×
AST:TOV
8
FD
rebounding
18
REB
4.5 / game
2
OREB
16
DREB
4.5
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.8 / game
2
BLK
0.5 / game
5
PF
9
STL+BLK
2.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
54.5
HESI
55.1
PI
95.2
ORtg
99.8
DRtg
-4.6
NRtg
-5.9
Stable NRtg
63%
Stop%
38%
Floor%
45%
eFG%
6%
PIE
103.0
Team DRtg
+3.1
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.