ORtg
75.0
76th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Fatima Diouf
CIV · b. 2009
//measurables
177 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileTwo-way event impact
Scoring load and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalScorer16.3 PPG · 98th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Impact89.4 HESI performance · 86th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalTwo-Way Impact+29.1 Net Rating · 79th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
16.3 PPGScoring load · 98th event percentile
36.1% TSScoring efficiency · 58th event percentile
- 89.4
- HESI v2.1
- #16
- of 142
- 74%
- sample weight
Performance
2 rated events
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #16 of 142 · Established
HESI
89.4
Event performance
89th event percentile
PI
84.2
Prospect index
89th event percentile
ORtg
75.0
Points / 100 poss.
76th event percentile
DRtg
45.9
Lower is better
90th event percentile
NRtg
+29.1
Two-way margin
83rd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 75.0 · 76th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 45.9 · Stop% 68.4% · Team DRtg 41.7
Sample context
6 games · 167 minutes · 74% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Two-way event impactevent-relative description
Scoring load and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring load
16.3 PPG98th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
36.1% TS58th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
89.4
89th event percentile
Prospect index
84.2
89th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
75.0
76th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
45.9
90th event percentile
Two-way margin
+29.1
83rd event percentile
Stop percentage
68.4%
64th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
16.3 PPG
98th event percentile
Creation
1.0 APG
51st event percentile
Rebounding
3.8 RPG
57th event percentile
Defensive activity
3.7 stocks
58th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
36.1% TS
58th event percentile
//rated_event_history
Every rated competition
Records are shown side by side, not as one trend line. Each event has a different player pool and competition context.
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P98
Scorer
16.3 PPG · 98th event percentile
- P86
Event Impact
89.4 HESI performance · 86th event percentile
- P79
Two-Way Impact
+29.1 Net Rating · 79th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 89th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 75.0 ORtg and 45.9 DRtg, producing a +29.1 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring load, defensive efficiency, and two-way margin.
Relative strengths
- 98th event percentile
Scoring load
16.3 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
- 90th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
45.9 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
- 83rd event percentile
Two-way margin
+29.1 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Relative weaknesses
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
16.3 PPG
98th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
36.1%
58th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
35.2%
68th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
29.7%
58th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
24.5%
context8.8 attempts per game
Free throws
37.5%
27th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
34.7%
71st event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.0 APG
51st event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
45.9
90th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
41.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-4.2
28th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
68.4%
64th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
3.7 STL+BLK
58th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
51.5
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+29.1
83rd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+19.1
89th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
89.4
89th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
84.2
89th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
-2.5%
22nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
3.8 RPG
57th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
166.8
context27.8 minutes per game.
Sample weight
73.5%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#16
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
542.2
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
15.0
PPG
1.6
RPG
1.4
APG
#174
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#16
RANK
142
FIELD
89%
PERCENTILE
16.3
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#174/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
15.0
PPG
1.6
RPG
1.4
APG
3.7
TOV/G
2.4
3PM/G
42%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
15.0
P97
Playmaking
1.4
P58
Rebounding
1.6
P16
True shooting
42%
P49
Two-way impact
-31.7
P17
Stops
48%
P20
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
30%
33 made / 111 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
28%
17 made / 60 attempts
FT
Free throws
65%
22 made / 34 attempts
Shot selection
54% of attempts from three
●2PA 51●3PA 60
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
105
PTS
15.0 / game
33–111
FGM–FGA
17–60
3PM–3PA
22–34
FTM–FTA
creation
10
AST
1.4 / game
26
TOV
3.7 / game
0.38×
AST:TOV
25
FD
rebounding
11
REB
1.6 / game
3
OREB
8
DREB
1.6
REB/G
defense
16
STL
2.3 / game
1
BLK
0.1 / game
14
PF
17
STL+BLK
2.4 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
9.4
HESI
22.0
PI
72.0
ORtg
103.7
DRtg
-31.7
NRtg
-24.3
Stable NRtg
48%
Stop%
31%
Floor%
37%
eFG%
2%
PIE
101.1
Team DRtg
-2.6
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#16/142view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
16.3
PPG
3.8
RPG
1.0
APG
4.2
TOV/G
2.2
3PM/G
36%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
16.3
P98
Playmaking
1.0
P51
Rebounding
3.8
P57
True shooting
36%
P58
Two-way impact
+29.1
P83
Stops
68%
P64
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
30%
35 made / 118 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
25%
13 made / 53 attempts
FT
Free throws
38%
15 made / 40 attempts
Shot selection
45% of attempts from three
●2PA 65●3PA 53
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
98
PTS
16.3 / game
35–118
FGM–FGA
13–53
3PM–3PA
15–40
FTM–FTA
creation
6
AST
1.0 / game
25
TOV
4.2 / game
0.24×
AST:TOV
27
FD
rebounding
23
REB
3.8 / game
14
OREB
9
DREB
3.8
REB/G
defense
22
STL
3.7 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
12
PF
22
STL+BLK
3.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
89.4
HESI
84.2
PI
75.0
ORtg
45.9
DRtg
+29.1
NRtg
+19.1
Stable NRtg
68%
Stop%
35%
Floor%
35%
eFG%
-3%
PIE
41.7
Team DRtg
-4.2
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#1
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#172
#173
#175
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
16.3
PPG
3.8
RPG
1.0
APG
3.7
SPG
0.0
BPG
25%
3P%
36%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #174
//quick_read
The line at a glance
15.0
PPG
1.6
RPG
1.4
APG
3.7
TOV/G
2.4
3PM/G
42%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
15.0
P97
Playmaking
1.4
P58
Rebounding
1.6
P16
True shooting
42%
P49
Two-way impact
-31.7
P17
Stops
48%
P20
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
30%
33 made / 111 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
28%
17 made / 60 attempts
FT
Free throws
65%
22 made / 34 attempts
Shot selection
54% of attempts from three
●2PA 51●3PA 60
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
105
PTS
15.0 / game
33–111
FGM–FGA
17–60
3PM–3PA
22–34
FTM–FTA
creation
10
AST
1.4 / game
26
TOV
3.7 / game
0.38×
AST:TOV
25
FD
rebounding
11
REB
1.6 / game
3
OREB
8
DREB
1.6
REB/G
defense
16
STL
2.3 / game
1
BLK
0.1 / game
14
PF
17
STL+BLK
2.4 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
9.4
HESI
22.0
PI
72.0
ORtg
103.7
DRtg
-31.7
NRtg
-24.3
Stable NRtg
48%
Stop%
31%
Floor%
37%
eFG%
2%
PIE
101.1
Team DRtg
-2.6
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #16
//quick_read
The line at a glance
16.3
PPG
3.8
RPG
1.0
APG
4.2
TOV/G
2.2
3PM/G
36%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
16.3
P98
Playmaking
1.0
P51
Rebounding
3.8
P57
True shooting
36%
P58
Two-way impact
+29.1
P83
Stops
68%
P64
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
30%
35 made / 118 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
25%
13 made / 53 attempts
FT
Free throws
38%
15 made / 40 attempts
Shot selection
45% of attempts from three
●2PA 65●3PA 53
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
98
PTS
16.3 / game
35–118
FGM–FGA
13–53
3PM–3PA
15–40
FTM–FTA
creation
6
AST
1.0 / game
25
TOV
4.2 / game
0.24×
AST:TOV
27
FD
rebounding
23
REB
3.8 / game
14
OREB
9
DREB
3.8
REB/G
defense
22
STL
3.7 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
12
PF
22
STL+BLK
3.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
89.4
HESI
84.2
PI
75.0
ORtg
45.9
DRtg
+29.1
NRtg
+19.1
Stable NRtg
68%
Stop%
35%
Floor%
35%
eFG%
-3%
PIE
41.7
Team DRtg
-4.2
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.