back_to_rankings
Eveline Toyounon portrait
Unclaimed
event_player

Eveline Toyounon

Power Forward · CMR · b. 2009

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//measurables

192 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Two-way event impact

Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

16.8 RPGRebounding · 99th event percentile

17.7 PPGScoring load · 98th event percentile

97.2
HESI v2.1
#3
of 142
78%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #3 of 142 · High confidence

HESI v2.1

HESI

97.2

Event performance

97th event percentile

PI

90.4

Prospect index

98th event percentile

ORtg

86.1

Points / 100 poss.

88th event percentile

DRtg

48.9

Lower is better

84th event percentile

NRtg

+37.2

Two-way margin

91st event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 86.1 · 88th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 48.9 · Stop% 93.7% · Team DRtg 57.7

Sample context

6 games · 210 minutes · 78% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Two-way event impactevent-relative description

Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Rebounding

16.8 RPG99th event percentile

Scoring load

17.7 PPG98th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

  2. 02

    Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

97.2

97th event percentile

Prospect index

90.4

98th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

86.1

88th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

48.9

84th event percentile

Two-way margin

+37.2

91st event percentile

Stop percentage

93.7%

95th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

17.7 PPG

98th event percentile

Creation

3.2 APG

93rd event percentile

Rebounding

16.8 RPG

99th event percentile

Defensive activity

5.8 stocks

91st event percentile

Scoring efficiency

57.9% TS

98th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P100

    Rebounder

    16.8 RPG · 100th event percentile

  • P100

    Rim Protection

    3.0 BPG · 100th event percentile

  • P98

    Scorer

    17.7 PPG · 98th event percentile

  • P98

    Event Efficiency

    58% TS on 17.7 PPG · 98th event percentile

  • P94

    Activity

    16.8 RPG + 5.8 defensive plays/G · 94th event percentile

  • P94

    Event Impact

    97.2 HESI performance · 94th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 97th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 86.1 ORtg and 48.9 DRtg, producing a +37.2 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are rebounding, scoring load, and scoring efficiency.

Relative strengths

  1. Rebounding

    16.8 RPG

    99th event percentile

    Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.

  2. Scoring load

    17.7 PPG

    98th event percentile

    Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.

  3. Scoring efficiency

    57.9% TS

    98th event percentile

    True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.

Relative weaknesses

No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

86.1

88th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

17.7 PPG

98th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

57.9%

98th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

57.1%

99th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

57.1%

99th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Free throws

52.3%

64th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

45.5%

94th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

3.2 APG

93rd event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

48.9

84th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

57.7

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+8.8

96th event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

93.7%

95th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

5.8 STL+BLK

91st event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

85.8

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+37.2

91st event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+27.0

97th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

97.2

97th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

90.4

98th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

34.5%

99th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

16.8 RPG

99th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

6

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

210.1

context

35.0 minutes per game.

Sample weight

77.8%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

High confidence

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#3

context

Among 142 published players.

Team possessions

534.0

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

6

GP

17.7

PPG

16.8

RPG

3.2

APG

#3

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

6

GP

17.7

PPG

16.8

RPG

3.2

APG

Full statistics →
event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 142 ranked players

  • Couda Keita portrait#1

    Couda Keita

    Point Guard · Mali

    19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG

    //event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Ivette Bomba portrait#5

    Ivette Bomba

    Mali

    7.3 PPG 2.8 RPG 1.2 APG

    //event_signalDisruptor3.3 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

6

GP

17.7

PPG

16.8

RPG

3.2

APG

2.8

SPG

3.0

BPG

—

3P%

58%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

6 GP · event rank #3

//quick_read

The line at a glance

17.7

PPG

16.8

RPG

3.2

APG

7.0

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

58%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

17.7

P98

Playmaking

3.2

P93

Rebounding

16.8

P100

True shooting

58%

P98

Two-way impact

+37.2

P91

Stops

94%

P95

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

57%

36 made / 63 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

—

0 made / 0 attempts

FT

Free throws

52%

34 made / 65 attempts

Shot selection

0% of attempts from three

●2PA 63●3PA 0

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

106

PTS

17.7 / game

36–63

FGM–FGA

0–0

3PM–3PA

34–65

FTM–FTA

creation

19

AST

3.2 / game

42

TOV

7.0 / game

0.45×

AST:TOV

47

FD

rebounding

101

REB

16.8 / game

38

OREB

63

DREB

16.8

REB/G

defense

17

STL

2.8 / game

18

BLK

3.0 / game

21

PF

35

STL+BLK

5.8 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

97.2

HESI

90.4

PI

86.1

ORtg

48.9

DRtg

+37.2

NRtg

+27.0

Stable NRtg

94%

Stop%

45%

Floor%

57%

eFG%

34%

PIE

57.7

Team DRtg

+8.8

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games210 minutes35.0 min/game78% sample weightrank #3 of 142

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.