ORtg
78.4
80th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Center · MLI · b. 2008
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//measurables
180 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
film-led profile5 public film items and a finalized scouting report create the clearest current read.
01
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
Featured clip
ClipStarts muted. Turn sound on in the player.
Clip
vs vs Nigeria U18 · 2026-09-09 · scout: Fahd Wael
YouTube · approved scout evidence
Open source02
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Fahd Wael
Report date: 2026-09-09
Independent scout evaluation · role and translation first
// projected_role
forward · big · screen-and-roll finisher · short-roll connector · post / mismatch option
forward · big · screen-and-roll finisher · short-roll connector · post / mismatch option. No separator is established yet Primary pressure points: Post play, Switching.
Translatable strengths
Not confirmed in this report.
Exploitable weaknesses
Offensive translation
Projects to retain a primary role as a screen-and-roll finisher. Projects to retain a primary role as a short-roll connector. Projects to retain a primary role as a post / mismatch option. Can take on more offensive rebounder responsibility at the target level.
Defensive assignments
primary low-man / back-line rotator (grade 3; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary post matchup defender (grade 3; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary rim protector (grade 3; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). situational switch defender (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload should hold).
Best offensive fit
Offensive scheme fit remains unresolved.
Best defensive fit
Defensive scheme fit requires another assignment-confirmed viewing.
Limiting environments
No limiting environment should be stated until role evidence is representative.
Development priorities
Post play · Switching
evidence_strength
strong
3 representative game samples reviewed.
pathway_hypothesis
NCAA D3
NCAA Division III hypothesis · experimental uncalibrated
Experimental · not outcome-calibrated
Agreement and conflict stay visible; they are not averaged into one score.
Current event production
inconclusive96.5 performance rating · rank 6 · 6 games
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Estimated offensive efficiency
inconclusiveORtg 78.4 · descriptive event context, not a role projection
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Floor percentage context
inconclusive39.5% · possession outcome context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Stop percentage context
inconclusive83.7% · box-score estimate with team and role context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
next_evaluation_assignment
Back-test this pathway hypothesis against real recruited-athlete outcomes before treating it as calibrated.
03
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #6 of 142 · Established
HESI
96.5
Event performance
96th event percentile
PI
88.7
Prospect index
96th event percentile
ORtg
78.4
Points / 100 poss.
80th event percentile
DRtg
41.7
Lower is better
93rd event percentile
NRtg
+36.8
Two-way margin
90th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 78.4 · 80th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 41.7 · Stop% 83.7% · Team DRtg 44.0
Sample context
6 games · 191 minutes · 76% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
Defensive activity
Questions for film
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
96.5
96th event percentile
Prospect index
88.7
96th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
78.4
80th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
41.7
93rd event percentile
Two-way margin
+36.8
90th event percentile
Stop percentage
83.7%
88th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
10.0 PPG
88th event percentile
Creation
2.3 APG
83rd event percentile
Rebounding
15.3 RPG
99th event percentile
Defensive activity
5.5 stocks
95th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
31.2% TS
45th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Rebounder
15.3 RPG · 99th event percentile
Rim Protection
1.8 BPG · 98th event percentile
Activity
15.3 RPG + 5.5 defensive plays/G · 96th event percentile
Disruptor
5.5 steals + blocks per game · 95th event percentile
Event Impact
96.5 HESI performance · 93rd event percentile
Defensive Impact
41.7 DRtg · 84% Stop% · 90th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 96th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 78.4 ORtg and 41.7 DRtg, producing a +36.8 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are rebounding, defensive activity, and defensive efficiency.
Rebounding
15.3 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Defensive activity
5.5 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
Defensive efficiency
41.7 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
78.4
80th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
10.0 PPG
88th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
31.2%
45th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
30.8%
53rd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
30.8%
65th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
0.0%
context2.8 attempts per game
Free throws
33.3%
24th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
39.5%
84th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.3 APG
83rd event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
41.7
93rd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
44.0
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+2.3
80th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
83.7%
88th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
5.5 STL+BLK
95th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
76.3
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+36.8
90th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+25.9
96th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
96.5
96th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
88.7
96th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
18.3%
96th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
15.3 RPG
99th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
191.0
context31.8 minutes per game.
Sample weight
76.1%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#6
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
572.6
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
10.0
PPG
15.3
RPG
2.3
APG
#6
RANK
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
10.0
PPG
15.3
RPG
2.3
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 142 ranked players
//current_rank
#6
of 142 ranked
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
10.0
PPG
15.3
RPG
2.3
APG
3.7
SPG
1.8
BPG
0%
3P%
31%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #6
//quick_read
10.0
PPG
15.3
RPG
2.3
APG
3.0
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
31%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
10.0
P88
Playmaking
2.3
P83
Rebounding
15.3
P99
True shooting
31%
P45
Two-way impact
+36.8
P90
Stops
84%
P88
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
31%
28 made / 91 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 17 attempts
FT
Free throws
33%
4 made / 12 attempts
Shot selection
19% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
60
PTS
10.0 / game
28–91
FGM–FGA
0–17
3PM–3PA
4–12
FTM–FTA
creation
14
AST
2.3 / game
18
TOV
3.0 / game
0.78×
AST:TOV
12
FD
rebounding
92
REB
15.3 / game
45
OREB
47
DREB
15.3
REB/G
defense
22
STL
3.7 / game
11
BLK
1.8 / game
13
PF
33
STL+BLK
5.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
96.5
HESI
88.7
PI
78.4
ORtg
41.7
DRtg
+36.8
NRtg
+25.9
Stable NRtg
84%
Stop%
39%
Floor%
31%
eFG%
18%
PIE
44.0
Team DRtg
+2.3
Def. lift
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.