ORtg
97.4
58th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026
Shu-Wei Lu
Forward · TPE · b. 2009
//measurables
187 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileDefensive activity-led profile
Defensive activity and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
1.0 stocksDefensive activity · 57th event percentile
47.1% TSScoring efficiency · 52nd event percentile
- 51.9
- HESI v2.1
- #91
- of 188
- 32%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #91 of 188 · Limited sample
HESI
51.9
Event performance
52nd event percentile
PI
53.0
Prospect index
52nd event percentile
ORtg
97.4
Points / 100 poss.
58th event percentile
DRtg
103.0
Lower is better
44th event percentile
NRtg
-5.6
Two-way margin
53rd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 97.4 · 58th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 103.0 · Stop% 55.7% · Team DRtg 105.2
Sample context
4 games · 29 minutes · 32% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Defensive activity-led profileevent-relative description
Defensive activity and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Defensive activity
1.0 stocks57th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
47.1% TS52nd event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 03
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
51.9
52nd event percentile
Prospect index
53.0
52nd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
97.4
58th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
103.0
44th event percentile
Two-way margin
-5.6
53rd event percentile
Stop percentage
55.7%
66th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
4.0 PPG
37th event percentile
Creation
0.5 APG
29th event percentile
Rebounding
0.5 RPG
8th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.0 stocks
57th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
47.1% TS
52nd event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 52nd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 97.4 ORtg and 103.0 DRtg, producing a -5.6 Net Rating. The clearest relative strength is defensive stops. The lowest relative areas are rebounding, creation, and scoring load.
Relative strengths
- 66th event percentile
Defensive stops
55.7% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Relative weaknesses
- 8th event percentile
Rebounding
0.5 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
- 29th event percentile
Creation
0.5 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
- 37th event percentile
Scoring load
4.0 PPG
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
4.0 PPG
37th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
47.1%
52nd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
47.1%
62nd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
35.3%
39th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
28.6%
context3.5 attempts per game
Floor%
37.0%
39th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.5 APG
29th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
103.0
44th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
105.2
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+2.2
77th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
55.7%
66th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.0 STL+BLK
57th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
7.1
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-5.6
53rd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-7.2
52nd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
51.9
52nd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
53.0
52nd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
0.8%
39th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
0.5 RPG
8th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
4
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
28.8
context7.2 minutes per game.
Sample weight
32.4%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Limited sample
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#91
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
617.7
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
4
GP
4.0
PPG
0.5
RPG
0.5
APG
#91
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
#91/188view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
4.0
PPG
0.5
RPG
0.5
APG
0.3
TOV/G
1.0
3PM/G
47%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
4.0
P37
Playmaking
0.5
P29
Rebounding
0.5
P8
True shooting
47%
P52
Two-way impact
-5.6
P53
Stops
56%
P66
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
35%
6 made / 17 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
29%
4 made / 14 attempts
FT
Free throws
—
0 made / 0 attempts
Shot selection
82% of attempts from three
●2PA 3●3PA 14
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
16
PTS
4.0 / game
6–17
FGM–FGA
4–14
3PM–3PA
0–0
FTM–FTA
creation
2
AST
0.5 / game
1
TOV
0.3 / game
2.00×
AST:TOV
0
FD
rebounding
2
REB
0.5 / game
0
OREB
2
DREB
0.5
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.8 / game
1
BLK
0.3 / game
3
PF
4
STL+BLK
1.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
51.9
HESI
53.0
PI
97.4
ORtg
103.0
DRtg
-5.6
NRtg
-7.2
Stable NRtg
56%
Stop%
37%
Floor%
47%
eFG%
1%
PIE
105.2
Team DRtg
+2.2
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
rank_above · #90Ting-Kuan LiuG · TPErank_below · #92ABDULLAH KABANISF · SYR
//current_rank
#91
of 188 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
#1
Center · AUS
15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG
//event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#89
Point Guard · LBN
17.0 PPG 6.3 RPG 6.7 APG
//event_signalShooter47% 3PT on 5.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalCreator6.7 APGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#90
#92
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
4.0
PPG
0.5
RPG
0.5
APG
0.8
SPG
0.3
BPG
29%
3P%
47%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
4 GP · event rank #91
//quick_read
The line at a glance
4.0
PPG
0.5
RPG
0.5
APG
0.3
TOV/G
1.0
3PM/G
47%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
4.0
P37
Playmaking
0.5
P29
Rebounding
0.5
P8
True shooting
47%
P52
Two-way impact
-5.6
P53
Stops
56%
P66
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
35%
6 made / 17 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
29%
4 made / 14 attempts
FT
Free throws
—
0 made / 0 attempts
Shot selection
82% of attempts from three
●2PA 3●3PA 14
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
16
PTS
4.0 / game
6–17
FGM–FGA
4–14
3PM–3PA
0–0
FTM–FTA
creation
2
AST
0.5 / game
1
TOV
0.3 / game
2.00×
AST:TOV
0
FD
rebounding
2
REB
0.5 / game
0
OREB
2
DREB
0.5
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.8 / game
1
BLK
0.3 / game
3
PF
4
STL+BLK
1.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
51.9
HESI
53.0
PI
97.4
ORtg
103.0
DRtg
-5.6
NRtg
-7.2
Stable NRtg
56%
Stop%
37%
Floor%
47%
eFG%
1%
PIE
105.2
Team DRtg
+2.2
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.