ORtg
81.5
45th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
MEX · b. 2009
//measurables
171 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileCreation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
5.1 APGCreation · 99th event percentile
16.7 PPGScoring load · 98th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #139 of 192 · High confidence
HESI
28.3
Event performance
28th event percentile
PI
37.1
Prospect index
28th event percentile
ORtg
81.5
Points / 100 poss.
45th event percentile
DRtg
93.6
Lower is better
15th event percentile
NRtg
-12.0
Two-way margin
35th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 81.5 · 45th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 93.6 · Stop% 63.1% · Team DRtg 96.5
Sample context
7 games · 253 minutes · 81% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
Scoring load
Questions for film
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
28.3
28th event percentile
Prospect index
37.1
28th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
81.5
45th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
93.6
15th event percentile
Two-way margin
-12.0
35th event percentile
Stop percentage
63.1%
69th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
16.7 PPG
98th event percentile
Creation
5.1 APG
99th event percentile
Rebounding
5.1 RPG
82nd event percentile
Defensive activity
3.3 stocks
76th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
45.5% TS
65th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Creator
5.1 APG · 99th event percentile
Scorer
16.7 PPG · 98th event percentile
Activity
5.1 RPG + 3.3 defensive plays/G · 78th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 28th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 81.5 ORtg and 93.6 DRtg, producing a -12.0 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, scoring load, and rebounding. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency and two-way margin.
Creation
5.1 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Scoring load
16.7 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Rebounding
5.1 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Defensive efficiency
93.6 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
Two-way margin
-12.0 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
81.5
45th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
16.7 PPG
98th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
45.5%
65th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
41.9%
63rd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
39.6%
74th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
19.2%
context3.7 attempts per game
Free throws
60.0%
52nd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
39.8%
55th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
5.1 APG
99th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
93.6
15th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
96.5
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+3.0
83rd event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
63.1%
69th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
3.3 STL+BLK
76th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
64.5
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-12.0
35th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-9.7
28th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
28.3
28th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
37.1
28th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
11.5%
95th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
5.1 RPG
82nd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
253.2
context36.2 minutes per game.
Sample weight
80.8%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
High confidence
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#139
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
565.6
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
16.7
PPG
5.1
RPG
5.1
APG
#139
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
//quick_read
16.7
PPG
5.1
RPG
5.1
APG
4.3
TOV/G
0.7
3PM/G
46%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
16.7
P98
Playmaking
5.1
P99
Rebounding
5.1
P82
True shooting
46%
P65
Two-way impact
-12.0
P35
Stops
63%
P69
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
40%
44 made / 111 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
19%
5 made / 26 attempts
FT
Free throws
60%
24 made / 40 attempts
Shot selection
23% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
117
PTS
16.7 / game
44–111
FGM–FGA
5–26
3PM–3PA
24–40
FTM–FTA
creation
36
AST
5.1 / game
30
TOV
4.3 / game
1.20×
AST:TOV
31
FD
rebounding
36
REB
5.1 / game
2
OREB
34
DREB
5.1
REB/G
defense
21
STL
3.0 / game
2
BLK
0.3 / game
18
PF
23
STL+BLK
3.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
28.3
HESI
37.1
PI
81.5
ORtg
93.6
DRtg
-12.0
NRtg
-9.7
Stable NRtg
63%
Stop%
40%
Floor%
42%
eFG%
11%
PIE
96.5
Team DRtg
+3.0
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
16.7
PPG
5.1
RPG
5.1
APG
3.0
SPG
0.3
BPG
19%
3P%
46%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #139
//quick_read
16.7
PPG
5.1
RPG
5.1
APG
4.3
TOV/G
0.7
3PM/G
46%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
16.7
P98
Playmaking
5.1
P99
Rebounding
5.1
P82
True shooting
46%
P65
Two-way impact
-12.0
P35
Stops
63%
P69
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
40%
44 made / 111 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
19%
5 made / 26 attempts
FT
Free throws
60%
24 made / 40 attempts
Shot selection
23% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
117
PTS
16.7 / game
44–111
FGM–FGA
5–26
3PM–3PA
24–40
FTM–FTA
creation
36
AST
5.1 / game
30
TOV
4.3 / game
1.20×
AST:TOV
31
FD
rebounding
36
REB
5.1 / game
2
OREB
34
DREB
5.1
REB/G
defense
21
STL
3.0 / game
2
BLK
0.3 / game
18
PF
23
STL+BLK
3.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
28.3
HESI
37.1
PI
81.5
ORtg
93.6
DRtg
-12.0
NRtg
-9.7
Stable NRtg
63%
Stop%
40%
Floor%
42%
eFG%
11%
PIE
96.5
Team DRtg
+3.0
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.