ORtg
100.2
61st event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Combo Guard · TPE · b. 2008
//measurables
186 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring load and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
16.3 PPGScoring load · 93rd event percentile
3.9 APGCreation · 91st event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #90 of 188 · High confidence
HESI
52.4
Event performance
52nd event percentile
PI
53.4
Prospect index
52nd event percentile
ORtg
100.2
Points / 100 poss.
61st event percentile
DRtg
107.1
Lower is better
31st event percentile
NRtg
-7.0
Two-way margin
51st event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 100.2 · 61st event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 107.1 · Stop% 46.0% · Team DRtg 105.2
Sample context
7 games · 235 minutes · 80% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring load and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring load
Creation
Questions for film
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
52.4
52nd event percentile
Prospect index
53.4
52nd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
100.2
61st event percentile
Defensive efficiency
107.1
31st event percentile
Two-way margin
-7.0
51st event percentile
Stop percentage
46.0%
38th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
16.3 PPG
93rd event percentile
Creation
3.9 APG
91st event percentile
Rebounding
5.0 RPG
77th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.9 stocks
89th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
47.5% TS
53rd event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Scorer
16.3 PPG · 93rd event percentile
Creator
3.9 APG · 91st event percentile
Disruptor
2.9 steals + blocks per game · 89th event percentile
Activity
5.0 RPG + 2.9 defensive plays/G · 85th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 52nd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 100.2 ORtg and 107.1 DRtg, producing a -7.0 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring load, creation, and defensive activity. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency and defensive stops.
Scoring load
16.3 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Creation
3.9 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Defensive activity
2.9 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
Defensive efficiency
107.1 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
Defensive stops
46.0% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
100.2
61st event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
16.3 PPG
93rd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
47.5%
53rd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
45.1%
56th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
42.0%
58th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
20.0%
context5.0 attempts per game
Free throws
72.2%
59th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
46.6%
64th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
3.9 APG
91st event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
107.1
31st event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
105.2
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-1.9
51st event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
46.0%
38th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.9 STL+BLK
89th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
47.7
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-7.0
51st event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-7.2
52nd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
52.4
52nd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
53.4
52nd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
8.2%
95th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
5.0 RPG
77th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
234.9
context33.6 minutes per game.
Sample weight
79.7%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
High confidence
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#90
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
617.7
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
7
GP
16.3
PPG
5.0
RPG
3.9
APG
#90
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
16.3
PPG
5.0
RPG
3.9
APG
2.3
TOV/G
1.0
3PM/G
48%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
16.3
P93
Playmaking
3.9
P91
Rebounding
5.0
P77
True shooting
48%
P53
Two-way impact
-7.0
P51
Stops
46%
P38
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
42%
47 made / 112 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
20%
7 made / 35 attempts
FT
Free throws
72%
13 made / 18 attempts
Shot selection
31% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
114
PTS
16.3 / game
47–112
FGM–FGA
7–35
3PM–3PA
13–18
FTM–FTA
creation
27
AST
3.9 / game
16
TOV
2.3 / game
1.69×
AST:TOV
17
FD
rebounding
35
REB
5.0 / game
15
OREB
20
DREB
5.0
REB/G
defense
14
STL
2.0 / game
6
BLK
0.9 / game
12
PF
20
STL+BLK
2.9 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
52.4
HESI
53.4
PI
100.2
ORtg
107.1
DRtg
-7.0
NRtg
-7.2
Stable NRtg
46%
Stop%
47%
Floor%
45%
eFG%
8%
PIE
105.2
Team DRtg
-1.9
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
//current_rank
#90
of 188 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
16.3
PPG
5.0
RPG
3.9
APG
2.0
SPG
0.9
BPG
20%
3P%
48%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #90
//quick_read
16.3
PPG
5.0
RPG
3.9
APG
2.3
TOV/G
1.0
3PM/G
48%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
16.3
P93
Playmaking
3.9
P91
Rebounding
5.0
P77
True shooting
48%
P53
Two-way impact
-7.0
P51
Stops
46%
P38
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
42%
47 made / 112 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
20%
7 made / 35 attempts
FT
Free throws
72%
13 made / 18 attempts
Shot selection
31% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
114
PTS
16.3 / game
47–112
FGM–FGA
7–35
3PM–3PA
13–18
FTM–FTA
creation
27
AST
3.9 / game
16
TOV
2.3 / game
1.69×
AST:TOV
17
FD
rebounding
35
REB
5.0 / game
15
OREB
20
DREB
5.0
REB/G
defense
14
STL
2.0 / game
6
BLK
0.9 / game
12
PF
20
STL+BLK
2.9 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
52.4
HESI
53.4
PI
100.2
ORtg
107.1
DRtg
-7.0
NRtg
-7.2
Stable NRtg
46%
Stop%
47%
Floor%
45%
eFG%
8%
PIE
105.2
Team DRtg
-1.9
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.