ORtg
92.7
66th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Zala Mali
SLO · b. 2009
//measurables
187 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileDefensive activity-led profile
Defensive activity and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
1.3 stocksDefensive activity · 61st event percentile
1.0 APGCreation · 45th event percentile
- 52.9
- HESI v2.1
- #91
- of 192
- 63%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #91 of 192 · Established
HESI
52.9
Event performance
53rd event percentile
PI
56.8
Prospect index
53rd event percentile
ORtg
92.7
Points / 100 poss.
66th event percentile
DRtg
90.0
Lower is better
23rd event percentile
NRtg
+2.7
Two-way margin
53rd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 92.7 · 66th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 90.0 · Stop% 55.2% · Team DRtg 88.0
Sample context
7 games · 100 minutes · 63% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Defensive activity-led profileevent-relative description
Defensive activity and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Defensive activity
1.3 stocks61st event percentile
Creation
1.0 APG45th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 03
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
52.9
53rd event percentile
Prospect index
56.8
53rd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
92.7
66th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
90.0
23rd event percentile
Two-way margin
+2.7
53rd event percentile
Stop percentage
55.2%
46th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
2.9 PPG
33rd event percentile
Creation
1.0 APG
45th event percentile
Rebounding
2.0 RPG
28th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.3 stocks
61st event percentile
Scoring efficiency
36.5% TS
35th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 53rd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 92.7 ORtg and 90.0 DRtg, producing a +2.7 Net Rating. The clearest relative strength is offensive efficiency. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, rebounding, and scoring load.
Relative strengths
- 66th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
92.7 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
Relative weaknesses
- 23rd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
90.0 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
- 28th event percentile
Rebounding
2.0 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
- 33rd event percentile
Scoring load
2.9 PPG
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
2.9 PPG
33rd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
36.5%
35th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
34.8%
40th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
26.1%
28th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
36.4%
context1.6 attempts per game
Free throws
40.0%
21st event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
41.0%
60th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.0 APG
45th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
90.0
23rd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
88.0
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-2.0
54th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
55.2%
46th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.3 STL+BLK
61st event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
20.2
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+2.7
53rd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+1.8
53rd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
52.9
53rd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
56.8
53rd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
1.7%
35th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
2.0 RPG
28th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
100.0
context14.3 minutes per game.
Sample weight
62.5%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#91
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
512.3
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
2.9
PPG
2.0
RPG
1.0
APG
#91
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#91/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
2.9
PPG
2.0
RPG
1.0
APG
0.4
TOV/G
0.6
3PM/G
37%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
2.9
P33
Playmaking
1.0
P45
Rebounding
2.0
P28
True shooting
37%
P35
Two-way impact
+2.7
P53
Stops
55%
P46
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
26%
6 made / 23 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
36%
4 made / 11 attempts
FT
Free throws
40%
4 made / 10 attempts
Shot selection
48% of attempts from three
●2PA 12●3PA 11
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
20
PTS
2.9 / game
6–23
FGM–FGA
4–11
3PM–3PA
4–10
FTM–FTA
creation
7
AST
1.0 / game
3
TOV
0.4 / game
2.33×
AST:TOV
9
FD
rebounding
14
REB
2.0 / game
8
OREB
6
DREB
2.0
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.0 / game
2
BLK
0.3 / game
9
PF
9
STL+BLK
1.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
52.9
HESI
56.8
PI
92.7
ORtg
90.0
DRtg
+2.7
NRtg
+1.8
Stable NRtg
55%
Stop%
41%
Floor%
35%
eFG%
2%
PIE
88.0
Team DRtg
-2.0
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
rank_above · #90Leni Schramm-BunningGERrank_below · #92Hana JerkovicSLO
//current_rank
#91
of 192 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#1
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#89
#90
#92
SLO
10.3 PPG 1.8 RPG 3.8 APG
//event_signalShooter44% 3PT on 4.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
2.9
PPG
2.0
RPG
1.0
APG
1.0
SPG
0.3
BPG
36%
3P%
37%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #91
//quick_read
The line at a glance
2.9
PPG
2.0
RPG
1.0
APG
0.4
TOV/G
0.6
3PM/G
37%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
2.9
P33
Playmaking
1.0
P45
Rebounding
2.0
P28
True shooting
37%
P35
Two-way impact
+2.7
P53
Stops
55%
P46
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
26%
6 made / 23 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
36%
4 made / 11 attempts
FT
Free throws
40%
4 made / 10 attempts
Shot selection
48% of attempts from three
●2PA 12●3PA 11
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
20
PTS
2.9 / game
6–23
FGM–FGA
4–11
3PM–3PA
4–10
FTM–FTA
creation
7
AST
1.0 / game
3
TOV
0.4 / game
2.33×
AST:TOV
9
FD
rebounding
14
REB
2.0 / game
8
OREB
6
DREB
2.0
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.0 / game
2
BLK
0.3 / game
9
PF
9
STL+BLK
1.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
52.9
HESI
56.8
PI
92.7
ORtg
90.0
DRtg
+2.7
NRtg
+1.8
Stable NRtg
55%
Stop%
41%
Floor%
35%
eFG%
2%
PIE
88.0
Team DRtg
-2.0
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.