ORtg
75.1
49th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
EGY · b. 2010
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//measurables
188 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileCreation and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
4.0 APGCreation · 95th event percentile
34.8% TSScoring efficiency · 42nd event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
3 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #92 of 138 · Established
HESI
30.7
Event performance
31st event percentile
PI
38.4
Prospect index
34th event percentile
ORtg
75.1
Points / 100 poss.
49th event percentile
DRtg
91.7
Lower is better
13th event percentile
NRtg
-16.7
Two-way margin
38th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 75.1 · 49th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 91.7 · Stop% 45.4% · Team DRtg 85.6
Sample context
5 games · 125 minutes · 68% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
Scoring efficiency
Questions for film
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
30.7
31st event percentile
Prospect index
38.4
34th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
75.1
49th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
91.7
13th event percentile
Two-way margin
-16.7
38th event percentile
Stop percentage
45.4%
13th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
3.4 PPG
36th event percentile
Creation
4.0 APG
95th event percentile
Rebounding
1.8 RPG
25th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.0 stocks
40th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
34.8% TS
42nd event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Creator
4.0 APG · 95th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 31st event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 75.1 ORtg and 91.7 DRtg, producing a -16.7 Net Rating. The clearest relative strength is creation. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, defensive stops, and rebounding.
Creation
4.0 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Defensive efficiency
91.7 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
Defensive stops
45.4% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
Rebounding
1.8 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
75.1
49th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
3.4 PPG
36th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
34.8%
42nd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
22.5%
24th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
20.0%
22nd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
12.5%
context1.6 attempts per game
Free throws
80.0%
90th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
34.1%
50th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
4.0 APG
95th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
91.7
13th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
85.6
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-6.2
18th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
45.4%
13th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.0 STL+BLK
40th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
23.6
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-16.7
38th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-13.0
31st event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
30.7
31st event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
38.4
34th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
3.3%
56th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
1.8 RPG
25th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
125.1
context25.0 minutes per game.
Sample weight
67.6%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#92
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
497.8
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
3.4
PPG
1.8
RPG
4.0
APG
#92
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5
Regional · 2026
#20
RANK
70
FIELD
72%
PERCENTILE
6.3
PPG
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
3.4
PPG
1.8
RPG
4.0
APG
FIBA U16 AfroBasket
Continental · 2025
6
GP
6.5
PPG
1.7
RPG
1.2
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5
Regional · 2026
4
GP
6.3
PPG
1.5
RPG
5.0
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
//current_rank
#92
of 138 ranked
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
6.3
PPG
1.5
RPG
5.0
APG
0.5
SPG
0.3
BPG
—
3P%
49%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
5 GP · event rank #92
//quick_read
3.4
PPG
1.8
RPG
4.0
APG
2.2
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
35%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
3.4
P36
Playmaking
4.0
P95
Rebounding
1.8
P25
True shooting
35%
P42
Two-way impact
-16.7
P38
Stops
45%
P13
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
20%
4 made / 20 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
13%
1 made / 8 attempts
FT
Free throws
80%
8 made / 10 attempts
Shot selection
40% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
17
PTS
3.4 / game
4–20
FGM–FGA
1–8
3PM–3PA
8–10
FTM–FTA
creation
20
AST
4.0 / game
11
TOV
2.2 / game
1.82×
AST:TOV
10
FD
rebounding
9
REB
1.8 / game
0
OREB
9
DREB
1.8
REB/G
defense
5
STL
1.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
4
PF
5
STL+BLK
1.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
30.7
HESI
38.4
PI
75.1
ORtg
91.7
DRtg
-16.7
NRtg
-13.0
Stable NRtg
45%
Stop%
34%
Floor%
23%
eFG%
3%
PIE
85.6
Team DRtg
-6.2
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 52026
4 GP · event rank #20
//quick_read
6.3
PPG
1.5
RPG
5.0
APG
0.8
TOV/G
0.5
3PM/G
49%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
6.3
P51
Playmaking
5.0
P98
Rebounding
1.5
P20
True shooting
49%
P77
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
42%
10 made / 24 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
22%
2 made / 9 attempts
FT
Free throws
100%
3 made / 3 attempts
Shot selection
38% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
25
PTS
6.3 / game
10–24
FGM–FGA
2–9
3PM–3PA
3–3
FTM–FTA
creation
20
AST
5.0 / game
3
TOV
0.8 / game
6.67×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
6
REB
1.5 / game
0
OREB
6
DREB
1.5
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.5 / game
1
BLK
0.3 / game
7
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
46%
eFG%
3%
PIE
FIBA U16 AfroBasket2025
6 GP · event rank #57
//quick_read
6.5
PPG
1.7
RPG
1.2
APG
0.8
TOV/G
1.8
3PM/G
42%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
6.5
P64
Playmaking
1.2
P57
Rebounding
1.7
P17
True shooting
42%
P78
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
30%
14 made / 46 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
33%
11 made / 33 attempts
FT
Free throws
0%
0 made / 0 attempts
Shot selection
72% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
39
PTS
6.5 / game
14–46
FGM–FGA
11–33
3PM–3PA
0–0
FTM–FTA
creation
7
AST
1.2 / game
5
TOV
0.8 / game
1.40×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
10
REB
1.7 / game
5
OREB
5
DREB
1.7
REB/G
defense
5
STL
0.8 / game
3
BLK
0.5 / game
9
PF
8
STL+BLK
1.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
42%
eFG%
1%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.