ORtg
98.0
98th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
Ivette Bomba
MLI · b. 2008
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileTwo-way event impact
Scoring load and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
7.3 PPGScoring load · 79th event percentile
42.3% TSScoring efficiency · 78th event percentile
- 97.9
- HESI v2.1
- #5
- of 142
- 66%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #5 of 142 · Established
HESI
97.9
Event performance
98th event percentile
PI
89.8
Prospect index
97th event percentile
ORtg
98.0
Points / 100 poss.
98th event percentile
DRtg
48.3
Lower is better
86th event percentile
NRtg
+49.7
Two-way margin
97th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 98.0 · 98th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 48.3 · Stop% 67.0% · Team DRtg 44.0
Sample context
6 games · 116 minutes · 66% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Two-way event impactevent-relative description
Scoring load and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring load
7.3 PPG79th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
42.3% TS78th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
97.9
98th event percentile
Prospect index
89.8
97th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
98.0
98th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
48.3
86th event percentile
Two-way margin
+49.7
97th event percentile
Stop percentage
67.0%
57th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
7.3 PPG
79th event percentile
Creation
1.2 APG
57th event percentile
Rebounding
2.8 RPG
43rd event percentile
Defensive activity
3.3 stocks
56th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
42.3% TS
78th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P98
Offensive Impact
98.0 ORtg · 98th event percentile
- P97
Event Impact
97.9 HESI performance · 97th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 98th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 98.0 ORtg and 48.3 DRtg, producing a +49.7 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are offensive efficiency, two-way margin, and defensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 98th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
98.0 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
- 97th event percentile
Two-way margin
+49.7 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
- 86th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
48.3 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Relative weaknesses
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
7.3 PPG
79th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
42.3%
78th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
42.2%
89th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
37.8%
88th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
18.2%
context3.7 attempts per game
Free throws
37.5%
27th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
46.9%
97th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.2 APG
57th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
48.3
86th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
44.0
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-4.3
27th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
67.0%
57th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
3.3 STL+BLK
56th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
37.2
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+49.7
97th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+29.9
98th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
97.9
98th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
89.8
97th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
5.3%
79th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
2.8 RPG
43rd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
116.3
context19.4 minutes per game.
Sample weight
66.0%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#5
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
572.6
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
7.3
PPG
2.8
RPG
1.2
APG
#5
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#5/142Event board →
6
GP
7.3
PPG
2.8
RPG
1.2
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 142 ranked players
rank_above · #4MARLYNE ESTHER ADAHESF · Côte d'Ivoirerank_below · #6Assan Bagnine MarikoC · Mali
//current_rank
#5
of 142 ranked
#1
Point Guard · Mali
19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG
//event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#3
Power Forward · Cameroon
17.7 PPG 16.8 RPG 3.2 APG
//event_signalRebounder16.8 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection3.0 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
7.3
PPG
2.8
RPG
1.2
APG
3.3
SPG
0.0
BPG
18%
3P%
42%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #5
//quick_read
The line at a glance
7.3
PPG
2.8
RPG
1.2
APG
1.0
TOV/G
0.7
3PM/G
42%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
7.3
P79
Playmaking
1.2
P57
Rebounding
2.8
P43
True shooting
42%
P78
Two-way impact
+49.7
P97
Stops
67%
P57
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
38%
17 made / 45 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
18%
4 made / 22 attempts
FT
Free throws
38%
6 made / 16 attempts
Shot selection
49% of attempts from three
●2PA 23●3PA 22
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
44
PTS
7.3 / game
17–45
FGM–FGA
4–22
3PM–3PA
6–16
FTM–FTA
creation
7
AST
1.2 / game
6
TOV
1.0 / game
1.17×
AST:TOV
11
FD
rebounding
17
REB
2.8 / game
14
OREB
3
DREB
2.8
REB/G
defense
20
STL
3.3 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
17
PF
20
STL+BLK
3.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
97.9
HESI
89.8
PI
98.0
ORtg
48.3
DRtg
+49.7
NRtg
+29.9
Stable NRtg
67%
Stop%
47%
Floor%
42%
eFG%
5%
PIE
44.0
Team DRtg
-4.3
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.