Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026

Yousra Dainane

MAR · b. 2008

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Defensive activity-led profile

Defensive activity and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

1.5 stocksDefensive activity · 40th event percentile

3.0 PPGScoring load · 40th event percentile

5.7
HESI v2.1: #135
of 142: 58%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #135 of 142 · Provisional

HESI v2.1

HESI

5.7

Event performance

6th event percentile

16.0

Prospect index

5th event percentile

ORtg

31.2

Points / 100 poss.

16th event percentile

DRtg

80.9

Lower is better

10th event percentile

NRtg

-49.7

Two-way margin

14th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 31.2 · 16th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 80.9 · Stop% 55.1% · Team DRtg 77.8

Sample context

4 games · 84 minutes · 58% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Defensive activity-led profileevent-relative description

Defensive activity and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Defensive activity

1.5 stocks40th event percentile

Scoring load

3.0 PPG40th event percentile

Questions for film

01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
03
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

5.7

6th event percentile

Prospect index

16.0

5th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

31.2

16th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

80.9

10th event percentile

Two-way margin

-49.7

14th event percentile

Stop percentage

55.1%

21st event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

3.0 PPG

40th event percentile

Creation

0.3 APG

23rd event percentile

Rebounding

1.3 RPG

20th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.5 stocks

40th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

23.1% TS

21st event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 6th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 31.2 ORtg and 80.9 DRtg, producing a -49.7 Net Rating. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, two-way margin, and offensive efficiency.

Relative strengths

No available metric currently clears the 65th event percentile.

Relative weaknesses

Defensive efficiency
80.9 DRtg
10th event percentile
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
Two-way margin
-49.7 NRtg
14th event percentile
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
Offensive efficiency
31.2 ORtg
16th event percentile
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

31.2

16th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

3.0 PPG

40th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

23.1%

21st event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

23.1%

33rd event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

15.4%

16th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

18.2%

context

5.5 attempts per game

Floor%

10.5%

10th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.3 APG

23rd event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

80.9

10th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

77.8

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-3.1

37th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

55.1%

21st event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.5 STL+BLK

40th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

21.2

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-49.7

14th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-32.6

6th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

5.7

6th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

16.0

5th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

-14.7%

22nd event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

1.3 RPG

20th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

84.2

context

21.1 minutes per game.

Sample weight

58.4%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Provisional

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#135

context

Among 142 published players.

Team possessions

366.2

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

3.0

PPG

1.3

RPG

0.3

APG

#135

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#135/142view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

3.0

PPG

1.3

RPG

0.3

APG

3.8

TOV/G

1.0

3PM/G

23%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

3.0

P40

Playmaking

0.3

P23

Rebounding

1.3

P20

True shooting

23%

P21

Two-way impact

-49.7

P14

Stops

55%

P21

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

15%

4 made / 26 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

18%

4 made / 22 attempts

Free throws

—

0 made / 0 attempts

Shot selection

85% of attempts from three

●2PA 4●3PA 22

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

3.0 / game

4–26

FGM–FGA

4–22

3PM–3PA

0–0

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

0.3 / game

TOV

3.8 / game

0.07×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

1.3 / game

OREB

DREB

1.3

REB/G

defense

STL

1.5 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

1.5 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

5.7

HESI

16.0

31.2

ORtg

80.9

DRtg

-49.7

NRtg

-32.6

Stable NRtg

55%

Stop%

11%

Floor%

23%

eFG%

-15%

PIE

77.8

Team DRtg

-3.1

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.

rank_above · #134Moudjibath Olamide Achabi TadjouBenin

//current_rank

#135

of 142 ranked

rank_below · #136Kennys Esther Chantaline DogbilikoCentral African Republic

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

3.0

PPG

1.3

RPG

0.3

APG

1.5

SPG

0.0

BPG

18%

3P%

23%

TS%

event_stats