ORtg
90.2
47th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026
Antwan Antwan
Point Guard · SYR · b. 2010
//measurables
192 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileCreation-led profile
Creation and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalShooter39% 3PT on 3.3 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
1.3 APGCreation · 53rd event percentile
2.8 RPGRebounding · 52nd event percentile
- 55.1
- HESI v2.1
- #85
- of 188
- 49%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #85 of 188 · Limited sample
HESI
55.1
Event performance
55th event percentile
PI
55.6
Prospect index
55th event percentile
ORtg
90.2
Points / 100 poss.
47th event percentile
DRtg
93.5
Lower is better
73rd event percentile
NRtg
-3.4
Two-way margin
56th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 90.2 · 47th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 93.5 · Stop% 57.6% · Team DRtg 94.2
Sample context
4 games · 57 minutes · 49% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation-led profileevent-relative description
Creation and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
1.3 APG53rd event percentile
Rebounding
2.8 RPG52nd event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
- 03
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
55.1
55th event percentile
Prospect index
55.6
55th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
90.2
47th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
93.5
73rd event percentile
Two-way margin
-3.4
56th event percentile
Stop percentage
57.6%
70th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
5.8 PPG
48th event percentile
Creation
1.3 APG
53rd event percentile
Rebounding
2.8 RPG
52nd event percentile
Defensive activity
0.5 stocks
32nd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
45.6% TS
46th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Shooter
39% 3PT on 3.3 3PA/G
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 55th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 90.2 ORtg and 93.5 DRtg, producing a -3.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency and defensive stops. The lowest relative area is defensive activity.
Relative strengths
- 73rd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
93.5 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
- 70th event percentile
Defensive stops
57.6% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Relative weaknesses
- 32nd event percentile
Defensive activity
0.5 steals + blocks/G
Recorded steals and blocks are a lower relative area; this does not measure positioning, containment, or communication.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
5.8 PPG
48th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
45.6%
46th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
50.0%
69th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
39.1%
50th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
38.5%
context3.3 attempts per game
Free throws
0.0%
3rd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
35.9%
36th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.3 APG
53rd event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
93.5
73rd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
94.2
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+0.6
66th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
57.6%
70th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.5 STL+BLK
32nd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
12.7
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-3.4
56th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-5.7
55th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
55.1
55th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
55.6
55th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
2.6%
39th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
2.8 RPG
52nd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
4
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
56.5
context14.1 minutes per game.
Sample weight
48.5%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Limited sample
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#85
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
313.3
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
4
GP
5.8
PPG
2.8
RPG
1.3
APG
#85
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
#85/188view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
5.8
PPG
2.8
RPG
1.3
APG
1.0
TOV/G
1.3
3PM/G
46%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
5.8
P48
Playmaking
1.3
P53
Rebounding
2.8
P52
True shooting
46%
P46
Two-way impact
-3.4
P56
Stops
58%
P70
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
39%
9 made / 23 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
39%
5 made / 13 attempts
FT
Free throws
0%
0 made / 5 attempts
Shot selection
57% of attempts from three
●2PA 10●3PA 13
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
23
PTS
5.8 / game
9–23
FGM–FGA
5–13
3PM–3PA
0–5
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
1.3 / game
4
TOV
1.0 / game
1.25×
AST:TOV
2
FD
rebounding
11
REB
2.8 / game
1
OREB
10
DREB
2.8
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.5 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
8
PF
2
STL+BLK
0.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
55.1
HESI
55.6
PI
90.2
ORtg
93.5
DRtg
-3.4
NRtg
-5.7
Stable NRtg
58%
Stop%
36%
Floor%
50%
eFG%
3%
PIE
94.2
Team DRtg
+0.6
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
rank_above · #84MARCUS JAYDEN CHENSG · TPE, USArank_below · #86Arman -F
//current_rank
#85
of 188 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
#1
Center · AUS
15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG
//event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#83
#84
- #86
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
5.8
PPG
2.8
RPG
1.3
APG
0.5
SPG
0.0
BPG
39%
3P%
46%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
4 GP · event rank #85
//quick_read
The line at a glance
5.8
PPG
2.8
RPG
1.3
APG
1.0
TOV/G
1.3
3PM/G
46%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
5.8
P48
Playmaking
1.3
P53
Rebounding
2.8
P52
True shooting
46%
P46
Two-way impact
-3.4
P56
Stops
58%
P70
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
39%
9 made / 23 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
39%
5 made / 13 attempts
FT
Free throws
0%
0 made / 5 attempts
Shot selection
57% of attempts from three
●2PA 10●3PA 13
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
23
PTS
5.8 / game
9–23
FGM–FGA
5–13
3PM–3PA
0–5
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
1.3 / game
4
TOV
1.0 / game
1.25×
AST:TOV
2
FD
rebounding
11
REB
2.8 / game
1
OREB
10
DREB
2.8
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.5 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
8
PF
2
STL+BLK
0.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
55.1
HESI
55.6
PI
90.2
ORtg
93.5
DRtg
-3.4
NRtg
-5.7
Stable NRtg
58%
Stop%
36%
Floor%
50%
eFG%
3%
PIE
94.2
Team DRtg
+0.6
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.