back_to_rankings
Suzane Fatoumata Dembele portrait
Unclaimed
event_player

Suzane Fatoumata Dembele

Point Guard · MLI · b. 2008

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//measurables

172 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Two-way event impact

Scoring load and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

15.8 PPGScoring load · 96th event percentile

50.6% TSScoring efficiency · 95th event percentile

99.3
HESI v2.1
#2
of 142
71%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #2 of 142 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

99.3

Event performance

99th event percentile

PI

90.9

Prospect index

99th event percentile

ORtg

113.5

Points / 100 poss.

99th event percentile

DRtg

46.0

Lower is better

89th event percentile

NRtg

+67.5

Two-way margin

99th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 113.5 · 99th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 46.0 · Stop% 72.7% · Team DRtg 44.0

Sample context

6 games · 144 minutes · 71% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Two-way event impactevent-relative description

Scoring load and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring load

15.8 PPG96th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

50.6% TS95th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

  2. 02

    Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

99.3

99th event percentile

Prospect index

90.9

99th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

113.5

99th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

46.0

89th event percentile

Two-way margin

+67.5

99th event percentile

Stop percentage

72.7%

75th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

15.8 PPG

96th event percentile

Creation

3.5 APG

94th event percentile

Rebounding

5.5 RPG

75th event percentile

Defensive activity

3.7 stocks

58th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

50.6% TS

95th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P99

    Event Impact

    99.3 HESI performance · 99th event percentile

  • P99

    Offensive Impact

    113.5 ORtg · 99th event percentile

  • P96

    Scorer

    15.8 PPG · 96th event percentile

  • P95

    Event Efficiency

    51% TS on 15.8 PPG · 95th event percentile

  • P94

    Creator

    3.5 APG · 94th event percentile

  • P93

    Two-Way Impact

    +67.5 Net Rating · 93rd event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 99th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 113.5 ORtg and 46.0 DRtg, producing a +67.5 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are offensive efficiency, two-way margin, and scoring load.

Relative strengths

  1. Offensive efficiency

    113.5 ORtg

    99th event percentile

    The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.

  2. Two-way margin

    +67.5 NRtg

    99th event percentile

    The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.

  3. Scoring load

    15.8 PPG

    96th event percentile

    Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.

Relative weaknesses

No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

113.5

99th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

15.8 PPG

96th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

50.6%

95th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

48.8%

97th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

46.3%

97th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

21.1%

context

3.2 attempts per game

Free throws

55.6%

67th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

55.7%

99th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

3.5 APG

94th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

46.0

89th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

44.0

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-2.0

47th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

72.7%

75th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

3.7 STL+BLK

58th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

50.0

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+67.5

99th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+45.1

99th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

99.3

99th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

90.9

99th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

24.0%

99th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

5.5 RPG

75th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

6

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

144.0

context

24.0 minutes per game.

Sample weight

70.6%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#2

context

Among 142 published players.

Team possessions

572.6

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

6

GP

15.8

PPG

5.5

RPG

3.5

APG

#2

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

6

GP

15.8

PPG

5.5

RPG

3.5

APG

Full statistics →
event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 142 ranked players

  • MARLYNE ESTHER ADAHE portrait#4

    MARLYNE ESTHER ADAHE

    Small Forward · Côte d'Ivoire

    10.7 PPG 7.5 RPG 1.5 APG

    //event_signalDisruptor4.5 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalActivity7.5 RPG + 4.5 defensive plays/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Ivette Bomba portrait#5

    Ivette Bomba

    Mali

    7.3 PPG 2.8 RPG 1.2 APG

    //event_signalDisruptor3.3 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

6

GP

15.8

PPG

5.5

RPG

3.5

APG

3.7

SPG

0.0

BPG

21%

3P%

51%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

6 GP · event rank #2

//quick_read

The line at a glance

15.8

PPG

5.5

RPG

3.5

APG

1.7

TOV/G

0.7

3PM/G

51%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

15.8

P96

Playmaking

3.5

P94

Rebounding

5.5

P75

True shooting

51%

P95

Two-way impact

+67.5

P99

Stops

73%

P75

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

46%

38 made / 82 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

21%

4 made / 19 attempts

FT

Free throws

56%

15 made / 27 attempts

Shot selection

23% of attempts from three

●2PA 63●3PA 19

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

95

PTS

15.8 / game

38–82

FGM–FGA

4–19

3PM–3PA

15–27

FTM–FTA

creation

21

AST

3.5 / game

10

TOV

1.7 / game

2.10×

AST:TOV

17

FD

rebounding

33

REB

5.5 / game

15

OREB

18

DREB

5.5

REB/G

defense

22

STL

3.7 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

7

PF

22

STL+BLK

3.7 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

99.3

HESI

90.9

PI

113.5

ORtg

46.0

DRtg

+67.5

NRtg

+45.1

Stable NRtg

73%

Stop%

56%

Floor%

49%

eFG%

24%

PIE

44.0

Team DRtg

-2.0

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games144 minutes24.0 min/game71% sample weightrank #2 of 142

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.