ORtg
73.3
30th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
Cooper Adams
Combo Guard · NZL · b. 2008
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 Asia Cup
//measurables
191 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileDefensive impact profile
Scoring efficiency and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
59.5% TSScoring efficiency · 83rd event percentile
0.5 stocksDefensive activity · 32nd event percentile
- 50.3
- HESI v2.1
- #94
- of 188
- 16%
- sample weight
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #94 of 188 · Limited sample
HESI
50.3
Event performance
50th event percentile
PI
51.7
Prospect index
50th event percentile
ORtg
73.3
Points / 100 poss.
30th event percentile
DRtg
79.9
Lower is better
94th event percentile
NRtg
-6.6
Two-way margin
52nd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 73.3 · 30th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 79.9 · Stop% 72.1% · Team DRtg 84.8
Sample context
2 games · 11 minutes · 16% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Defensive impact profileevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
59.5% TS83rd event percentile
Defensive activity
0.5 stocks32nd event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 03
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
50.3
50th event percentile
Prospect index
51.7
50th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
73.3
30th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
79.9
94th event percentile
Two-way margin
-6.6
52nd event percentile
Stop percentage
72.1%
92nd event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
3.5 PPG
31st event percentile
Creation
0.0 APG
7th event percentile
Rebounding
1.5 RPG
27th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.5 stocks
32nd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
59.5% TS
83rd event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 50th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 73.3 ORtg and 79.9 DRtg, producing a -6.6 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency, defensive stops, and scoring efficiency. The lowest relative areas are creation, rebounding, and offensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 94th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
79.9 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
- 92nd event percentile
Defensive stops
72.1% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
- 83rd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
59.5% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Relative weaknesses
- 7th event percentile
Creation
0.0 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
- 27th event percentile
Rebounding
1.5 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
- 30th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
73.3 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
3.5 PPG
31st event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
59.5%
83rd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
50.0%
69th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
40.0%
53rd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
33.3%
context1.5 attempts per game
Free throws
100.0%
94th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
29.8%
23rd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.0 APG
7th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
79.9
94th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
84.8
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+5.0
88th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
72.1%
92nd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.5 STL+BLK
32nd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
3.2
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-6.6
52nd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-7.7
50th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
50.3
50th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
51.7
50th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
0.4%
31st event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
1.5 RPG
27th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
2
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
11.3
context5.7 minutes per game.
Sample weight
15.8%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Limited sample
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#94
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
466.8
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
film_room
Tape & footage
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
Featured clip
ClipStarts muted. Turn sound on in the player.
Clip
vs Vs Japan · 2026-09-23 · scout: Ahmed Tareq
YouTube · approved scout evidence
Open source03
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Ahmed Tareq
Report date: 2026-09-23
verified_human_evaluation
Basketball verdict
Independent scout evaluation · role and translation first
// projected_role
combo_guard · off_guard · expanded on-ball creator · expanded secondary creator / connector · expanded spacing / shooting option
combo_guard · off_guard · expanded on-ball creator · expanded secondary creator / connector · expanded spacing / shooting option. Best current separators: Finishing, Shooting utility, Gap help. Primary pressure points: Ball-screen creation, Point-of-attack defense, Screen navigation.
Now · Combo GuardNow · Lead GuardProjects · Combo GuardProjects · Off Guard
Translatable strengths
- · Finishing
- · Shooting utility
- · Gap help
Exploitable weaknesses
- · Ball-screen creation
- · Point-of-attack defense
- · Screen navigation
Offensive translation
Can take on more on-ball creator responsibility at the target level. Can take on more secondary creator / connector responsibility at the target level. Can take on more spacing / shooting option responsibility at the target level.
Defensive assignments
primary gap / nail helper (grade 4; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). situational point-of-attack / screen navigator (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload likely reduces at the target level).
Best offensive fit
Possible fit: Adds value in movement and spacing actions without dominating the ball. Representative film is still required.
Best defensive fit
Possible fit: Fits a connected help defense that values early positioning, tags and recoveries. Assignment-confirmed film is still required.
Limiting environments
A role with little movement, relocation or catch-ready shooting responsibility. A low-communication scheme with unclear help and recovery responsibilities.
Development priorities
Ball-screen creation · Point-of-attack defense
evidence_and_projection
Why the verdict holds
evidence_strength
developing
Only one viewing sample
pathway_hypothesis
Insufficient evidence
Insufficient evidence for a basketball pathway conclusion.
Evidence gates incomplete
hesi_reconciliation
Scout view × current production
Agreement and conflict stay visible; they are not averaged into one score.
Current event production
inconclusive50.3 performance rating · rank 94 · 2 games
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Estimated offensive efficiency
inconclusiveORtg 73.3 · descriptive event context, not a role projection
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Floor percentage context
inconclusive29.8% · possession outcome context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Stop percentage context
inconclusive72.1% · box-score estimate with team and role context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
next_evaluation_assignment
Evaluate at least two games
04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
2
GP
3.5
PPG
1.5
RPG
0.0
APG
#94
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
#94/188Event board →
2
GP
3.5
PPG
1.5
RPG
0.0
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 · 188 ranked players
rank_above · #93Taym AldassoukiSG · SYRrank_below · #95Seungjun LEEF · KOR
//current_rank
#94
of 188 ranked
#1
Center · AUS
15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG
//event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#92
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
2
GP
3.5
PPG
1.5
RPG
0.0
APG
0.5
SPG
0.0
BPG
33%
3P%
60%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
2 GP · event rank #94
//quick_read
The line at a glance
3.5
PPG
1.5
RPG
0.0
APG
2.0
TOV/G
0.5
3PM/G
60%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
3.5
P31
Playmaking
0.0
P7
Rebounding
1.5
P27
True shooting
60%
P83
Two-way impact
-6.6
P52
Stops
72%
P92
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
40%
2 made / 5 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
33%
1 made / 3 attempts
FT
Free throws
100%
2 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
60% of attempts from three
●2PA 2●3PA 3
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
7
PTS
3.5 / game
2–5
FGM–FGA
1–3
3PM–3PA
2–2
FTM–FTA
creation
0
AST
0.0 / game
4
TOV
2.0 / game
0.00×
AST:TOV
1
FD
rebounding
3
REB
1.5 / game
1
OREB
2
DREB
1.5
REB/G
defense
1
STL
0.5 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
1
PF
1
STL+BLK
0.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
50.3
HESI
51.7
PI
73.3
ORtg
79.9
DRtg
-6.6
NRtg
-7.7
Stable NRtg
72%
Stop%
30%
Floor%
50%
eFG%
0%
PIE
84.8
Team DRtg
+5.0
Def. lift
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.