Hesi Sports Consulting
back_to_rankings
Winel Bradon Bibang Bi Belinga portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026

Winel Bradon Bibang Bi Belinga

Point Guard · GAB · b. 2009

//measurables

185 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Creation-led production

Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

//event_signalCreator3.6 APG · 93rd event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

3.6 APGCreation · 93rd event percentile

9.6 PPGScoring load · 82nd event percentile

24.1
HESI v2.1
#104
of 138
64%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

2 events

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #104 of 138 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

24.1

Event performance

24th event percentile

PI

32.0

Prospect index

25th event percentile

ORtg

77.0

Points / 100 poss.

54th event percentile

DRtg

96.2

Lower is better

6th event percentile

NRtg

-19.2

Two-way margin

34th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 77.0 · 54th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 96.2 · Stop% 55.2% · Team DRtg 96.4

Sample context

5 games · 109 minutes · 64% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Creation-led productionevent-relative description

Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Creation

3.6 APG93rd event percentile

Scoring load

9.6 PPG82nd event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?

  2. 02

    Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

  3. 03

    Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

24.1

24th event percentile

Prospect index

32.0

25th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

77.0

54th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

96.2

6th event percentile

Two-way margin

-19.2

34th event percentile

Stop percentage

55.2%

37th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

9.6 PPG

82nd event percentile

Creation

3.6 APG

93rd event percentile

Rebounding

4.0 RPG

57th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.8 stocks

53rd event percentile

Scoring efficiency

38.5% TS

57th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P93

    Creator

    3.6 APG · 93rd event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 24th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 77.0 ORtg and 96.2 DRtg, producing a -19.2 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation and scoring load. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, two-way margin, and defensive stops.

Relative strengths

  1. Creation

    3.6 APG

    93rd event percentile

    Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.

  2. Scoring load

    9.6 PPG

    82nd event percentile

    Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Defensive efficiency

    96.2 DRtg

    6th event percentile

    The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.

  2. Two-way margin

    -19.2 NRtg

    34th event percentile

    The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.

  3. Defensive stops

    55.2% Stop%

    37th event percentile

    The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

77.0

54th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

9.6 PPG

82nd event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

38.5%

57th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

37.7%

64th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

35.1%

67th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

16.7%

context

3.6 attempts per game

Free throws

41.7%

30th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

36.9%

60th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

3.6 APG

93rd event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

96.2

6th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

96.4

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+0.2

59th event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

55.2%

37th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.8 STL+BLK

53rd event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

26.5

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-19.2

34th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-14.3

24th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

24.1

24th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

32.0

25th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

4.4%

66th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

4.0 RPG

57th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

5

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

108.9

context

21.8 minutes per game.

Sample weight

64.5%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#104

context

Among 138 published players.

Team possessions

441.0

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

5

GP

9.6

PPG

4.0

RPG

3.6

APG

#104

RANK

//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4

Regional · 2026

#19

RANK

57

FIELD

68%

PERCENTILE

7.3

PPG

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#104/138view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

9.6

PPG

4.0

RPG

3.6

APG

3.2

TOV/G

0.6

3PM/G

39%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

9.6

P82

Playmaking

3.6

P93

Rebounding

4.0

P57

True shooting

39%

P57

Two-way impact

-19.2

P34

Stops

55%

P37

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

35%

20 made / 57 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

17%

3 made / 18 attempts

FT

Free throws

42%

5 made / 12 attempts

Shot selection

32% of attempts from three

●2PA 39●3PA 18

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

48

PTS

9.6 / game

20–57

FGM–FGA

3–18

3PM–3PA

5–12

FTM–FTA

creation

18

AST

3.6 / game

16

TOV

3.2 / game

1.13×

AST:TOV

10

FD

rebounding

20

REB

4.0 / game

10

OREB

10

DREB

4.0

REB/G

defense

9

STL

1.8 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

8

PF

9

STL+BLK

1.8 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

24.1

HESI

32.0

PI

77.0

ORtg

96.2

DRtg

-19.2

NRtg

-14.3

Stable NRtg

55%

Stop%

37%

Floor%

38%

eFG%

4%

PIE

96.4

Team DRtg

+0.2

Def. lift

sample_context

5 games109 minutes21.8 min/game64% sample weightrank #104 of 138

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4

Regional · 2026

#19/57view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

7.3

PPG

3.0

RPG

4.5

APG

3.2

TOV/G

0.3

3PM/G

37%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

7.3

P61

Playmaking

4.5

P99

Rebounding

3.0

P42

True shooting

37%

P44

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

35%

19 made / 54 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

13%

2 made / 16 attempts

FT

Free throws

33%

4 made / 12 attempts

Shot selection

30% of attempts from three

●2PA 38●3PA 16

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

44

PTS

7.3 / game

19–54

FGM–FGA

2–16

3PM–3PA

4–12

FTM–FTA

creation

27

AST

4.5 / game

19

TOV

3.2 / game

1.42×

AST:TOV

—

FD

rebounding

18

REB

3.0 / game

9

OREB

9

DREB

3.0

REB/G

defense

12

STL

2.0 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

8

PF

12

STL+BLK

2.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

37%

eFG%

3%

PIE

sample_context

6 gamesrank #19 of 57
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 138 ranked players.

rank_above · #103Isayah GallasPG · Cameroon

//current_rank

#104

of 138 ranked

rank_below · #105Saad Mouachi AouajMorocco
more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.

  • Nathan Djako portrait#1

    Nathan Djako

    Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire

    17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG

    //event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Mohamed Riad EL Gabal portrait#102

    Mohamed Riad EL Gabal

    Morocco

    0.0 PPG 1.0 RPG 0.0 APG

  • Isayah Gallas portrait#103

    Isayah Gallas

    Point Guard · Cameroon

    0.0 PPG 0.3 RPG 0.0 APG

  • Saad Mouachi Aouaj portrait#105

    Saad Mouachi Aouaj

    Morocco

    6.4 PPG 2.0 RPG 0.6 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

6

GP

7.3

PPG

3.0

RPG

4.5

APG

2.0

SPG

0.0

BPG

—

3P%

37%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

5 GP · event rank #104

//quick_read

The line at a glance

9.6

PPG

4.0

RPG

3.6

APG

3.2

TOV/G

0.6

3PM/G

39%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

9.6

P82

Playmaking

3.6

P93

Rebounding

4.0

P57

True shooting

39%

P57

Two-way impact

-19.2

P34

Stops

55%

P37

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

35%

20 made / 57 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

17%

3 made / 18 attempts

FT

Free throws

42%

5 made / 12 attempts

Shot selection

32% of attempts from three

●2PA 39●3PA 18

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

48

PTS

9.6 / game

20–57

FGM–FGA

3–18

3PM–3PA

5–12

FTM–FTA

creation

18

AST

3.6 / game

16

TOV

3.2 / game

1.13×

AST:TOV

10

FD

rebounding

20

REB

4.0 / game

10

OREB

10

DREB

4.0

REB/G

defense

9

STL

1.8 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

8

PF

9

STL+BLK

1.8 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

24.1

HESI

32.0

PI

77.0

ORtg

96.2

DRtg

-19.2

NRtg

-14.3

Stable NRtg

55%

Stop%

37%

Floor%

38%

eFG%

4%

PIE

96.4

Team DRtg

+0.2

Def. lift

sample_context

5 games109 minutes21.8 min/game64% sample weightrank #104 of 138

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 42026

6 GP · event rank #19

//quick_read

The line at a glance

7.3

PPG

3.0

RPG

4.5

APG

3.2

TOV/G

0.3

3PM/G

37%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

7.3

P61

Playmaking

4.5

P99

Rebounding

3.0

P42

True shooting

37%

P44

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

35%

19 made / 54 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

13%

2 made / 16 attempts

FT

Free throws

33%

4 made / 12 attempts

Shot selection

30% of attempts from three

●2PA 38●3PA 16

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

44

PTS

7.3 / game

19–54

FGM–FGA

2–16

3PM–3PA

4–12

FTM–FTA

creation

27

AST

4.5 / game

19

TOV

3.2 / game

1.42×

AST:TOV

—

FD

rebounding

18

REB

3.0 / game

9

OREB

9

DREB

3.0

REB/G

defense

12

STL

2.0 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

8

PF

12

STL+BLK

2.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

37%

eFG%

3%

PIE

sample_context

6 gamesrank #19 of 57

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

CLAIM_THIS_PROFILE

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.