ORtg
93.3
51st event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Small Forward · JPN · b. 2008
//measurables
196 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring load and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
11.0 PPGScoring load · 83rd event percentile
2.3 stocksDefensive activity · 82nd event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #60 of 188 · Established
HESI
68.5
Event performance
68th event percentile
PI
66.3
Prospect index
68th event percentile
ORtg
93.3
Points / 100 poss.
51st event percentile
DRtg
89.3
Lower is better
82nd event percentile
NRtg
+4.0
Two-way margin
65th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 93.3 · 51st event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 89.3 · Stop% 65.5% · Team DRtg 93.1
Sample context
7 games · 138 minutes · 70% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring load and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring load
Defensive activity
Questions for film
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
68.5
68th event percentile
Prospect index
66.3
68th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
93.3
51st event percentile
Defensive efficiency
89.3
82nd event percentile
Two-way margin
+4.0
65th event percentile
Stop percentage
65.5%
86th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
11.0 PPG
83rd event percentile
Creation
1.6 APG
64th event percentile
Rebounding
4.7 RPG
73rd event percentile
Defensive activity
2.3 stocks
82nd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
43.1% TS
40th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Rim Protection
1.0 BPG · 88th event percentile
Shooter
38% 3PT on 3.4 3PA/G
Activity
4.7 RPG + 2.3 defensive plays/G · 79th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 68th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 93.3 ORtg and 89.3 DRtg, producing a +4.0 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive stops, scoring load, and defensive efficiency.
Defensive stops
65.5% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Scoring load
11.0 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Defensive efficiency
89.3 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
93.3
51st event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
11.0 PPG
83rd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
43.1%
40th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
42.6%
44th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
37.0%
45th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
37.5%
context3.4 attempts per game
Free throws
42.1%
19th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
42.5%
54th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.6 APG
64th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
89.3
82nd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
93.1
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+3.8
85th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
65.5%
86th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.3 STL+BLK
82nd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
34.3
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+4.0
65th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+0.4
68th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
68.5
68th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
66.3
68th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
5.3%
77th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
4.7 RPG
73rd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
138.2
context19.7 minutes per game.
Sample weight
69.7%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#60
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
531.5
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
7
GP
11.0
PPG
4.7
RPG
1.6
APG
#60
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
11.0
PPG
4.7
RPG
1.6
APG
1.6
TOV/G
1.3
3PM/G
43%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
11.0
P83
Playmaking
1.6
P64
Rebounding
4.7
P73
True shooting
43%
P40
Two-way impact
+4.0
P65
Stops
65%
P86
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
37%
30 made / 81 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
38%
9 made / 24 attempts
FT
Free throws
42%
8 made / 19 attempts
Shot selection
30% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
77
PTS
11.0 / game
30–81
FGM–FGA
9–24
3PM–3PA
8–19
FTM–FTA
creation
11
AST
1.6 / game
11
TOV
1.6 / game
1.00×
AST:TOV
14
FD
rebounding
33
REB
4.7 / game
12
OREB
21
DREB
4.7
REB/G
defense
9
STL
1.3 / game
7
BLK
1.0 / game
8
PF
16
STL+BLK
2.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
68.5
HESI
66.3
PI
93.3
ORtg
89.3
DRtg
+4.0
NRtg
+0.4
Stable NRtg
65%
Stop%
42%
Floor%
43%
eFG%
5%
PIE
93.1
Team DRtg
+3.8
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
//current_rank
#60
of 188 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
11.0
PPG
4.7
RPG
1.6
APG
1.3
SPG
1.0
BPG
38%
3P%
43%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #60
//quick_read
11.0
PPG
4.7
RPG
1.6
APG
1.6
TOV/G
1.3
3PM/G
43%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
11.0
P83
Playmaking
1.6
P64
Rebounding
4.7
P73
True shooting
43%
P40
Two-way impact
+4.0
P65
Stops
65%
P86
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
37%
30 made / 81 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
38%
9 made / 24 attempts
FT
Free throws
42%
8 made / 19 attempts
Shot selection
30% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
77
PTS
11.0 / game
30–81
FGM–FGA
9–24
3PM–3PA
8–19
FTM–FTA
creation
11
AST
1.6 / game
11
TOV
1.6 / game
1.00×
AST:TOV
14
FD
rebounding
33
REB
4.7 / game
12
OREB
21
DREB
4.7
REB/G
defense
9
STL
1.3 / game
7
BLK
1.0 / game
8
PF
16
STL+BLK
2.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
68.5
HESI
66.3
PI
93.3
ORtg
89.3
DRtg
+4.0
NRtg
+0.4
Stable NRtg
65%
Stop%
42%
Floor%
43%
eFG%
5%
PIE
93.1
Team DRtg
+3.8
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.