back_to_rankings
Hussain Youssef portrait
Unclaimed
event_player

Hussain Youssef

EGY · b. 2010

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//measurables

188 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Creation-led production

Creation and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

4.0 APGCreation · 95th event percentile

34.8% TSScoring efficiency · 42nd event percentile

30.7
HESI v2.1
#92
of 138
68%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

3 events

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #92 of 138 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

30.7

Event performance

31st event percentile

PI

38.4

Prospect index

34th event percentile

ORtg

75.1

Points / 100 poss.

49th event percentile

DRtg

91.7

Lower is better

13th event percentile

NRtg

-16.7

Two-way margin

38th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 75.1 · 49th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 91.7 · Stop% 45.4% · Team DRtg 85.6

Sample context

5 games · 125 minutes · 68% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Creation-led productionevent-relative description

Creation and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Creation

4.0 APG95th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

34.8% TS42nd event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?

  2. 02

    Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

30.7

31st event percentile

Prospect index

38.4

34th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

75.1

49th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

91.7

13th event percentile

Two-way margin

-16.7

38th event percentile

Stop percentage

45.4%

13th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

3.4 PPG

36th event percentile

Creation

4.0 APG

95th event percentile

Rebounding

1.8 RPG

25th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.0 stocks

40th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

34.8% TS

42nd event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P95

    Creator

    4.0 APG · 95th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 31st event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 75.1 ORtg and 91.7 DRtg, producing a -16.7 Net Rating. The clearest relative strength is creation. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, defensive stops, and rebounding.

Relative strengths

  1. Creation

    4.0 APG

    95th event percentile

    Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Defensive efficiency

    91.7 DRtg

    13th event percentile

    The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.

  2. Defensive stops

    45.4% Stop%

    13th event percentile

    The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.

  3. Rebounding

    1.8 RPG

    25th event percentile

    Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

75.1

49th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

3.4 PPG

36th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

34.8%

42nd event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

22.5%

24th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

20.0%

22nd event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

12.5%

context

1.6 attempts per game

Free throws

80.0%

90th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

34.1%

50th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

4.0 APG

95th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

91.7

13th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

85.6

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-6.2

18th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

45.4%

13th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.0 STL+BLK

40th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

23.6

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-16.7

38th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-13.0

31st event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

30.7

31st event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

38.4

34th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

3.3%

56th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

1.8 RPG

25th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

5

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

125.1

context

25.0 minutes per game.

Sample weight

67.6%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#92

context

Among 138 published players.

Team possessions

497.8

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

5

GP

3.4

PPG

1.8

RPG

4.0

APG

#92

RANK

//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5

Regional · 2026

#20

RANK

70

FIELD

72%

PERCENTILE

6.3

PPG

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

5

GP

3.4

PPG

1.8

RPG

4.0

APG

Full statistics →

FIBA U16 AfroBasket

Continental · 2025

6

GP

6.5

PPG

1.7

RPG

1.2

APG

Full statistics →

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5

Regional · 2026

4

GP

6.3

PPG

1.5

RPG

5.0

APG

Full statistics →
event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players

  • Nathan Djako portrait#1

    Nathan Djako

    Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire

    17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG

    //event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Mohamed Yassine Ben Gharsallah portrait#90

    Mohamed Yassine Ben Gharsallah

    Forward · Tunisia

    0.0 PPG 1.3 RPG 0.3 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

4

GP

6.3

PPG

1.5

RPG

5.0

APG

0.5

SPG

0.3

BPG

—

3P%

49%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

5 GP · event rank #92

//quick_read

The line at a glance

3.4

PPG

1.8

RPG

4.0

APG

2.2

TOV/G

0.2

3PM/G

35%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

3.4

P36

Playmaking

4.0

P95

Rebounding

1.8

P25

True shooting

35%

P42

Two-way impact

-16.7

P38

Stops

45%

P13

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

20%

4 made / 20 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

13%

1 made / 8 attempts

FT

Free throws

80%

8 made / 10 attempts

Shot selection

40% of attempts from three

●2PA 12●3PA 8

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

17

PTS

3.4 / game

4–20

FGM–FGA

1–8

3PM–3PA

8–10

FTM–FTA

creation

20

AST

4.0 / game

11

TOV

2.2 / game

1.82×

AST:TOV

10

FD

rebounding

9

REB

1.8 / game

0

OREB

9

DREB

1.8

REB/G

defense

5

STL

1.0 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

4

PF

5

STL+BLK

1.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

30.7

HESI

38.4

PI

75.1

ORtg

91.7

DRtg

-16.7

NRtg

-13.0

Stable NRtg

45%

Stop%

34%

Floor%

23%

eFG%

3%

PIE

85.6

Team DRtg

-6.2

Def. lift

sample_context

5 games125 minutes25.0 min/game68% sample weightrank #92 of 138

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 52026

4 GP · event rank #20

//quick_read

The line at a glance

6.3

PPG

1.5

RPG

5.0

APG

0.8

TOV/G

0.5

3PM/G

49%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

6.3

P51

Playmaking

5.0

P98

Rebounding

1.5

P20

True shooting

49%

P77

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

42%

10 made / 24 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

22%

2 made / 9 attempts

FT

Free throws

100%

3 made / 3 attempts

Shot selection

38% of attempts from three

●2PA 15●3PA 9

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

25

PTS

6.3 / game

10–24

FGM–FGA

2–9

3PM–3PA

3–3

FTM–FTA

creation

20

AST

5.0 / game

3

TOV

0.8 / game

6.67×

AST:TOV

—

FD

rebounding

6

REB

1.5 / game

0

OREB

6

DREB

1.5

REB/G

defense

2

STL

0.5 / game

1

BLK

0.3 / game

7

PF

3

STL+BLK

0.8 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

46%

eFG%

3%

PIE

sample_context

4 gamesrank #20 of 70

FIBA U16 AfroBasket2025

6 GP · event rank #57

//quick_read

The line at a glance

6.5

PPG

1.7

RPG

1.2

APG

0.8

TOV/G

1.8

3PM/G

42%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

6.5

P64

Playmaking

1.2

P57

Rebounding

1.7

P17

True shooting

42%

P78

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

30%

14 made / 46 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

33%

11 made / 33 attempts

FT

Free throws

0%

0 made / 0 attempts

Shot selection

72% of attempts from three

●2PA 13●3PA 33

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

39

PTS

6.5 / game

14–46

FGM–FGA

11–33

3PM–3PA

0–0

FTM–FTA

creation

7

AST

1.2 / game

5

TOV

0.8 / game

1.40×

AST:TOV

—

FD

rebounding

10

REB

1.7 / game

5

OREB

5

DREB

1.7

REB/G

defense

5

STL

0.8 / game

3

BLK

0.5 / game

9

PF

8

STL+BLK

1.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

42%

eFG%

1%

PIE

sample_context

6 gamesrank #57 of 131

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.