ORtg
71.6
35th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Keren Bertel
COL · b. 2009
//measurables
178 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring load-led profile
Scoring load and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalScorer10.6 PPG · 86th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
10.6 PPGScoring load · 86th event percentile
3.0 stocksDefensive activity · 81st event percentile
- 37.7
- HESI v2.1
- #122
- of 192
- 75%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #122 of 192 · Established
HESI
37.7
Event performance
38th event percentile
PI
44.7
Prospect index
37th event percentile
ORtg
71.6
Points / 100 poss.
35th event percentile
DRtg
80.0
Lower is better
62nd event percentile
NRtg
-8.4
Two-way margin
39th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 71.6 · 35th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 80.0 · Stop% 63.4% · Team DRtg 80.6
Sample context
7 games · 179 minutes · 75% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring load-led profileevent-relative description
Scoring load and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring load
10.6 PPG86th event percentile
Defensive activity
3.0 stocks81st event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
- 02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
37.7
38th event percentile
Prospect index
44.7
37th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
71.6
35th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
80.0
62nd event percentile
Two-way margin
-8.4
39th event percentile
Stop percentage
63.4%
70th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
10.6 PPG
86th event percentile
Creation
2.0 APG
73rd event percentile
Rebounding
3.0 RPG
55th event percentile
Defensive activity
3.0 stocks
81st event percentile
Scoring efficiency
37.9% TS
39th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P86
Scorer
10.6 PPG · 86th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 38th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 71.6 ORtg and 80.0 DRtg, producing a -8.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring load, defensive activity, and creation. The lowest relative areas are offensive efficiency, scoring efficiency, and two-way margin.
Relative strengths
- 86th event percentile
Scoring load
10.6 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
- 81st event percentile
Defensive activity
3.0 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
- 73rd event percentile
Creation
2.0 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Relative weaknesses
- 35th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
71.6 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
- 39th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
37.9% TS
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
- 39th event percentile
Two-way margin
-8.4 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
10.6 PPG
86th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
37.9%
39th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
28.3%
25th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
22.4%
21st event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
26.5%
context4.9 attempts per game
Free throws
63.3%
57th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
33.1%
34th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.0 APG
73rd event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
80.0
62nd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
80.6
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+0.6
71st event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
63.4%
70th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
3.0 STL+BLK
81st event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
44.7
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-8.4
39th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-6.2
38th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
37.7
38th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
44.7
37th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
2.8%
45th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
3.0 RPG
55th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
178.7
context25.5 minutes per game.
Sample weight
74.9%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#122
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
552.3
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
10.6
PPG
3.0
RPG
2.0
APG
#122
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#122/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
10.6
PPG
3.0
RPG
2.0
APG
3.0
TOV/G
1.3
3PM/G
38%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
10.6
P86
Playmaking
2.0
P73
Rebounding
3.0
P55
True shooting
38%
P39
Two-way impact
-8.4
P39
Stops
63%
P70
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
22%
17 made / 76 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
27%
9 made / 34 attempts
FT
Free throws
63%
31 made / 49 attempts
Shot selection
45% of attempts from three
●2PA 42●3PA 34
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
74
PTS
10.6 / game
17–76
FGM–FGA
9–34
3PM–3PA
31–49
FTM–FTA
creation
14
AST
2.0 / game
21
TOV
3.0 / game
0.67×
AST:TOV
35
FD
rebounding
21
REB
3.0 / game
5
OREB
16
DREB
3.0
REB/G
defense
18
STL
2.6 / game
3
BLK
0.4 / game
15
PF
21
STL+BLK
3.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
37.7
HESI
44.7
PI
71.6
ORtg
80.0
DRtg
-8.4
NRtg
-6.2
Stable NRtg
63%
Stop%
33%
Floor%
28%
eFG%
3%
PIE
80.6
Team DRtg
+0.6
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
rank_above · #121Portia ReisenCanadarank_below · #123Isabel HassanITA
//current_rank
#122
of 192 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#1
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#120
#121
#123
ITA
9.1 PPG 7.6 RPG 2.6 APG
//event_signalActivity7.6 RPG + 2.6 defensive plays/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
10.6
PPG
3.0
RPG
2.0
APG
2.6
SPG
0.4
BPG
27%
3P%
38%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #122
//quick_read
The line at a glance
10.6
PPG
3.0
RPG
2.0
APG
3.0
TOV/G
1.3
3PM/G
38%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
10.6
P86
Playmaking
2.0
P73
Rebounding
3.0
P55
True shooting
38%
P39
Two-way impact
-8.4
P39
Stops
63%
P70
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
22%
17 made / 76 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
27%
9 made / 34 attempts
FT
Free throws
63%
31 made / 49 attempts
Shot selection
45% of attempts from three
●2PA 42●3PA 34
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
74
PTS
10.6 / game
17–76
FGM–FGA
9–34
3PM–3PA
31–49
FTM–FTA
creation
14
AST
2.0 / game
21
TOV
3.0 / game
0.67×
AST:TOV
35
FD
rebounding
21
REB
3.0 / game
5
OREB
16
DREB
3.0
REB/G
defense
18
STL
2.6 / game
3
BLK
0.4 / game
15
PF
21
STL+BLK
3.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
37.7
HESI
44.7
PI
71.6
ORtg
80.0
DRtg
-8.4
NRtg
-6.2
Stable NRtg
63%
Stop%
33%
Floor%
28%
eFG%
3%
PIE
80.6
Team DRtg
+0.6
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.