ORtg
101.1
80th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Sedra Elshafey
EGY · b. 2009
//measurables
187 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring efficiency-led profile
Scoring efficiency and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
45.4% TSScoring efficiency · 64th event percentile
0.8 APGCreation · 36th event percentile
- 61.8
- HESI v2.1
- #76
- of 192
- 40%
- sample weight
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #76 of 192 · Limited sample
HESI
61.8
Event performance
62nd event percentile
PI
63.9
Prospect index
61st event percentile
ORtg
101.1
Points / 100 poss.
80th event percentile
DRtg
89.0
Lower is better
25th event percentile
NRtg
+12.2
Two-way margin
67th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 101.1 · 80th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 89.0 · Stop% 44.6% · Team DRtg 81.3
Sample context
5 games · 40 minutes · 40% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
45.4% TS64th event percentile
Creation
0.8 APG36th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
- 03
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
61.8
62nd event percentile
Prospect index
63.9
61st event percentile
Offensive efficiency
101.1
80th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
89.0
25th event percentile
Two-way margin
+12.2
67th event percentile
Stop percentage
44.6%
11th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
2.6 PPG
28th event percentile
Creation
0.8 APG
36th event percentile
Rebounding
2.2 RPG
34th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.0 stocks
11th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
45.4% TS
64th event percentile
//rated_event_history
Every rated competition
Records are shown side by side, not as one trend line. Each event has a different player pool and competition context.
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 62nd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 101.1 ORtg and 89.0 DRtg, producing a +12.2 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are offensive efficiency and two-way margin. The lowest relative areas are defensive activity, defensive stops, and defensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 80th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
101.1 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
- 67th event percentile
Two-way margin
+12.2 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Relative weaknesses
- 11th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.0 steals + blocks/G
Recorded steals and blocks are a lower relative area; this does not measure positioning, containment, or communication.
- 11th event percentile
Defensive stops
44.6% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
- 25th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
89.0 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
2.6 PPG
28th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
45.4%
64th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
38.5%
51st event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
38.5%
66th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
0.0%
context0.4 attempts per game
Free throws
100.0%
96th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
47.9%
83rd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.8 APG
36th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
89.0
25th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
81.3
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-7.7
8th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
44.6%
11th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.0 STL+BLK
11th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
7.0
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+12.2
67th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+5.0
62nd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
61.8
62nd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
63.9
61st event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
2.3%
45th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
2.2 RPG
34th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
39.8
context8.0 minutes per game.
Sample weight
39.9%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Limited sample
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#76
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
550.9
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
film_room
Tape & footage
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
Clipvs Vs Marroco · 2026-09-07 · scout: Ahmed Tareq
Clip03
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Ahmed Tareq
2026-09-07
Scouting context is for signed-in users.
Create a free account to unlock the scout's note, style comparisons, and evaluation for this athlete.
[ UNLOCK_FREE → ]04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
5
GP
2.6
PPG
2.2
RPG
0.8
APG
#76
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5
Regional · 2026
#7
RANK
48
FIELD
87%
PERCENTILE
5.0
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#76/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
2.6
PPG
2.2
RPG
0.8
APG
0.4
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
45%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
2.6
P28
Playmaking
0.8
P36
Rebounding
2.2
P34
True shooting
45%
P64
Two-way impact
+12.2
P67
Stops
45%
P11
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
39%
5 made / 13 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 2 attempts
FT
Free throws
100%
3 made / 3 attempts
Shot selection
15% of attempts from three
●2PA 11●3PA 2
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
13
PTS
2.6 / game
5–13
FGM–FGA
0–2
3PM–3PA
3–3
FTM–FTA
creation
4
AST
0.8 / game
2
TOV
0.4 / game
2.00×
AST:TOV
4
FD
rebounding
11
REB
2.2 / game
6
OREB
5
DREB
2.2
REB/G
defense
0
STL
0.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
2
PF
0
STL+BLK
0.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
61.8
HESI
63.9
PI
101.1
ORtg
89.0
DRtg
+12.2
NRtg
+5.0
Stable NRtg
45%
Stop%
48%
Floor%
39%
eFG%
2%
PIE
81.3
Team DRtg
-7.7
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#24/142view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
5.7
PPG
4.8
RPG
0.8
APG
1.7
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
51%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
5.7
P67
Playmaking
0.8
P45
Rebounding
4.8
P69
True shooting
51%
P96
Two-way impact
+31.1
P86
Stops
70%
P69
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
48%
12 made / 25 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
25%
1 made / 4 attempts
FT
Free throws
47%
9 made / 19 attempts
Shot selection
16% of attempts from three
●2PA 21●3PA 4
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
34
PTS
5.7 / game
12–25
FGM–FGA
1–4
3PM–3PA
9–19
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
0.8 / game
10
TOV
1.7 / game
0.50×
AST:TOV
13
FD
rebounding
29
REB
4.8 / game
15
OREB
14
DREB
4.8
REB/G
defense
5
STL
0.8 / game
3
BLK
0.5 / game
7
PF
8
STL+BLK
1.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
83.7
HESI
79.7
PI
88.9
ORtg
57.8
DRtg
+31.1
NRtg
+13.9
Stable NRtg
70%
Stop%
45%
Floor%
50%
eFG%
7%
PIE
56.7
Team DRtg
-1.1
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5
Regional · 2026
#7/48view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
5.0
PPG
8.2
RPG
1.0
APG
1.0
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
43%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
5.0
P57
Playmaking
1.0
P48
Rebounding
8.2
P89
True shooting
43%
P68
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
38%
10 made / 26 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
20%
1 made / 5 attempts
FT
Free throws
57%
4 made / 7 attempts
Shot selection
19% of attempts from three
●2PA 21●3PA 5
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
25
PTS
5.0 / game
10–26
FGM–FGA
1–5
3PM–3PA
4–7
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
1.0 / game
5
TOV
1.0 / game
1.00×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
41
REB
8.2 / game
14
OREB
27
DREB
8.2
REB/G
defense
9
STL
1.8 / game
5
BLK
1.0 / game
4
PF
14
STL+BLK
2.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
40%
eFG%
7%
PIE
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
rank_above · #75Gabrielle FajemirokunCanadarank_below · #77Sophie RichardsonAUS
//current_rank
#76
of 192 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#1
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#74
#75
#77
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
5
GP
5.0
PPG
8.2
RPG
1.0
APG
1.8
SPG
1.0
BPG
—
3P%
43%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
5 GP · event rank #76
//quick_read
The line at a glance
2.6
PPG
2.2
RPG
0.8
APG
0.4
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
45%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
2.6
P28
Playmaking
0.8
P36
Rebounding
2.2
P34
True shooting
45%
P64
Two-way impact
+12.2
P67
Stops
45%
P11
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
39%
5 made / 13 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 2 attempts
FT
Free throws
100%
3 made / 3 attempts
Shot selection
15% of attempts from three
●2PA 11●3PA 2
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
13
PTS
2.6 / game
5–13
FGM–FGA
0–2
3PM–3PA
3–3
FTM–FTA
creation
4
AST
0.8 / game
2
TOV
0.4 / game
2.00×
AST:TOV
4
FD
rebounding
11
REB
2.2 / game
6
OREB
5
DREB
2.2
REB/G
defense
0
STL
0.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
2
PF
0
STL+BLK
0.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
61.8
HESI
63.9
PI
101.1
ORtg
89.0
DRtg
+12.2
NRtg
+5.0
Stable NRtg
45%
Stop%
48%
Floor%
39%
eFG%
2%
PIE
81.3
Team DRtg
-7.7
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #24
//quick_read
The line at a glance
5.7
PPG
4.8
RPG
0.8
APG
1.7
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
51%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
5.7
P67
Playmaking
0.8
P45
Rebounding
4.8
P69
True shooting
51%
P96
Two-way impact
+31.1
P86
Stops
70%
P69
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
48%
12 made / 25 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
25%
1 made / 4 attempts
FT
Free throws
47%
9 made / 19 attempts
Shot selection
16% of attempts from three
●2PA 21●3PA 4
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
34
PTS
5.7 / game
12–25
FGM–FGA
1–4
3PM–3PA
9–19
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
0.8 / game
10
TOV
1.7 / game
0.50×
AST:TOV
13
FD
rebounding
29
REB
4.8 / game
15
OREB
14
DREB
4.8
REB/G
defense
5
STL
0.8 / game
3
BLK
0.5 / game
7
PF
8
STL+BLK
1.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
83.7
HESI
79.7
PI
88.9
ORtg
57.8
DRtg
+31.1
NRtg
+13.9
Stable NRtg
70%
Stop%
45%
Floor%
50%
eFG%
7%
PIE
56.7
Team DRtg
-1.1
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 52026
5 GP · event rank #7
//quick_read
The line at a glance
5.0
PPG
8.2
RPG
1.0
APG
1.0
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
43%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
5.0
P57
Playmaking
1.0
P48
Rebounding
8.2
P89
True shooting
43%
P68
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
38%
10 made / 26 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
20%
1 made / 5 attempts
FT
Free throws
57%
4 made / 7 attempts
Shot selection
19% of attempts from three
●2PA 21●3PA 5
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
25
PTS
5.0 / game
10–26
FGM–FGA
1–5
3PM–3PA
4–7
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
1.0 / game
5
TOV
1.0 / game
1.00×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
41
REB
8.2 / game
14
OREB
27
DREB
8.2
REB/G
defense
9
STL
1.8 / game
5
BLK
1.0 / game
4
PF
14
STL+BLK
2.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
40%
eFG%
7%
PIE
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.