back_to_rankings
Habiba Soliman portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Habiba Soliman

EGY · b. 2010

//measurables

170 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Defensive activity-led profile

Defensive activity and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

0.3 stocksDefensive activity · 20th event percentile

22.0% TSScoring efficiency · 11th event percentile

10.5
HESI v2.1
#170
of 192
52%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

Rank #170 of 192 · Provisional

HESI v2.1

HESI

10.5

Event performance

11th event percentile

PI

24.1

Prospect index

12th event percentile

ORtg

43.8

Points / 100 poss.

10th event percentile

DRtg

89.4

Lower is better

24th event percentile

NRtg

-45.6

Two-way margin

10th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 43.8 · 10th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 89.4 · Stop% 43.6% · Team DRtg 81.3

Sample context

7 games · 65 minutes · 52% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Defensive activity-led profileevent-relative description

Defensive activity and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Defensive activity

0.3 stocks20th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

22.0% TS11th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?

  2. 02

    Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?

  3. 03

    Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

10.5

11th event percentile

Prospect index

24.1

12th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

43.8

10th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

89.4

24th event percentile

Two-way margin

-45.6

10th event percentile

Stop percentage

43.6%

7th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

1.0 PPG

9th event percentile

Creation

0.3 APG

9th event percentile

Rebounding

0.6 RPG

2nd event percentile

Defensive activity

0.3 stocks

20th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

22.0% TS

11th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 11th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 43.8 ORtg and 89.4 DRtg, producing a -45.6 Net Rating. The lowest relative areas are rebounding, defensive stops, and scoring load.

Relative strengths

No available metric currently clears the 65th event percentile.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Rebounding

    0.6 RPG

    2nd event percentile

    Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.

  2. Defensive stops

    43.6% Stop%

    7th event percentile

    The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.

  3. Scoring load

    1.0 PPG

    9th event percentile

    Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

43.8

10th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

1.0 PPG

9th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

22.0%

11th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

23.3%

16th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

20.0%

15th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

14.3%

context

1.0 attempts per game

Free throws

0.0%

3rd event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

19.0%

8th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.3 APG

9th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

89.4

24th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

81.3

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-8.1

5th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

43.6%

7th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.3 STL+BLK

20th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

11.1

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-45.6

10th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-23.6

11th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

10.5

11th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

24.1

12th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

-1.5%

11th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

0.6 RPG

2nd event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

7

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

64.6

context

9.2 minutes per game.

Sample weight

51.8%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Provisional

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#170

context

Among 192 published players.

Team possessions

550.9

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

7

GP

1.0

PPG

0.6

RPG

0.3

APG

#170

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#170/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

1.0

PPG

0.6

RPG

0.3

APG

0.6

TOV/G

0.1

3PM/G

22%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

1.0

P9

Playmaking

0.3

P9

Rebounding

0.6

P2

True shooting

22%

P11

Two-way impact

-45.6

P10

Stops

44%

P7

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

20%

3 made / 15 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

14%

1 made / 7 attempts

FT

Free throws

0%

0 made / 2 attempts

Shot selection

47% of attempts from three

2PA 83PA 7

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

7

PTS

1.0 / game

3–15

FGM–FGA

1–7

3PM–3PA

0–2

FTM–FTA

creation

2

AST

0.3 / game

4

TOV

0.6 / game

0.50×

AST:TOV

2

FD

rebounding

4

REB

0.6 / game

1

OREB

3

DREB

0.6

REB/G

defense

2

STL

0.3 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

5

PF

2

STL+BLK

0.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

10.5

HESI

24.1

PI

43.8

ORtg

89.4

DRtg

-45.6

NRtg

-23.6

Stable NRtg

44%

Stop%

19%

Floor%

23%

eFG%

-2%

PIE

81.3

Team DRtg

-8.1

Def. lift

sample_context

7 games65 minutes9.2 min/game52% sample weightrank #170 of 192
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.

  • Micah Ojo portrait#1

    Micah Ojo

    United States

    11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG

    //event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Alisson Restrepo portrait#168

    Alisson Restrepo

    COL

    5.0 PPG 3.6 RPG 1.2 APG

  • Julija Bukovec portrait#169

    Julija Bukovec

    SLO

    0.0 PPG 0.7 RPG 0.3 APG

  • Jane Mary Diomande portrait#171

    Jane Mary Diomande

    Côte d'Ivoire

    10.3 PPG 5.0 RPG 0.7 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

7

GP

1.0

PPG

0.6

RPG

0.3

APG

0.3

SPG

0.0

BPG

14%

3P%

22%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

7 GP · event rank #170

//quick_read

The line at a glance

1.0

PPG

0.6

RPG

0.3

APG

0.6

TOV/G

0.1

3PM/G

22%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

1.0

P9

Playmaking

0.3

P9

Rebounding

0.6

P2

True shooting

22%

P11

Two-way impact

-45.6

P10

Stops

44%

P7

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

20%

3 made / 15 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

14%

1 made / 7 attempts

FT

Free throws

0%

0 made / 2 attempts

Shot selection

47% of attempts from three

2PA 83PA 7

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

7

PTS

1.0 / game

3–15

FGM–FGA

1–7

3PM–3PA

0–2

FTM–FTA

creation

2

AST

0.3 / game

4

TOV

0.6 / game

0.50×

AST:TOV

2

FD

rebounding

4

REB

0.6 / game

1

OREB

3

DREB

0.6

REB/G

defense

2

STL

0.3 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

5

PF

2

STL+BLK

0.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

10.5

HESI

24.1

PI

43.8

ORtg

89.4

DRtg

-45.6

NRtg

-23.6

Stable NRtg

44%

Stop%

19%

Floor%

23%

eFG%

-2%

PIE

81.3

Team DRtg

-8.1

Def. lift

sample_context

7 games65 minutes9.2 min/game52% sample weightrank #170 of 192

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.