Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Marisol Gomez

MEX · b. 2010

//measurables

181 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Rebounding-led profile

Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

3.4 RPGRebounding · 61st event percentile

1.1 stocksDefensive activity · 56th event percentile

15.7
HESI v2.1: #162
of 192: 67%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

Rank #162 of 192 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

15.7

Event performance

16th event percentile

28.3

Prospect index

16th event percentile

ORtg

68.9

Points / 100 poss.

32nd event percentile

DRtg

97.5

Lower is better

11th event percentile

NRtg

-28.6

Two-way margin

21st event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 68.9 · 32nd event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 97.5 · Stop% 54.3% · Team DRtg 96.5

Sample context

7 games · 121 minutes · 67% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Rebounding-led profileevent-relative description

Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Rebounding

3.4 RPG61st event percentile

Defensive activity

1.1 stocks56th event percentile

Questions for film

01
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

15.7

16th event percentile

Prospect index

28.3

16th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

68.9

32nd event percentile

Defensive efficiency

97.5

11th event percentile

Two-way margin

-28.6

21st event percentile

Stop percentage

54.3%

41st event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

4.4 PPG

49th event percentile

Creation

0.1 APG

4th event percentile

Rebounding

3.4 RPG

61st event percentile

Defensive activity

1.1 stocks

56th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

38.3% TS

40th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 16th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 68.9 ORtg and 97.5 DRtg, producing a -28.6 Net Rating. The lowest relative areas are creation, defensive efficiency, and two-way margin.

Relative strengths

No available metric currently clears the 65th event percentile.

Relative weaknesses

Creation
0.1 APG
4th event percentile
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
Defensive efficiency
97.5 DRtg
11th event percentile
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
Two-way margin
-28.6 NRtg
21st event percentile
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

68.9

32nd event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

4.4 PPG

49th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

38.3%

40th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

37.8%

49th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

32.4%

43rd event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

50.0%

context

1.1 attempts per game

Free throws

37.5%

19th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

31.4%

30th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.1 APG

4th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

97.5

11th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

96.5

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-0.9

63rd event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

54.3%

41st event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.1 STL+BLK

56th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

26.5

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-28.6

21st event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-19.0

16th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

15.7

16th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

28.3

16th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

0.7%

26th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

3.4 RPG

61st event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

120.7

context

17.2 minutes per game.

Sample weight

66.8%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#162

context

Among 192 published players.

Team possessions

565.6

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

4.4

PPG

3.4

RPG

0.1

APG

#162

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#162/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

4.4

PPG

3.4

RPG

0.1

APG

1.0

TOV/G

0.6

3PM/G

38%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

4.4

P49

Playmaking

0.1

Rebounding

3.4

P61

True shooting

38%

P40

Two-way impact

-28.6

P21

Stops

54%

P41

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

32%

12 made / 37 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

50%

4 made / 8 attempts

Free throws

38%

3 made / 8 attempts

Shot selection

22% of attempts from three

●2PA 29●3PA 8

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

4.4 / game

12–37

FGM–FGA

4–8

3PM–3PA

3–8

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

0.1 / game

TOV

1.0 / game

0.14×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

3.4 / game

OREB

DREB

3.4

REB/G

defense

STL

0.4 / game

BLK

0.7 / game

STL+BLK

1.1 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

15.7

HESI

28.3

68.9

ORtg

97.5

DRtg

-28.6

NRtg

-19.0

Stable NRtg

54%

Stop%

31%

Floor%

38%

eFG%

PIE

96.5

Team DRtg

-0.9

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

rank_above · #161Linda KotrcovaCZE

//current_rank

#162

of 192 ranked

rank_below · #163Eleonora TavellaITA

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

4.4

PPG

3.4

RPG

0.1

APG

0.4

SPG

0.7

BPG

50%

3P%

38%

TS%

event_stats