Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Patricija Tikmere

LAT · b. 2009

//measurables

180 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Rebounding-led profile

Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

5.6 RPGRebounding · 84th event percentile

7.7 PPGScoring load · 74th event percentile

48.2
HESI v2.1: #101
of 192: 75%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

Rank #101 of 192 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

48.2

Event performance

48th event percentile

53.0

Prospect index

48th event percentile

ORtg

84.4

Points / 100 poss.

53rd event percentile

DRtg

85.0

Lower is better

45th event percentile

NRtg

-0.6

Two-way margin

49th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 84.4 · 53rd event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 85.0 · Stop% 58.5% · Team DRtg 84.9

Sample context

7 games · 180 minutes · 75% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Rebounding-led profileevent-relative description

Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Rebounding

5.6 RPG84th event percentile

Scoring load

7.7 PPG74th event percentile

Questions for film

01
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

48.2

48th event percentile

Prospect index

53.0

48th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

84.4

53rd event percentile

Defensive efficiency

85.0

45th event percentile

Two-way margin

-0.6

49th event percentile

Stop percentage

58.5%

54th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

7.7 PPG

74th event percentile

Creation

1.3 APG

53rd event percentile

Rebounding

5.6 RPG

84th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.7 stocks

73rd event percentile

Scoring efficiency

42.8% TS

53rd event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

P77
Activity
5.6 RPG + 1.7 defensive plays/G · 77th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 48th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 84.4 ORtg and 85.0 DRtg, producing a -0.6 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are rebounding, scoring load, and defensive activity.

Relative strengths

Rebounding
5.6 RPG
84th event percentile
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Scoring load
7.7 PPG
74th event percentile
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Defensive activity
1.7 steals + blocks/G
73rd event percentile
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.

Relative weaknesses

No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

84.4

53rd event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

7.7 PPG

74th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

42.8%

53rd event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

30.6%

30th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

30.6%

39th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

0.0%

context

0.3 attempts per game

Free throws

75.0%

76th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

41.4%

61st event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.3 APG

53rd event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

85.0

45th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

84.9

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-0.1

66th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

58.5%

54th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.7 STL+BLK

73rd event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

42.2

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-0.6

49th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-0.4

48th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

48.2

48th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

53.0

48th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

5.0%

73rd event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

5.6 RPG

84th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

180.4

context

25.8 minutes per game.

Sample weight

75.0%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#101

context

Among 192 published players.

Team possessions

560.5

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

7.7

PPG

5.6

RPG

1.3

APG

#101

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#101/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

7.7

PPG

5.6

RPG

1.3

APG

2.1

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

43%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

7.7

P74

Playmaking

1.3

P53

Rebounding

5.6

P84

True shooting

43%

P53

Two-way impact

-0.6

P49

Stops

58%

P54

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

31%

15 made / 49 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0 made / 2 attempts

Free throws

75%

24 made / 32 attempts

Shot selection

4% of attempts from three

●2PA 47●3PA 2

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

7.7 / game

15–49

FGM–FGA

0–2

3PM–3PA

24–32

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

1.3 / game

TOV

2.1 / game

0.60×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

5.6 / game

OREB

DREB

5.6

REB/G

defense

STL

1.1 / game

BLK

0.6 / game

STL+BLK

1.7 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

48.2

HESI

53.0

84.4

ORtg

85.0

DRtg

-0.6

NRtg

-0.4

Stable NRtg

58%

Stop%

41%

Floor%

31%

eFG%

PIE

84.9

Team DRtg

-0.1

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

rank_above · #100Nahala ToeleiuNZL

//current_rank

#101

of 192 ranked

rank_below · #102Yatong TangCHN

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

7.7

PPG

5.6

RPG

1.3

APG

1.1

SPG

0.6

BPG

3P%

43%

TS%

event_stats