Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Ava Jones

NZL · b. 2009

//measurables

188 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Scoring efficiency-led profile

Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

51.6% TSScoring efficiency · 85th event percentile

7.0 PPGScoring load · 68th event percentile

79.1
HESI v2.1: #41
of 192: 69%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

Rank #41 of 192 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

79.1

Event performance

79th event percentile

77.8

Prospect index

79th event percentile

ORtg

101.0

Points / 100 poss.

79th event percentile

DRtg

83.6

Lower is better

49th event percentile

NRtg

+17.4

Two-way margin

78th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 101.0 · 79th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 83.6 · Stop% 56.9% · Team DRtg 80.5

Sample context

7 games · 136 minutes · 69% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description

Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring efficiency

51.6% TS85th event percentile

Scoring load

7.0 PPG68th event percentile

Questions for film

01
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

79.1

79th event percentile

Prospect index

77.8

79th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

101.0

79th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

83.6

49th event percentile

Two-way margin

+17.4

78th event percentile

Stop percentage

56.9%

51st event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

7.0 PPG

68th event percentile

Creation

1.1 APG

49th event percentile

Rebounding

3.6 RPG

62nd event percentile

Defensive activity

1.0 stocks

42nd event percentile

Scoring efficiency

51.6% TS

85th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

Shooter
41% 3PT on 4.1 3PA/G

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 79th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 101.0 ORtg and 83.6 DRtg, producing a +17.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring efficiency, offensive efficiency, and two-way margin.

Relative strengths

Scoring efficiency
51.6% TS
85th event percentile
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Offensive efficiency
101.0 ORtg
79th event percentile
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
Two-way margin
+17.4 NRtg
78th event percentile
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.

Relative weaknesses

No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

101.0

79th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

7.0 PPG

68th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

51.6%

85th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

52.3%

92nd event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

38.6%

67th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

41.4%

context

4.1 attempts per game

Free throws

37.5%

19th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

40.6%

58th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.1 APG

49th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

83.6

49th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

80.5

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-3.2

39th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

56.9%

51st event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.0 STL+BLK

42nd event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

30.4

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+17.4

78th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+12.1

79th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

79.1

79th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

77.8

79th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

5.4%

77th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

3.6 RPG

62nd event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

135.9

context

19.4 minutes per game.

Sample weight

69.4%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#41

context

Among 192 published players.

Team possessions

550.5

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

7.0

PPG

3.6

RPG

1.1

APG

#41

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#41/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

7.0

PPG

3.6

RPG

1.1

APG

1.1

TOV/G

1.7

3PM/G

52%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

7.0

P68

Playmaking

1.1

P49

Rebounding

3.6

P62

True shooting

52%

P85

Two-way impact

+17.4

P78

Stops

57%

P51

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

39%

17 made / 44 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

41%

12 made / 29 attempts

Free throws

38%

3 made / 8 attempts

Shot selection

66% of attempts from three

●2PA 15●3PA 29

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

7.0 / game

17–44

FGM–FGA

12–29

3PM–3PA

3–8

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

1.1 / game

TOV

1.1 / game

1.00×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

3.6 / game

OREB

DREB

3.6

REB/G

defense

STL

1.0 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

1.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

79.1

HESI

77.8

101.0

ORtg

83.6

DRtg

+17.4

NRtg

+12.1

Stable NRtg

57%

Stop%

41%

Floor%

52%

eFG%

PIE

80.5

Team DRtg

-3.2

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

rank_above · #40Ona BallesteSpain

//current_rank

#41

of 192 ranked

rank_below · #42Julie PrichystalovaCZE

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

7.0

PPG

3.6

RPG

1.1

APG

1.0

SPG

0.0

BPG

41%

3P%

52%

TS%

event_stats