Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Ota Pozin

SLO · b. 2009

//measurables

181 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Creation-led profile

Creation and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

2.0 APGCreation · 73rd event percentile

47.3% TSScoring efficiency · 72nd event percentile

29.8
HESI v2.1: #135
of 192: 77%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

Rank #135 of 192 · High confidence

HESI v2.1

HESI

29.8

Event performance

30th event percentile

38.4

Prospect index

30th event percentile

ORtg

82.4

Points / 100 poss.

46th event percentile

DRtg

93.7

Lower is better

15th event percentile

NRtg

-11.3

Two-way margin

36th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 82.4 · 46th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 93.7 · Stop% 46.6% · Team DRtg 88.0

Sample context

7 games · 203 minutes · 77% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Creation-led profileevent-relative description

Creation and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Creation

2.0 APG73rd event percentile

Scoring efficiency

47.3% TS72nd event percentile

Questions for film

01
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

29.8

30th event percentile

Prospect index

38.4

30th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

82.4

46th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

93.7

15th event percentile

Two-way margin

-11.3

36th event percentile

Stop percentage

46.6%

16th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

4.4 PPG

49th event percentile

Creation

2.0 APG

73rd event percentile

Rebounding

3.3 RPG

59th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.3 stocks

61st event percentile

Scoring efficiency

47.3% TS

72nd event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

Shooter
35% 3PT on 2.4 3PA/G

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 30th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 82.4 ORtg and 93.7 DRtg, producing a -11.3 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation and scoring efficiency. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, defensive stops, and two-way margin.

Relative strengths

Creation
2.0 APG
73rd event percentile
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Scoring efficiency
47.3% TS
72nd event percentile
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.

Relative weaknesses

Defensive efficiency
93.7 DRtg
15th event percentile
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
Defensive stops
46.6% Stop%
16th event percentile
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
Two-way margin
-11.3 NRtg
36th event percentile
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

82.4

46th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

4.4 PPG

49th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

47.3%

72nd event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

45.2%

73rd event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

35.5%

56th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

35.3%

context

2.4 attempts per game

Free throws

75.0%

76th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

34.6%

37th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

2.0 APG

73rd event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

93.7

15th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

88.0

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-5.7

22nd event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

46.6%

16th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.3 STL+BLK

61st event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

34.7

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-11.3

36th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-8.7

30th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

29.8

30th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

38.4

30th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

4.9%

67th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

3.3 RPG

59th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

203.3

context

29.0 minutes per game.

Sample weight

77.2%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

High confidence

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#135

context

Among 192 published players.

Team possessions

512.3

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

4.4

PPG

3.3

RPG

2.0

APG

#135

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#135/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

4.4

PPG

3.3

RPG

2.0

APG

2.0

TOV/G

0.9

3PM/G

47%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

4.4

P49

Playmaking

2.0

P73

Rebounding

3.3

P59

True shooting

47%

P72

Two-way impact

-11.3

P36

Stops

47%

P16

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

36%

11 made / 31 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

35%

6 made / 17 attempts

Free throws

75%

3 made / 4 attempts

Shot selection

55% of attempts from three

●2PA 14●3PA 17

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

4.4 / game

11–31

FGM–FGA

6–17

3PM–3PA

3–4

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

2.0 / game

TOV

2.0 / game

1.00×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

3.3 / game

OREB

DREB

3.3

REB/G

defense

STL

1.0 / game

BLK

0.3 / game

STL+BLK

1.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

29.8

HESI

38.4

82.4

ORtg

93.7

DRtg

-11.3

NRtg

-8.7

Stable NRtg

47%

Stop%

35%

Floor%

45%

eFG%

PIE

88.0

Team DRtg

-5.7

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

rank_above · #134Samera JeffersCanada

//current_rank

#135

of 192 ranked

rank_below · #136Dana AbdalaaEgypt

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

4.4

PPG

3.3

RPG

2.0

APG

1.0

SPG

0.3

BPG

35%

3P%

47%

TS%

event_stats