Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Mengjie Wu

CHN · b. 2009

//measurables

178 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Scoring efficiency-led profile

Scoring efficiency and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

49.8% TSScoring efficiency · 80th event percentile

4.1 RPGRebounding · 70th event percentile

54.5
HESI v2.1: #88
of 192: 68%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

Rank #88 of 192 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

54.5

Event performance

54th event percentile

58.1

Prospect index

54th event percentile

ORtg

89.8

Points / 100 poss.

63rd event percentile

DRtg

86.8

Lower is better

37th event percentile

NRtg

+3.0

Two-way margin

54th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 89.8 · 63rd event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 86.8 · Stop% 57.2% · Team DRtg 85.4

Sample context

7 games · 126 minutes · 68% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description

Scoring efficiency and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring efficiency

49.8% TS80th event percentile

Rebounding

4.1 RPG70th event percentile

Questions for film

01
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

54.5

54th event percentile

Prospect index

58.1

54th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

89.8

63rd event percentile

Defensive efficiency

86.8

37th event percentile

Two-way margin

+3.0

54th event percentile

Stop percentage

57.2%

52nd event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

3.1 PPG

36th event percentile

Creation

1.3 APG

53rd event percentile

Rebounding

4.1 RPG

70th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.4 stocks

66th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

49.8% TS

80th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 54th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 89.8 ORtg and 86.8 DRtg, producing a +3.0 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring efficiency, rebounding, and defensive activity. The lowest relative areas are scoring load and defensive efficiency.

Relative strengths

Scoring efficiency
49.8% TS
80th event percentile
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Rebounding
4.1 RPG
70th event percentile
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Defensive activity
1.4 steals + blocks/G
66th event percentile
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.

Relative weaknesses

Scoring load
3.1 PPG
36th event percentile
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.
Defensive efficiency
86.8 DRtg
37th event percentile
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

89.8

63rd event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

3.1 PPG

36th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

49.8%

80th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

44.7%

71st event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

42.1%

82nd event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

20.0%

context

0.7 attempts per game

Free throws

71.4%

70th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

42.5%

67th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.3 APG

53rd event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

86.8

37th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

85.4

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-1.4

58th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

57.2%

52nd event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.4 STL+BLK

66th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

27.2

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+3.0

54th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+2.1

54th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

54.5

54th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

58.1

54th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

2.7%

53rd event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

4.1 RPG

70th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

125.6

context

17.9 minutes per game.

Sample weight

67.7%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#88

context

Among 192 published players.

Team possessions

530.2

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

3.1

PPG

4.1

RPG

1.3

APG

#88

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#88/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

3.1

PPG

4.1

RPG

1.3

APG

1.6

TOV/G

0.1

3PM/G

50%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

3.1

P36

Playmaking

1.3

P53

Rebounding

4.1

P70

True shooting

50%

P80

Two-way impact

+3.0

P54

Stops

57%

P52

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

42%

8 made / 19 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

20%

1 made / 5 attempts

Free throws

71%

5 made / 7 attempts

Shot selection

26% of attempts from three

●2PA 14●3PA 5

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

3.1 / game

8–19

FGM–FGA

1–5

3PM–3PA

5–7

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

1.3 / game

TOV

1.6 / game

0.82×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

4.1 / game

OREB

DREB

4.1

REB/G

defense

STL

1.0 / game

BLK

0.4 / game

STL+BLK

1.4 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

54.5

HESI

58.1

89.8

ORtg

86.8

DRtg

+3.0

NRtg

+2.1

Stable NRtg

57%

Stop%

42%

Floor%

45%

eFG%

PIE

85.4

Team DRtg

-1.4

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

rank_above · #87Nene GondoJPN

//current_rank

#88

of 192 ranked

rank_below · #89Aisha DiagneITA

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

3.1

PPG

4.1

RPG

1.3

APG

1.0

SPG

0.4

BPG

20%

3P%

50%

TS%

event_stats