ORtg
30.8
3rd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Meredith Jaime
MEX · b. 2009
//measurables
170 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileDefensive activity-led profile
Defensive activity and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
0.5 stocksDefensive activity · 27th event percentile
0.3 APGCreation · 13th event percentile
- 1.6
- HESI v2.1
- #190
- of 192
- 56%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #190 of 192 · Provisional
HESI
1.6
Event performance
2nd event percentile
PI
15.8
Prospect index
1st event percentile
ORtg
30.8
Points / 100 poss.
3rd event percentile
DRtg
103.5
Lower is better
5th event percentile
NRtg
-72.7
Two-way margin
2nd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 30.8 · 3rd event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 103.5 · Stop% 40.7% · Team DRtg 96.5
Sample context
6 games · 77 minutes · 56% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Defensive activity-led profileevent-relative description
Defensive activity and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Defensive activity
0.5 stocks27th event percentile
Creation
0.3 APG13th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
- 03
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
1.6
2nd event percentile
Prospect index
15.8
1st event percentile
Offensive efficiency
30.8
3rd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
103.5
5th event percentile
Two-way margin
-72.7
2nd event percentile
Stop percentage
40.7%
5th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
0.8 PPG
7th event percentile
Creation
0.3 APG
13th event percentile
Rebounding
1.2 RPG
9th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.5 stocks
27th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
14.8% TS
6th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 2nd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 30.8 ORtg and 103.5 DRtg, producing a -72.7 Net Rating. The lowest relative areas are two-way margin, offensive efficiency, and defensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
No available metric currently clears the 65th event percentile.
Relative weaknesses
- 2nd event percentile
Two-way margin
-72.7 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
- 3rd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
30.8 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
- 5th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
103.5 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
0.8 PPG
7th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
14.8%
6th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
9.4%
5th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
6.3%
5th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
11.1%
context1.5 attempts per game
Free throws
100.0%
96th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
12.0%
2nd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.3 APG
13th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
103.5
5th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
96.5
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-6.9
13th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
40.7%
5th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.5 STL+BLK
27th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
12.6
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-72.7
2nd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-40.7
2nd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
1.6
2nd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
15.8
1st event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
-1.7%
11th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
1.2 RPG
9th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
76.6
context12.8 minutes per game.
Sample weight
56.1%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#190
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
565.6
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
6
GP
0.8
PPG
1.2
RPG
0.3
APG
#190
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#190/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
0.8
PPG
1.2
RPG
0.3
APG
1.2
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
15%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
0.8
P7
Playmaking
0.3
P13
Rebounding
1.2
P9
True shooting
15%
P6
Two-way impact
-72.7
P2
Stops
41%
P5
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
6%
1 made / 16 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
11%
1 made / 9 attempts
FT
Free throws
100%
2 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
56% of attempts from three
●2PA 7●3PA 9
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
5
PTS
0.8 / game
1–16
FGM–FGA
1–9
3PM–3PA
2–2
FTM–FTA
creation
2
AST
0.3 / game
7
TOV
1.2 / game
0.29×
AST:TOV
2
FD
rebounding
7
REB
1.2 / game
3
OREB
4
DREB
1.2
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.5 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
5
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
1.6
HESI
15.8
PI
30.8
ORtg
103.5
DRtg
-72.7
NRtg
-40.7
Stable NRtg
41%
Stop%
12%
Floor%
9%
eFG%
-2%
PIE
96.5
Team DRtg
-6.9
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
rank_above · #189Aichata MamboneCôte d'Ivoirerank_below · #191Salimata KoneCôte d'Ivoire
//current_rank
#190
of 192 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#1
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#188
#189
#191
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
0.8
PPG
1.2
RPG
0.3
APG
0.5
SPG
0.0
BPG
11%
3P%
15%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
6 GP · event rank #190
//quick_read
The line at a glance
0.8
PPG
1.2
RPG
0.3
APG
1.2
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
15%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
0.8
P7
Playmaking
0.3
P13
Rebounding
1.2
P9
True shooting
15%
P6
Two-way impact
-72.7
P2
Stops
41%
P5
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
6%
1 made / 16 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
11%
1 made / 9 attempts
FT
Free throws
100%
2 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
56% of attempts from three
●2PA 7●3PA 9
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
5
PTS
0.8 / game
1–16
FGM–FGA
1–9
3PM–3PA
2–2
FTM–FTA
creation
2
AST
0.3 / game
7
TOV
1.2 / game
0.29×
AST:TOV
2
FD
rebounding
7
REB
1.2 / game
3
OREB
4
DREB
1.2
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.5 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
5
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
1.6
HESI
15.8
PI
30.8
ORtg
103.5
DRtg
-72.7
NRtg
-40.7
Stable NRtg
41%
Stop%
12%
Floor%
9%
eFG%
-2%
PIE
96.5
Team DRtg
-6.9
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.