back_to_rankings
Matilda Trout portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Matilda Trout

AUS · b. 2009

//measurables

190 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Creation-led production

Scoring efficiency and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

//event_signalRebounder7.6 RPG · 95th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalCreator3.1 APG · 93rd event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalOffensive Impact107.5 ORtg · 88th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Impact89.5 HESI performance · 88th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

76.1% TSScoring efficiency · 99th event percentile

7.6 RPGRebounding · 95th event percentile

89.5
HESI v2.1
#23
of 192
74%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

Rank #23 of 192 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

89.5

Event performance

89th event percentile

PI

86.1

Prospect index

88th event percentile

ORtg

107.5

Points / 100 poss.

88th event percentile

DRtg

79.5

Lower is better

65th event percentile

NRtg

+28.0

Two-way margin

86th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 107.5 · 88th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 79.5 · Stop% 60.7% · Team DRtg 77.7

Sample context

7 games · 167 minutes · 74% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Creation-led productionevent-relative description

Scoring efficiency and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring efficiency

76.1% TS99th event percentile

Rebounding

7.6 RPG95th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

  2. 02

    Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

89.5

89th event percentile

Prospect index

86.1

88th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

107.5

88th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

79.5

65th event percentile

Two-way margin

+28.0

86th event percentile

Stop percentage

60.7%

63rd event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

6.3 PPG

63rd event percentile

Creation

3.1 APG

93rd event percentile

Rebounding

7.6 RPG

95th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.7 stocks

42nd event percentile

Scoring efficiency

76.1% TS

99th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P95

    Rebounder

    7.6 RPG · 95th event percentile

  • P93

    Creator

    3.1 APG · 93rd event percentile

  • P88

    Offensive Impact

    107.5 ORtg · 88th event percentile

  • P88

    Event Impact

    89.5 HESI performance · 88th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 89th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 107.5 ORtg and 79.5 DRtg, producing a +28.0 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring efficiency, rebounding, and creation.

Relative strengths

  1. Scoring efficiency

    76.1% TS

    99th event percentile

    True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.

  2. Rebounding

    7.6 RPG

    95th event percentile

    Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.

  3. Creation

    3.1 APG

    93rd event percentile

    Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.

Relative weaknesses

No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

107.5

88th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

6.3 PPG

63rd event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

76.1%

99th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

76.2%

99th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

71.4%

99th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

66.7%

context

0.4 attempts per game

Free throws

66.7%

63rd event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

51.0%

89th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

3.1 APG

93rd event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

79.5

65th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

77.7

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-1.8

55th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

60.7%

63rd event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.7 STL+BLK

42nd event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

37.2

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+28.0

86th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+20.7

89th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

89.5

89th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

86.1

88th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

9.8%

91st event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

7.6 RPG

95th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

7

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

166.6

context

23.8 minutes per game.

Sample weight

73.5%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#23

context

Among 192 published players.

Team possessions

515.1

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

7

GP

6.3

PPG

7.6

RPG

3.1

APG

#23

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#23/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

6.3

PPG

7.6

RPG

3.1

APG

2.7

TOV/G

0.3

3PM/G

76%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

6.3

P63

Playmaking

3.1

P93

Rebounding

7.6

P95

True shooting

76%

P99

Two-way impact

+28.0

P86

Stops

61%

P63

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

71%

15 made / 21 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

67%

2 made / 3 attempts

FT

Free throws

67%

12 made / 18 attempts

Shot selection

14% of attempts from three

2PA 183PA 3

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

44

PTS

6.3 / game

15–21

FGM–FGA

2–3

3PM–3PA

12–18

FTM–FTA

creation

22

AST

3.1 / game

19

TOV

2.7 / game

1.16×

AST:TOV

23

FD

rebounding

53

REB

7.6 / game

21

OREB

32

DREB

7.6

REB/G

defense

4

STL

0.6 / game

1

BLK

0.1 / game

16

PF

5

STL+BLK

0.7 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

89.5

HESI

86.1

PI

107.5

ORtg

79.5

DRtg

+28.0

NRtg

+20.7

Stable NRtg

61%

Stop%

51%

Floor%

76%

eFG%

10%

PIE

77.7

Team DRtg

-1.8

Def. lift

sample_context

7 games167 minutes23.8 min/game74% sample weightrank #23 of 192
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.

  • Micah Ojo portrait#1

    Micah Ojo

    United States

    11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG

    //event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Sarai Teijeira portrait#21

    Sarai Teijeira

    Spain

    5.3 PPG 2.9 RPG 0.3 APG

  • Yunshu Pang portrait#22

    Yunshu Pang

    CHN

    10.0 PPG 9.7 RPG 0.9 APG

    //event_signalRebounder9.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalActivity9.7 RPG + 2.6 defensive plays/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Zeina Amin portrait#24

    Zeina Amin

    Egypt

    8.9 PPG 6.6 RPG 1.6 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

7

GP

6.3

PPG

7.6

RPG

3.1

APG

0.6

SPG

0.1

BPG

67%

3P%

76%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

7 GP · event rank #23

//quick_read

The line at a glance

6.3

PPG

7.6

RPG

3.1

APG

2.7

TOV/G

0.3

3PM/G

76%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

6.3

P63

Playmaking

3.1

P93

Rebounding

7.6

P95

True shooting

76%

P99

Two-way impact

+28.0

P86

Stops

61%

P63

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

71%

15 made / 21 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

67%

2 made / 3 attempts

FT

Free throws

67%

12 made / 18 attempts

Shot selection

14% of attempts from three

2PA 183PA 3

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

44

PTS

6.3 / game

15–21

FGM–FGA

2–3

3PM–3PA

12–18

FTM–FTA

creation

22

AST

3.1 / game

19

TOV

2.7 / game

1.16×

AST:TOV

23

FD

rebounding

53

REB

7.6 / game

21

OREB

32

DREB

7.6

REB/G

defense

4

STL

0.6 / game

1

BLK

0.1 / game

16

PF

5

STL+BLK

0.7 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

89.5

HESI

86.1

PI

107.5

ORtg

79.5

DRtg

+28.0

NRtg

+20.7

Stable NRtg

61%

Stop%

51%

Floor%

76%

eFG%

10%

PIE

77.7

Team DRtg

-1.8

Def. lift

sample_context

7 games167 minutes23.8 min/game74% sample weightrank #23 of 192

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.