ORtg
84.3
87th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Small Forward · CIV · b. 2008
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//measurables
188 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
film-led profile4 public film items and a finalized scouting report create the clearest current read.
01
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
Featured clip
ClipStarts muted. Turn sound on in the player.
Clip
vs vs Kenya U18 · 2026-09-09 · scout: Fahd Wael
YouTube · approved scout evidence
Open source02
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Fahd Wael
Report date: 2026-09-09
Independent scout evaluation · role and translation first
// projected_role
forward · big · screen-and-roll finisher · offensive rebounder · expanded short-roll connector
forward · big · screen-and-roll finisher · offensive rebounder · expanded short-roll connector. No separator is established yet Primary pressure points: Post play, Low-defender rotations, Switching.
Translatable strengths
Not confirmed in this report.
Exploitable weaknesses
Offensive translation
Projects to retain a primary role as a screen-and-roll finisher. Projects to retain a primary role as a offensive rebounder. Can take on more short-roll connector responsibility at the target level. post / mismatch option usage likely scales down from the current situational load.
Defensive assignments
primary post matchup defender (grade 3; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary rim protector (grade 3; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). situational low-man / back-line rotator (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). situational switch defender (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload should hold).
Best offensive fit
Offensive scheme fit remains unresolved.
Best defensive fit
Defensive scheme fit requires another assignment-confirmed viewing.
Limiting environments
No limiting environment should be stated until role evidence is representative.
Development priorities
Post play · Low-defender rotations
evidence_strength
strong
3 representative game samples reviewed.
pathway_hypothesis
LM D1
Low-major NCAA Division I hypothesis · experimental uncalibrated
Experimental · not outcome-calibrated
Agreement and conflict stay visible; they are not averaged into one score.
Current event production
inconclusive98.6 performance rating · rank 4 · 6 games
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Estimated offensive efficiency
inconclusiveORtg 84.3 · descriptive event context, not a role projection
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Floor percentage context
inconclusive42.2% · possession outcome context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Stop percentage context
inconclusive87.2% · box-score estimate with team and role context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
next_evaluation_assignment
Back-test this pathway hypothesis against real recruited-athlete outcomes before treating it as calibrated.
03
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #4 of 142 · Established
HESI
98.6
Event performance
98th event percentile
PI
90.4
Prospect index
98th event percentile
ORtg
84.3
Points / 100 poss.
87th event percentile
DRtg
38.4
Lower is better
95th event percentile
NRtg
+45.9
Two-way margin
95th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 84.3 · 87th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 38.4 · Stop% 87.2% · Team DRtg 41.7
Sample context
6 games · 147 minutes · 71% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Defensive activity and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Defensive activity
Scoring load
Questions for film
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
98.6
98th event percentile
Prospect index
90.4
98th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
84.3
87th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
38.4
95th event percentile
Two-way margin
+45.9
95th event percentile
Stop percentage
87.2%
90th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
10.7 PPG
90th event percentile
Creation
1.5 APG
68th event percentile
Rebounding
7.5 RPG
88th event percentile
Defensive activity
4.5 stocks
91st event percentile
Scoring efficiency
45.5% TS
89th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Event Impact
98.6 HESI performance · 97th event percentile
Rim Protection
1.3 BPG · 96th event percentile
Defensive Impact
38.4 DRtg · 87% Stop% · 93rd event percentile
Two-Way Impact
+45.9 Net Rating · 92nd event percentile
Disruptor
4.5 steals + blocks per game · 91st event percentile
Activity
7.5 RPG + 4.5 defensive plays/G · 90th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 98th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 84.3 ORtg and 38.4 DRtg, producing a +45.9 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency, two-way margin, and defensive activity.
Defensive efficiency
38.4 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Two-way margin
+45.9 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Defensive activity
4.5 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
84.3
87th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
10.7 PPG
90th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
45.5%
89th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
42.6%
90th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
38.9%
90th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
33.3%
context2.0 attempts per game
Free throws
48.6%
43rd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
42.2%
90th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.5 APG
68th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
38.4
95th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
41.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+3.3
83rd event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
87.2%
90th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
4.5 STL+BLK
91st event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
57.8
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+45.9
95th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+30.1
98th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
98.6
98th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
90.4
98th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
36.8%
91st event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
7.5 RPG
88th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
146.7
context24.4 minutes per game.
Sample weight
71.0%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#4
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
542.2
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
10.7
PPG
7.5
RPG
1.5
APG
#4
RANK
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
10.7
PPG
7.5
RPG
1.5
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 142 ranked players
//current_rank
#4
of 142 ranked
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
10.7
PPG
7.5
RPG
1.5
APG
3.2
SPG
1.3
BPG
33%
3P%
46%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #4
//quick_read
10.7
PPG
7.5
RPG
1.5
APG
3.3
TOV/G
0.7
3PM/G
46%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
10.7
P90
Playmaking
1.5
P68
Rebounding
7.5
P88
True shooting
46%
P89
Two-way impact
+45.9
P95
Stops
87%
P90
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
39%
21 made / 54 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
33%
4 made / 12 attempts
FT
Free throws
49%
18 made / 37 attempts
Shot selection
22% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
64
PTS
10.7 / game
21–54
FGM–FGA
4–12
3PM–3PA
18–37
FTM–FTA
creation
9
AST
1.5 / game
20
TOV
3.3 / game
0.45×
AST:TOV
23
FD
rebounding
45
REB
7.5 / game
20
OREB
25
DREB
7.5
REB/G
defense
19
STL
3.2 / game
8
BLK
1.3 / game
15
PF
27
STL+BLK
4.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
98.6
HESI
90.4
PI
84.3
ORtg
38.4
DRtg
+45.9
NRtg
+30.1
Stable NRtg
87%
Stop%
42%
Floor%
43%
eFG%
37%
PIE
41.7
Team DRtg
+3.3
Def. lift
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.