ORtg
112.8
98th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
Couda Keita
Point Guard · MLI · b. 2008
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//measurables
170 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
film-led profileFilm and human evaluation lead this profile.
2 public film items and a finalized scouting report create the clearest current read.
- 2
- film items
- 0
- scout badges
- On file
- scout report
01
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
film_room
Tape & footage
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
Featured clip
ClipStarts muted. Turn sound on in the player.
Clip
vs vs Nigeria U18 · 2026-09-09 · scout: Fahd Wael
YouTube · approved scout evidence
Open sourceMore footage
- Clipvs vs Nigeria U18 · 2026-09-09 · scout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidenceClip
02
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Fahd Wael
Report date: 2026-09-09
verified_human_evaluation
Basketball verdict
Independent scout evaluation · role and translation first
// projected_role
Projected role requires another viewing
Projected role requires another viewing. No separator is established yet
Now · Combo GuardNow · Off GuardProjects · Combo GuardProjects · Off Guard
Translatable strengths
Not confirmed in this report.
Exploitable weaknesses
Not confirmed in this report.
Offensive translation
Offensive translation remains unresolved.
Defensive assignments
Defensive assignments remain unresolved; do not infer them from DRtg.
Best offensive fit
Offensive scheme fit remains unresolved.
Best defensive fit
Defensive scheme fit requires another assignment-confirmed viewing.
Limiting environments
No limiting environment should be stated until role evidence is representative.
Development priorities
No priority confirmed yet.
evidence_and_projection
Why the verdict holds
evidence_strength
strong
4 representative game samples reviewed.
pathway_hypothesis
Insufficient evidence
Insufficient evidence for a basketball pathway conclusion.
Evidence gates incomplete
hesi_reconciliation
Scout view × current production
Agreement and conflict stay visible; they are not averaged into one score.
Current event production
inconclusive100.0 performance rating · rank 1 · 6 games
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Estimated offensive efficiency
inconclusiveORtg 112.8 · descriptive event context, not a role projection
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Floor percentage context
inconclusive49.5% · possession outcome context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Stop percentage context
inconclusive65.6% · box-score estimate with team and role context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
next_evaluation_assignment
Complete at least eight applicable trait observations
03
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #1 of 142 · Established
HESI
100.0
Event performance
99th event percentile
PI
91.5
Prospect index
99th event percentile
ORtg
112.8
Points / 100 poss.
98th event percentile
DRtg
48.9
Lower is better
85th event percentile
NRtg
+63.9
Two-way margin
98th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 112.8 · 98th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 48.9 · Stop% 65.6% · Team DRtg 44.0
Sample context
6 games · 176 minutes · 75% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Two-way event impactevent-relative description
Scoring load and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring load
19.7 PPG99th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
49.2% TS94th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
- 02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
100.0
99th event percentile
Prospect index
91.5
99th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
112.8
98th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
48.9
85th event percentile
Two-way margin
+63.9
98th event percentile
Stop percentage
65.6%
48th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
19.7 PPG
99th event percentile
Creation
3.2 APG
93rd event percentile
Rebounding
4.5 RPG
66th event percentile
Defensive activity
4.0 stocks
59th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
49.2% TS
94th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P99
Scorer
19.7 PPG · 99th event percentile
- P99
Event Impact
100.0 HESI performance · 99th event percentile
- P98
Offensive Impact
112.8 ORtg · 98th event percentile
- P94
Event Efficiency
49% TS on 19.7 PPG · 94th event percentile
- P93
Creator
3.2 APG · 93rd event percentile
Top 3
#1 event rank
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 99th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 112.8 ORtg and 48.9 DRtg, producing a +63.9 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring load, offensive efficiency, and two-way margin.
Relative strengths
- 99th event percentile
Scoring load
19.7 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
- 98th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
112.8 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
- 98th event percentile
Two-way margin
+63.9 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Relative weaknesses
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
19.7 PPG
99th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
49.2%
94th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
45.4%
95th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
38.0%
89th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
25.4%
context10.5 attempts per game
Free throws
74.1%
89th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
49.5%
98th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
3.2 APG
93rd event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
48.9
85th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
44.0
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-4.9
24th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
65.6%
48th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
4.0 STL+BLK
59th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
55.1
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+63.9
98th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+45.5
99th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
100.0
99th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
91.5
99th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
22.1%
98th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
4.5 RPG
66th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
176.0
context29.3 minutes per game.
Sample weight
74.6%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#1
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
572.6
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
19.7
PPG
4.5
RPG
3.2
APG
#1
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#1/142Event board →
6
GP
19.7
PPG
4.5
RPG
3.2
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 142 ranked players
//top_of_the_board
No one ranks above this player in the event.
//current_rank
#1
of 142 ranked
#3
Power Forward · Cameroon
17.7 PPG 16.8 RPG 3.2 APG
//event_signalRebounder16.8 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection3.0 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#4
Small Forward · Côte d'Ivoire
10.7 PPG 7.5 RPG 1.5 APG
//event_signalDisruptor4.5 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalActivity7.5 RPG + 4.5 defensive plays/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#5
Mali
7.3 PPG 2.8 RPG 1.2 APG
//event_signalDisruptor3.3 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
19.7
PPG
4.5
RPG
3.2
APG
4.0
SPG
0.0
BPG
25%
3P%
49%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #1
//quick_read
The line at a glance
19.7
PPG
4.5
RPG
3.2
APG
2.2
TOV/G
2.7
3PM/G
49%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
19.7
P99
Playmaking
3.2
P93
Rebounding
4.5
P66
True shooting
49%
P94
Two-way impact
+63.9
P98
Stops
66%
P48
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
38%
41 made / 108 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
25%
16 made / 63 attempts
FT
Free throws
74%
20 made / 27 attempts
Shot selection
58% of attempts from three
●2PA 45●3PA 63
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
118
PTS
19.7 / game
41–108
FGM–FGA
16–63
3PM–3PA
20–27
FTM–FTA
creation
19
AST
3.2 / game
13
TOV
2.2 / game
1.46×
AST:TOV
18
FD
rebounding
27
REB
4.5 / game
11
OREB
16
DREB
4.5
REB/G
defense
24
STL
4.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
12
PF
24
STL+BLK
4.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
100.0
HESI
91.5
PI
112.8
ORtg
48.9
DRtg
+63.9
NRtg
+45.5
Stable NRtg
66%
Stop%
50%
Floor%
45%
eFG%
22%
PIE
44.0
Team DRtg
-4.9
Def. lift
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.