back_to_rankings
MARLYNE ESTHER ADAHE portrait
Unclaimed
event_player

MARLYNE ESTHER ADAHE

Small Forward · CIV · b. 2008

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//measurables

188 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

film-led profile

Film and human evaluation lead this profile.

4 public film items and a finalized scouting report create the clearest current read.

4
film items
0
scout badges
On file
scout report

01

//film_room

Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.

film_room

Tape & footage

Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.

Featured clip

Clip

Starts muted. Turn sound on in the player.

Clip

vs vs Kenya U18 · 2026-09-09 · scout: Fahd Wael

YouTube · approved scout evidence

Open source

More footage

  • Clipvs vs Kenya U18 · 2026-09-09 · scout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidence
    Clip
  • Clipvs vs Uganda U18 · 2026-09-09 · scout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidence
    Clip
  • Clipvs vs Uganda U18 · 2026-09-09 · scout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidence
    Clip

02

//human_evaluation

Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.

//scouting_report · evidence_basis

Scouting report on file

Fahd Wael

Report date: 2026-09-09

verified_human_evaluation

Basketball verdict

Independent scout evaluation · role and translation first

// projected_role

forward · big · screen-and-roll finisher · offensive rebounder · expanded short-roll connector

forward · big · screen-and-roll finisher · offensive rebounder · expanded short-roll connector. No separator is established yet Primary pressure points: Post play, Low-defender rotations, Switching.

Now · ForwardNow · BigProjects · ForwardProjects · Big

Translatable strengths

Not confirmed in this report.

Exploitable weaknesses

  • · Post play
  • · Low-defender rotations
  • · Switching

Offensive translation

Projects to retain a primary role as a screen-and-roll finisher. Projects to retain a primary role as a offensive rebounder. Can take on more short-roll connector responsibility at the target level. post / mismatch option usage likely scales down from the current situational load.

Defensive assignments

primary post matchup defender (grade 3; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary rim protector (grade 3; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). situational low-man / back-line rotator (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). situational switch defender (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload should hold).

Best offensive fit

Offensive scheme fit remains unresolved.

Best defensive fit

Defensive scheme fit requires another assignment-confirmed viewing.

Limiting environments

No limiting environment should be stated until role evidence is representative.

Development priorities

Post play · Low-defender rotations

evidence_and_projection

Why the verdict holds

evidence_strength

strong

3 representative game samples reviewed.

pathway_hypothesis

LM D1

Low-major NCAA Division I hypothesis · experimental uncalibrated

Experimental · not outcome-calibrated

hesi_reconciliation

Scout view × current production

Agreement and conflict stay visible; they are not averaged into one score.

Current event production

inconclusive

98.6 performance rating · rank 4 · 6 games

Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.

Estimated offensive efficiency

inconclusive

ORtg 84.3 · descriptive event context, not a role projection

Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.

Floor percentage context

inconclusive

42.2% · possession outcome context

Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.

Stop percentage context

inconclusive

87.2% · box-score estimate with team and role context

Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.

next_evaluation_assignment

Back-test this pathway hypothesis against real recruited-athlete outcomes before treating it as calibrated.

03

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #4 of 142 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

98.6

Event performance

98th event percentile

PI

90.4

Prospect index

98th event percentile

ORtg

84.3

Points / 100 poss.

87th event percentile

DRtg

38.4

Lower is better

95th event percentile

NRtg

+45.9

Two-way margin

95th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 84.3 · 87th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 38.4 · Stop% 87.2% · Team DRtg 41.7

Sample context

6 games · 147 minutes · 71% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Two-way event impactevent-relative description

Defensive activity and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Defensive activity

4.5 stocks91st event percentile

Scoring load

10.7 PPG90th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?

  2. 02

    Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

98.6

98th event percentile

Prospect index

90.4

98th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

84.3

87th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

38.4

95th event percentile

Two-way margin

+45.9

95th event percentile

Stop percentage

87.2%

90th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

10.7 PPG

90th event percentile

Creation

1.5 APG

68th event percentile

Rebounding

7.5 RPG

88th event percentile

Defensive activity

4.5 stocks

91st event percentile

Scoring efficiency

45.5% TS

89th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P97

    Event Impact

    98.6 HESI performance · 97th event percentile

  • P96

    Rim Protection

    1.3 BPG · 96th event percentile

  • P93

    Defensive Impact

    38.4 DRtg · 87% Stop% · 93rd event percentile

  • P92

    Two-Way Impact

    +45.9 Net Rating · 92nd event percentile

  • P91

    Disruptor

    4.5 steals + blocks per game · 91st event percentile

  • P90

    Activity

    7.5 RPG + 4.5 defensive plays/G · 90th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 98th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 84.3 ORtg and 38.4 DRtg, producing a +45.9 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency, two-way margin, and defensive activity.

Relative strengths

  1. Defensive efficiency

    38.4 DRtg

    95th event percentile

    The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.

  2. Two-way margin

    +45.9 NRtg

    95th event percentile

    The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.

  3. Defensive activity

    4.5 steals + blocks/G

    91st event percentile

    Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.

Relative weaknesses

No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

84.3

87th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

10.7 PPG

90th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

45.5%

89th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

42.6%

90th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

38.9%

90th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

33.3%

context

2.0 attempts per game

Free throws

48.6%

43rd event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

42.2%

90th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.5 APG

68th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

38.4

95th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

41.7

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+3.3

83rd event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

87.2%

90th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

4.5 STL+BLK

91st event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

57.8

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+45.9

95th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+30.1

98th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

98.6

98th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

90.4

98th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

36.8%

91st event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

7.5 RPG

88th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

6

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

146.7

context

24.4 minutes per game.

Sample weight

71.0%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#4

context

Among 142 published players.

Team possessions

542.2

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

04

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

6

GP

10.7

PPG

7.5

RPG

1.5

APG

#4

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

6

GP

10.7

PPG

7.5

RPG

1.5

APG

Full statistics →
event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 142 ranked players

  • Couda Keita portrait#1

    Couda Keita

    Point Guard · Mali

    19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG

    //event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Suzane Fatoumata Dembele portrait#2

    Suzane Fatoumata Dembele

    Point Guard · Mali

    15.8 PPG 5.5 RPG 3.5 APG

    //event_signalDisruptor3.7 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalTop 3#2 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

05

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

6

GP

10.7

PPG

7.5

RPG

1.5

APG

3.2

SPG

1.3

BPG

33%

3P%

46%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

6 GP · event rank #4

//quick_read

The line at a glance

10.7

PPG

7.5

RPG

1.5

APG

3.3

TOV/G

0.7

3PM/G

46%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

10.7

P90

Playmaking

1.5

P68

Rebounding

7.5

P88

True shooting

46%

P89

Two-way impact

+45.9

P95

Stops

87%

P90

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

39%

21 made / 54 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

33%

4 made / 12 attempts

FT

Free throws

49%

18 made / 37 attempts

Shot selection

22% of attempts from three

●2PA 42●3PA 12

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

64

PTS

10.7 / game

21–54

FGM–FGA

4–12

3PM–3PA

18–37

FTM–FTA

creation

9

AST

1.5 / game

20

TOV

3.3 / game

0.45×

AST:TOV

23

FD

rebounding

45

REB

7.5 / game

20

OREB

25

DREB

7.5

REB/G

defense

19

STL

3.2 / game

8

BLK

1.3 / game

15

PF

27

STL+BLK

4.5 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

98.6

HESI

90.4

PI

84.3

ORtg

38.4

DRtg

+45.9

NRtg

+30.1

Stable NRtg

87%

Stop%

42%

Floor%

43%

eFG%

37%

PIE

41.7

Team DRtg

+3.3

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games147 minutes24.4 min/game71% sample weightrank #4 of 142

06

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.