ORtg
41.2
8th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Yiming Wang
CHN · b. 2009
//measurables
191 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileDefensive impact profile
Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
0.8 stocksDefensive activity · 43rd event percentile
2.5 RPGRebounding · 41st event percentile
- 42.9
- HESI v2.1
- #110
- of 192
- 16%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #110 of 192 · Limited sample
HESI
42.9
Event performance
43rd event percentile
PI
48.8
Prospect index
43rd event percentile
ORtg
41.2
Points / 100 poss.
8th event percentile
DRtg
54.7
Lower is better
99th event percentile
NRtg
-13.5
Two-way margin
33rd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 41.2 · 8th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 54.7 · Stop% 1.3% · Team DRtg 85.4
Sample context
4 games · 12 minutes · 16% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Defensive impact profileevent-relative description
Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Defensive activity
0.8 stocks43rd event percentile
Rebounding
2.5 RPG41st event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 03
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
42.9
43rd event percentile
Prospect index
48.8
43rd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
41.2
8th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
54.7
99th event percentile
Two-way margin
-13.5
33rd event percentile
Stop percentage
131.5%
99th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
0.0 PPG
1st event percentile
Creation
0.0 APG
1st event percentile
Rebounding
2.5 RPG
41st event percentile
Defensive activity
0.8 stocks
43rd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
0.0% TS
1st event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 43rd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 41.2 ORtg and 54.7 DRtg, producing a -13.5 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive stops and defensive efficiency. The lowest relative areas are creation, scoring load, and scoring efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 99th event percentile
Defensive stops
1.3% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
- 99th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
54.7 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Relative weaknesses
- 1st event percentile
Creation
0.0 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
- 1st event percentile
Scoring load
0.0 PPG
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.
- 1st event percentile
Scoring efficiency
0.0% TS
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
0.0 PPG
1st event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
0.0%
1st event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
0.0%
3rd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
0.0%
3rd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Floor%
19.2%
8th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.0 APG
1st event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
54.7
99th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
85.4
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+30.7
99th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
1.3%
99th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.8 STL+BLK
43rd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
5.9
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-13.5
33rd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-2.1
43rd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
42.9
43rd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
48.8
43rd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
0.6%
26th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
2.5 RPG
41st event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
4
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
11.8
context3.0 minutes per game.
Sample weight
16.4%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Limited sample
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#110
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
530.2
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
4
GP
0.0
PPG
2.5
RPG
0.0
APG
#110
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#110/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
0.0
PPG
2.5
RPG
0.0
APG
0.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
0%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
0.0
P1
Playmaking
0.0
P1
Rebounding
2.5
P41
True shooting
0%
P1
Two-way impact
-13.5
P33
Stops
1%
P100
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
0%
0 made / 3 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
—
0 made / 0 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 3●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
0
PTS
0.0 / game
0–3
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
0–0
FTM–FTA
creation
0
AST
0.0 / game
1
TOV
0.3 / game
0.00×
AST:TOV
0
FD
rebounding
10
REB
2.5 / game
4
OREB
6
DREB
2.5
REB/G
defense
1
STL
0.3 / game
2
BLK
0.5 / game
2
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
42.9
HESI
48.8
PI
41.2
ORtg
54.7
DRtg
-13.5
NRtg
-2.1
Stable NRtg
1%
Stop%
19%
Floor%
0%
eFG%
1%
PIE
85.4
Team DRtg
+30.7
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
rank_above · #109Sandra DavilaSpainrank_below · #111Jade SherringtonAUS
//current_rank
#110
of 192 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#1
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#108
#109
#111
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
0.0
PPG
2.5
RPG
0.0
APG
0.3
SPG
0.5
BPG
—
3P%
0%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
4 GP · event rank #110
//quick_read
The line at a glance
0.0
PPG
2.5
RPG
0.0
APG
0.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
0%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
0.0
P1
Playmaking
0.0
P1
Rebounding
2.5
P41
True shooting
0%
P1
Two-way impact
-13.5
P33
Stops
1%
P100
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
0%
0 made / 3 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
—
0 made / 0 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 3●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
0
PTS
0.0 / game
0–3
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
0–0
FTM–FTA
creation
0
AST
0.0 / game
1
TOV
0.3 / game
0.00×
AST:TOV
0
FD
rebounding
10
REB
2.5 / game
4
OREB
6
DREB
2.5
REB/G
defense
1
STL
0.3 / game
2
BLK
0.5 / game
2
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
42.9
HESI
48.8
PI
41.2
ORtg
54.7
DRtg
-13.5
NRtg
-2.1
Stable NRtg
1%
Stop%
19%
Floor%
0%
eFG%
1%
PIE
85.4
Team DRtg
+30.7
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.