Hesi Sports Consulting
back_to_rankings
Sienna Morris portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Sienna Morris

CAN · b. 2010

//measurables

199 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Scoring efficiency-led profile

Scoring efficiency and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

46.1% TSScoring efficiency · 68th event percentile

2.8 RPGRebounding · 49th event percentile

58.6
HESI v2.1
#79
of 192
43%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

Rank #79 of 192 · Limited sample

HESI v2.1

HESI

58.6

Event performance

59th event percentile

PI

62.6

Prospect index

59th event percentile

ORtg

89.2

Points / 100 poss.

62nd event percentile

DRtg

81.0

Lower is better

58th event percentile

NRtg

+8.2

Two-way margin

62nd event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 89.2 · 62nd event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 81.0 · Stop% 64.3% · Team DRtg 82.1

Sample context

5 games · 44 minutes · 43% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description

Scoring efficiency and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring efficiency

46.1% TS68th event percentile

Rebounding

2.8 RPG49th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?

  2. 02

    Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?

  3. 03

    Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

58.6

59th event percentile

Prospect index

62.6

59th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

89.2

62nd event percentile

Defensive efficiency

81.0

58th event percentile

Two-way margin

+8.2

62nd event percentile

Stop percentage

64.3%

72nd event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

1.8 PPG

18th event percentile

Creation

0.4 APG

16th event percentile

Rebounding

2.8 RPG

49th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.8 stocks

44th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

46.1% TS

68th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 59th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 89.2 ORtg and 81.0 DRtg, producing a +8.2 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive stops and scoring efficiency. The lowest relative areas are creation and scoring load.

Relative strengths

  1. Defensive stops

    64.3% Stop%

    72nd event percentile

    The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.

  2. Scoring efficiency

    46.1% TS

    68th event percentile

    True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Creation

    0.4 APG

    16th event percentile

    Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.

  2. Scoring load

    1.8 PPG

    18th event percentile

    Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

89.2

62nd event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

1.8 PPG

18th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

46.1%

68th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

37.5%

48th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

37.5%

63rd event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Free throws

75.0%

76th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

43.1%

70th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.4 APG

16th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

81.0

58th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

82.1

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+1.1

76th event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

64.3%

72nd event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.8 STL+BLK

44th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

11.0

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+8.2

62nd event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+3.6

59th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

58.6

59th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

62.6

59th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

1.4%

35th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

2.8 RPG

49th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

5

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

44.4

context

8.9 minutes per game.

Sample weight

42.5%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Limited sample

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#79

context

Among 192 published players.

Team possessions

540.5

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

5

GP

1.8

PPG

2.8

RPG

0.4

APG

#79

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#79/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

1.8

PPG

2.8

RPG

0.4

APG

0.8

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

46%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

1.8

P18

Playmaking

0.4

P16

Rebounding

2.8

P49

True shooting

46%

P68

Two-way impact

+8.2

P62

Stops

64%

P72

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

38%

3 made / 8 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

—

0 made / 0 attempts

FT

Free throws

75%

3 made / 4 attempts

Shot selection

0% of attempts from three

●2PA 8●3PA 0

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

9

PTS

1.8 / game

3–8

FGM–FGA

0–0

3PM–3PA

3–4

FTM–FTA

creation

2

AST

0.4 / game

4

TOV

0.8 / game

0.50×

AST:TOV

3

FD

rebounding

14

REB

2.8 / game

8

OREB

6

DREB

2.8

REB/G

defense

2

STL

0.4 / game

2

BLK

0.4 / game

5

PF

4

STL+BLK

0.8 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

58.6

HESI

62.6

PI

89.2

ORtg

81.0

DRtg

+8.2

NRtg

+3.6

Stable NRtg

64%

Stop%

43%

Floor%

38%

eFG%

1%

PIE

82.1

Team DRtg

+1.1

Def. lift

sample_context

5 games44 minutes8.9 min/game43% sample weightrank #79 of 192
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

rank_above · #78Elba EscorciaCOL

//current_rank

#79

of 192 ranked

rank_below · #80Frederike AskampGER
more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.

  • Micah Ojo portrait#1

    Micah Ojo

    United States

    11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG

    //event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Sophie Richardson portrait#77

    Sophie Richardson

    AUS

    8.0 PPG 2.9 RPG 1.6 APG

  • Elba Escorcia portrait#78

    Elba Escorcia

    COL

    6.9 PPG 3.6 RPG 2.0 APG

  • Frederike Askamp portrait#80

    Frederike Askamp

    GER

    6.9 PPG 6.7 RPG 2.0 APG

    //event_signalDisruptor3.4 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

5

GP

1.8

PPG

2.8

RPG

0.4

APG

0.4

SPG

0.4

BPG

—

3P%

46%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

5 GP · event rank #79

//quick_read

The line at a glance

1.8

PPG

2.8

RPG

0.4

APG

0.8

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

46%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

1.8

P18

Playmaking

0.4

P16

Rebounding

2.8

P49

True shooting

46%

P68

Two-way impact

+8.2

P62

Stops

64%

P72

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

38%

3 made / 8 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

—

0 made / 0 attempts

FT

Free throws

75%

3 made / 4 attempts

Shot selection

0% of attempts from three

●2PA 8●3PA 0

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

9

PTS

1.8 / game

3–8

FGM–FGA

0–0

3PM–3PA

3–4

FTM–FTA

creation

2

AST

0.4 / game

4

TOV

0.8 / game

0.50×

AST:TOV

3

FD

rebounding

14

REB

2.8 / game

8

OREB

6

DREB

2.8

REB/G

defense

2

STL

0.4 / game

2

BLK

0.4 / game

5

PF

4

STL+BLK

0.8 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

58.6

HESI

62.6

PI

89.2

ORtg

81.0

DRtg

+8.2

NRtg

+3.6

Stable NRtg

64%

Stop%

43%

Floor%

38%

eFG%

1%

PIE

82.1

Team DRtg

+1.1

Def. lift

sample_context

5 games44 minutes8.9 min/game43% sample weightrank #79 of 192

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

CLAIM_THIS_PROFILE

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.