Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Sara Murillo

COL · b. 2011

//measurables

185 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Rebounding-led profile

Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

3.3 RPGRebounding · 60th event percentile

1.2 stocksDefensive activity · 58th event percentile

17.8
HESI v2.1: #154
of 192: 59%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

Rank #154 of 192 · Provisional

HESI v2.1

HESI

17.8

Event performance

18th event percentile

31.1

Prospect index

20th event percentile

ORtg

49.1

Points / 100 poss.

14th event percentile

DRtg

78.6

Lower is better

69th event percentile

NRtg

-29.5

Two-way margin

20th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 49.1 · 14th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 78.6 · Stop% 66.7% · Team DRtg 80.6

Sample context

6 games · 86 minutes · 59% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Rebounding-led profileevent-relative description

Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Rebounding

3.3 RPG60th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.2 stocks58th event percentile

Questions for film

01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
03
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

17.8

18th event percentile

Prospect index

31.1

20th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

49.1

14th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

78.6

69th event percentile

Two-way margin

-29.5

20th event percentile

Stop percentage

66.7%

76th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

1.5 PPG

14th event percentile

Creation

0.2 APG

6th event percentile

Rebounding

3.3 RPG

60th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.2 stocks

58th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

22.8% TS

12th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 18th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 49.1 ORtg and 78.6 DRtg, producing a -29.5 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive stops and defensive efficiency. The lowest relative areas are creation, scoring efficiency, and offensive efficiency.

Relative strengths

Defensive stops
66.7% Stop%
76th event percentile
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Defensive efficiency
78.6 DRtg
69th event percentile
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.

Relative weaknesses

Creation
0.2 APG
6th event percentile
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
Scoring efficiency
22.8% TS
12th event percentile
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
Offensive efficiency
49.1 ORtg
14th event percentile
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

49.1

14th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

1.5 PPG

14th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

22.8%

12th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

25.0%

18th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

22.2%

20th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

25.0%

context

0.7 attempts per game

Free throws

0.0%

3rd event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

22.1%

14th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.2 APG

6th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

78.6

69th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

80.6

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+2.0

78th event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

66.7%

76th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.2 STL+BLK

58th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

22.5

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-29.5

20th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-17.2

18th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

17.8

18th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

31.1

20th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

1.5%

35th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

3.3 RPG

60th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

85.6

context

14.3 minutes per game.

Sample weight

58.8%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Provisional

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#154

context

Among 192 published players.

Team possessions

552.3

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

1.5

PPG

3.3

RPG

0.2

APG

#154

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#154/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

1.5

PPG

3.3

RPG

0.2

APG

0.5

TOV/G

0.2

3PM/G

23%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

1.5

P14

Playmaking

0.2

Rebounding

3.3

P60

True shooting

23%

P12

Two-way impact

-29.5

P20

Stops

67%

P76

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

22%

4 made / 18 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

25%

1 made / 4 attempts

Free throws

0 made / 4 attempts

Shot selection

22% of attempts from three

●2PA 14●3PA 4

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

1.5 / game

4–18

FGM–FGA

1–4

3PM–3PA

0–4

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

0.2 / game

TOV

0.5 / game

0.33×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

3.3 / game

OREB

DREB

3.3

REB/G

defense

STL

1.0 / game

BLK

0.2 / game

STL+BLK

1.2 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

17.8

HESI

31.1

49.1

ORtg

78.6

DRtg

-29.5

NRtg

-17.2

Stable NRtg

67%

Stop%

22%

Floor%

25%

eFG%

PIE

80.6

Team DRtg

+2.0

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

rank_above · #153Aislin TamezMEX

//current_rank

#154

of 192 ranked

rank_below · #155Linda ThimmGER

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

1.5

PPG

3.3

RPG

0.2

APG

1.0

SPG

0.2

BPG

25%

3P%

23%

TS%

event_stats