ORtg
74.2
73rd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Point Guard · CIV · b. 2008
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//measurables
162 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
film-led profile5 public film items and a finalized scouting report create the clearest current read.
01
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
Featured clip
ClipStarts muted. Turn sound on in the player.
Clip
vs vs egypt U18 · 2026-09-09 · scout: Fahd Wael
YouTube · approved scout evidence
Open source02
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Fahd Wael
Report date: 2026-09-09
Independent scout evaluation · role and translation first
// projected_role
lead_guard · combo_guard · expanded on-ball creator · expanded secondary creator / connector
lead_guard · combo_guard · expanded on-ball creator · expanded secondary creator / connector. No separator is established yet Primary pressure points: Primary initiation, Advantage extension, Point-of-attack defense.
Translatable strengths
Not confirmed in this report.
Exploitable weaknesses
Offensive translation
Can take on more on-ball creator responsibility at the target level. Can take on more secondary creator / connector responsibility at the target level.
Defensive assignments
primary point-of-attack / screen navigator (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload can expand). situational gap / nail helper (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload should hold).
Best offensive fit
Offensive scheme fit remains unresolved.
Best defensive fit
Defensive scheme fit requires another assignment-confirmed viewing.
Limiting environments
No limiting environment should be stated until role evidence is representative.
Development priorities
Primary initiation · Advantage extension
evidence_strength
strong
3 representative game samples reviewed.
pathway_hypothesis
Insufficient evidence
Insufficient evidence for a basketball pathway conclusion.
Evidence gates incomplete
Agreement and conflict stay visible; they are not averaged into one score.
Current event production
inconclusive95.7 performance rating · rank 7 · 6 games
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Estimated offensive efficiency
inconclusiveORtg 74.2 · descriptive event context, not a role projection
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Floor percentage context
inconclusive38.8% · possession outcome context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Stop percentage context
inconclusive90.9% · box-score estimate with team and role context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
next_evaluation_assignment
Complete at least eight applicable trait observations
03
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #7 of 142 · Established
HESI
95.7
Event performance
95th event percentile
PI
88.1
Prospect index
95th event percentile
ORtg
74.2
Points / 100 poss.
73rd event percentile
DRtg
37.0
Lower is better
98th event percentile
NRtg
+37.3
Two-way margin
92nd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 74.2 · 73rd event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 37.0 · Stop% 90.9% · Team DRtg 41.7
Sample context
6 games · 161 minutes · 73% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
Scoring load
Questions for film
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
95.7
95th event percentile
Prospect index
88.1
95th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
74.2
73rd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
37.0
98th event percentile
Two-way margin
+37.3
92nd event percentile
Stop percentage
90.9%
94th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
10.0 PPG
88th event percentile
Creation
4.5 APG
97th event percentile
Rebounding
4.0 RPG
60th event percentile
Defensive activity
5.7 stocks
76th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
39.6% TS
70th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Creator
4.5 APG · 97th event percentile
Defensive Impact
37.0 DRtg · 91% Stop% · 96th event percentile
Event Impact
95.7 HESI performance · 94th event percentile
Scorer
10.0 PPG · 88th event percentile
Two-Way Impact
+37.3 Net Rating · 87th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 95th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 74.2 ORtg and 37.0 DRtg, producing a +37.3 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency, creation, and defensive stops.
Defensive efficiency
37.0 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Creation
4.5 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Defensive stops
90.9% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
74.2
73rd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
10.0 PPG
88th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
39.6%
70th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
36.6%
72nd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
35.7%
79th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
9.1%
context1.8 attempts per game
Free throws
42.2%
32nd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
38.8%
81st event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
4.5 APG
97th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
37.0
98th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
41.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+4.7
87th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
90.9%
94th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
5.7 STL+BLK
76th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
66.1
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+37.3
92nd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+24.8
95th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
95.7
95th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
88.1
95th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
28.4%
88th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
4.0 RPG
60th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
160.9
context26.8 minutes per game.
Sample weight
72.8%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#7
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
542.2
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
10.0
PPG
4.0
RPG
4.5
APG
#7
RANK
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
10.0
PPG
4.0
RPG
4.5
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 142 ranked players
//current_rank
#7
of 142 ranked
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
10.0
PPG
4.0
RPG
4.5
APG
5.5
SPG
0.2
BPG
9%
3P%
40%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #7
//quick_read
10.0
PPG
4.0
RPG
4.5
APG
4.7
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
40%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
10.0
P88
Playmaking
4.5
P97
Rebounding
4.0
P60
True shooting
40%
P70
Two-way impact
+37.3
P92
Stops
91%
P94
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
36%
20 made / 56 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
9%
1 made / 11 attempts
FT
Free throws
42%
19 made / 45 attempts
Shot selection
20% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
60
PTS
10.0 / game
20–56
FGM–FGA
1–11
3PM–3PA
19–45
FTM–FTA
creation
27
AST
4.5 / game
28
TOV
4.7 / game
0.96×
AST:TOV
30
FD
rebounding
24
REB
4.0 / game
9
OREB
15
DREB
4.0
REB/G
defense
33
STL
5.5 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
16
PF
34
STL+BLK
5.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
95.7
HESI
88.1
PI
74.2
ORtg
37.0
DRtg
+37.3
NRtg
+24.8
Stable NRtg
91%
Stop%
39%
Floor%
37%
eFG%
28%
PIE
41.7
Team DRtg
+4.7
Def. lift
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.