ORtg
75.1
76th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Small Forward · CIV · b. 2008
//measurables
170 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileDefensive activity and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
3.7 stocksDefensive activity · 83rd event percentile
2.2 APGCreation · 80th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #21 of 142 · Established
HESI
87.2
Event performance
87th event percentile
PI
81.3
Prospect index
86th event percentile
ORtg
75.1
Points / 100 poss.
76th event percentile
DRtg
47.5
Lower is better
87th event percentile
NRtg
+27.6
Two-way margin
82nd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 75.1 · 76th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 47.5 · Stop% 64.2% · Team DRtg 41.7
Sample context
6 games · 153 minutes · 72% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Defensive activity and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Defensive activity
Creation
Questions for film
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
87.2
87th event percentile
Prospect index
81.3
86th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
75.1
76th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
47.5
87th event percentile
Two-way margin
+27.6
82nd event percentile
Stop percentage
64.2%
41st event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
5.0 PPG
62nd event percentile
Creation
2.2 APG
80th event percentile
Rebounding
2.0 RPG
31st event percentile
Defensive activity
3.7 stocks
83rd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
40.6% TS
74th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 87th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 75.1 ORtg and 47.5 DRtg, producing a +27.6 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency, defensive activity, and two-way margin. The lowest relative area is rebounding.
Defensive efficiency
47.5 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Defensive activity
3.7 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
Two-way margin
+27.6 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Rebounding
2.0 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
75.1
76th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
5.0 PPG
62nd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
40.6%
74th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
34.8%
67th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
27.3%
50th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
25.0%
context3.3 attempts per game
Free throws
77.8%
92nd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
32.1%
63rd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.2 APG
80th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
47.5
87th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
41.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-5.9
20th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
64.2%
41st event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
3.7 STL+BLK
83rd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
44.3
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+27.6
82nd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+17.4
87th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
87.2
87th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
81.3
86th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
20.1%
82nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
2.0 RPG
31st event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
152.7
context25.4 minutes per game.
Sample weight
71.8%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#21
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
542.2
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
5.0
PPG
2.0
RPG
2.2
APG
#21
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
5.0
PPG
2.0
RPG
2.2
APG
2.7
TOV/G
0.8
3PM/G
41%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
5.0
P62
Playmaking
2.2
P80
Rebounding
2.0
P31
True shooting
41%
P74
Two-way impact
+27.6
P82
Stops
64%
P41
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
27%
9 made / 33 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
25%
5 made / 20 attempts
FT
Free throws
78%
7 made / 9 attempts
Shot selection
61% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
30
PTS
5.0 / game
9–33
FGM–FGA
5–20
3PM–3PA
7–9
FTM–FTA
creation
13
AST
2.2 / game
16
TOV
2.7 / game
0.81×
AST:TOV
10
FD
rebounding
12
REB
2.0 / game
7
OREB
5
DREB
2.0
REB/G
defense
19
STL
3.2 / game
3
BLK
0.5 / game
6
PF
22
STL+BLK
3.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
87.2
HESI
81.3
PI
75.1
ORtg
47.5
DRtg
+27.6
NRtg
+17.4
Stable NRtg
64%
Stop%
32%
Floor%
35%
eFG%
20%
PIE
41.7
Team DRtg
-5.9
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
//current_rank
#21
of 142 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
5.0
PPG
2.0
RPG
2.2
APG
3.2
SPG
0.5
BPG
25%
3P%
41%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #21
//quick_read
5.0
PPG
2.0
RPG
2.2
APG
2.7
TOV/G
0.8
3PM/G
41%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
5.0
P62
Playmaking
2.2
P80
Rebounding
2.0
P31
True shooting
41%
P74
Two-way impact
+27.6
P82
Stops
64%
P41
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
27%
9 made / 33 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
25%
5 made / 20 attempts
FT
Free throws
78%
7 made / 9 attempts
Shot selection
61% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
30
PTS
5.0 / game
9–33
FGM–FGA
5–20
3PM–3PA
7–9
FTM–FTA
creation
13
AST
2.2 / game
16
TOV
2.7 / game
0.81×
AST:TOV
10
FD
rebounding
12
REB
2.0 / game
7
OREB
5
DREB
2.0
REB/G
defense
19
STL
3.2 / game
3
BLK
0.5 / game
6
PF
22
STL+BLK
3.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
87.2
HESI
81.3
PI
75.1
ORtg
47.5
DRtg
+27.6
NRtg
+17.4
Stable NRtg
64%
Stop%
32%
Floor%
35%
eFG%
20%
PIE
41.7
Team DRtg
-5.9
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.