ORtg
89.0
45th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026
Taym Aldassouki
Shooting Guard · SYR · b. 2009
//measurables
180 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring load-led profile
Scoring load and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalScorer12.8 PPG · 89th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
12.8 PPGScoring load · 89th event percentile
1.8 APGCreation · 71st event percentile
- 50.8
- HESI v2.1
- #93
- of 188
- 66%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #93 of 188 · Provisional
HESI
50.8
Event performance
51st event percentile
PI
52.1
Prospect index
51st event percentile
ORtg
89.0
Points / 100 poss.
45th event percentile
DRtg
96.4
Lower is better
68th event percentile
NRtg
-7.4
Two-way margin
50th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 89.0 · 45th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 96.4 · Stop% 51.0% · Team DRtg 94.2
Sample context
4 games · 118 minutes · 66% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring load-led profileevent-relative description
Scoring load and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring load
12.8 PPG89th event percentile
Creation
1.8 APG71st event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 03
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
50.8
51st event percentile
Prospect index
52.1
51st event percentile
Offensive efficiency
89.0
45th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
96.4
68th event percentile
Two-way margin
-7.4
50th event percentile
Stop percentage
51.0%
54th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
12.8 PPG
89th event percentile
Creation
1.8 APG
71st event percentile
Rebounding
2.3 RPG
41st event percentile
Defensive activity
1.8 stocks
56th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
48.3% TS
55th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P89
Scorer
12.8 PPG · 89th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 51st event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 89.0 ORtg and 96.4 DRtg, producing a -7.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring load, creation, and defensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 89th event percentile
Scoring load
12.8 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
- 71st event percentile
Creation
1.8 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
- 68th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
96.4 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Relative weaknesses
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
12.8 PPG
89th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
48.3%
55th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
42.7%
44th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
35.4%
40th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
30.4%
context5.8 attempts per game
Free throws
90.9%
86th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
37.5%
40th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.8 APG
71st event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
96.4
68th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
94.2
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-2.2
50th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
51.0%
54th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.8 STL+BLK
56th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
23.5
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-7.4
50th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-7.6
51st event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
50.8
51st event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
52.1
51st event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
4.9%
47th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
2.3 RPG
41st event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
4
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
117.9
context29.5 minutes per game.
Sample weight
66.3%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#93
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
313.3
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
4
GP
12.8
PPG
2.3
RPG
1.8
APG
#93
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
#93/188view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
12.8
PPG
2.3
RPG
1.8
APG
3.3
TOV/G
1.8
3PM/G
48%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
12.8
P89
Playmaking
1.8
P71
Rebounding
2.3
P41
True shooting
48%
P55
Two-way impact
-7.4
P50
Stops
51%
P54
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
35%
17 made / 48 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
30%
7 made / 23 attempts
FT
Free throws
91%
10 made / 11 attempts
Shot selection
48% of attempts from three
●2PA 25●3PA 23
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
51
PTS
12.8 / game
17–48
FGM–FGA
7–23
3PM–3PA
10–11
FTM–FTA
creation
7
AST
1.8 / game
13
TOV
3.3 / game
0.54×
AST:TOV
17
FD
rebounding
9
REB
2.3 / game
1
OREB
8
DREB
2.3
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.8 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
11
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
50.8
HESI
52.1
PI
89.0
ORtg
96.4
DRtg
-7.4
NRtg
-7.6
Stable NRtg
51%
Stop%
38%
Floor%
43%
eFG%
5%
PIE
94.2
Team DRtg
-2.2
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
rank_above · #92ABDULLAH KABANISF · SYRrank_below · #94Cooper AdamsG · NZL
//current_rank
#93
of 188 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
#1
Center · AUS
15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG
//event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#91
#92
#94
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
12.8
PPG
2.3
RPG
1.8
APG
1.8
SPG
0.0
BPG
30%
3P%
48%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
4 GP · event rank #93
//quick_read
The line at a glance
12.8
PPG
2.3
RPG
1.8
APG
3.3
TOV/G
1.8
3PM/G
48%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
12.8
P89
Playmaking
1.8
P71
Rebounding
2.3
P41
True shooting
48%
P55
Two-way impact
-7.4
P50
Stops
51%
P54
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
35%
17 made / 48 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
30%
7 made / 23 attempts
FT
Free throws
91%
10 made / 11 attempts
Shot selection
48% of attempts from three
●2PA 25●3PA 23
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
51
PTS
12.8 / game
17–48
FGM–FGA
7–23
3PM–3PA
10–11
FTM–FTA
creation
7
AST
1.8 / game
13
TOV
3.3 / game
0.54×
AST:TOV
17
FD
rebounding
9
REB
2.3 / game
1
OREB
8
DREB
2.3
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.8 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
11
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
50.8
HESI
52.1
PI
89.0
ORtg
96.4
DRtg
-7.4
NRtg
-7.6
Stable NRtg
51%
Stop%
38%
Floor%
43%
eFG%
5%
PIE
94.2
Team DRtg
-2.2
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.